How do we decide when life should end? In this thought-provoking episode, we explore the profound ethical questions surrounding end-of-life decisions, examining what it means to live a life worth saving, and the moral implications of assisted death. Through insightful anecdotes and philosophical discourse, we delve into the dilemmas faced by caregivers and patients alike, all underpinned by the guiding principles of faith and ethics.
SPEAKER 02 :
The CEM Network is pleased to present Ronald L. Dart and Born to Win.
SPEAKER 03 :
Are there some lives that are just not worthy to be lived? Are there some lives that are not worth saving for medical reasons? How about for financial reasons? I had a good friend years ago. He was in his early 70s, and he was diagnosed with cancer of the esophagus. His doctor recommended some treatment, but he said, no, I don't want to do that. He was an old rancher, and he concluded that if he'd had an old bull, he wasn't going to spend a whole lot of money on him to try to cure him of a disease that was going to take his life anyway. And so he thought to himself, I'm not worth the investment to attempt to cure. Now, I wasn't so sure I bought his rationale, but I'm not sure that was really his meaning. I think he just didn't want to have to face the pain of sickness and the indignity of treatment. He would rather choose a different life for his last days than the one his doctor held out to him. Now I find it impossible to criticize his decision. He asked me specifically to pray with him and for him, and he committed the last days of his life into God's hands. He was my friend, and I miss him. But I had no right to influence that decision. It was his to make. Now let me present a rather different end-of-life question for you to think about. A man is a diabetic. He has been told he also has terminal cancer. He has been told he faces a lingering, painful death. What if the man makes a decision that while he can still make his own decisions, he doesn't want to die like that? So he simply refuses to take his insulin, slips into a diabetic coma, and dies. How should we feel about that kind of decision? We would think one way about him taking a gun, going into the closet, wrapping his head in a towel, and blowing his brains out. We would think one way about that. How would we think about this one, though? And how should we feel? Is it truly suicide, or is it merely a medical choice? Now, let me make the question harder. Suppose the diabetic in question can no longer make those decisions for himself. He is suffering from dementia and can't be trusted to take his insulin. He faces steady deterioration for years. And finally, an ugly death at the end. Would you or I have the right to make the decision for him? Could we decide to simply stop his insulin and let him slip into a coma and die? Would that be like turning off a respirator to simply fail to give him his insulin and allow him to slip away? What would you decide in these cases? And more important than that, what would be the basis for your decision? All of us have what some people would call a worldview. We are unaware of this, just like a fish is not aware of water, but we all have a grid through which we view life's problems and which we use to make decisions about those problems. But for the most part, that worldview goes unexamined. We never ask ourselves, why do we feel the way we do about this? Why do we think this way? Why is this our conclusion? We have always thought the way we have, and unless something jars us off our platform, we always will. What are the foundational principles upon which we will base our end-of-life decisions, be it our own end of life or someone we love? As Christian people, we like to think that the Bible is our foundation, our platform from which we view the world, that the Bible is the framework for making the hard decisions of life. But when we say that, we immediately are presented with a problem. The Bible simply does not address many of our issues for the simple reason that no one had our tools at his disposal to save life. Except Jesus, of course, and it wasn't our tools he had. He simply could heal the sick and raise the dead. Nothing of medical science as we know it was available. None of the surgical procedures, much of the chemicals, the drugs, none of these things were available. So the Bible never had occasion to talk about it. But that doesn't mean the Bible is of no value to us in making these decisions. We actually, in a lifetime of reading the Bible, use it as the grid, the worldview, the platform from which we view the world and make decisions about that world. Gilbert Mylander, writing in First Things in May of 2005, said this, "...a principle we want to uphold, but have to explore in relation to cases." is that we should never aim at or intend the death of any of our fellow human beings, recognizing possible exceptions in cases where they themselves are threatening the lives of others. Then Mylander offers a corollary to the principle. We should not think of ourselves as the possessors of another's life or judge that another's life is not worthy of our care. Now, this ethic, I think, would hold wide acceptance among Christians and non-Christians alike. Let me repeat them. We should never aim at or intend the death of any of our fellow human beings, with recognized exceptions, and we should not think of ourselves as the possessors of another's life or judge that another's life is not worthy of our care. Now, we would agree on these things, I think, for the most part. But then we have to ask, why do we think that way? How did we come to these guiding principles? And how are they applied to the naughty problems we face as we, or people we love, approach the end of life? I know they tell us we should think these things through and make a living will while we can do so objectively with a clear mind. Personally, I'm really not so sure I would like to trust my end-of-life decisions to a piece of paper. Medical science is moving so fast, and the courts are intervening so often, that what I write in a living will today could become highly problematic tomorrow. My wife and I have talked this over, and our decision is that we both trust each other, and we're going to leave it in our own hands. Now, we all know there will be a time to go. The question is, who gets to make the decision on how it's going to be, and what will be the guiding principle when the time comes to make it? Committed to such a principle, Mylander concluded, we are naturally led to a certain way of caring for others who are ill, suffering, or dying. We should not aim at their death. whether by acting or by omission. And I think I agree with that. On the other hand, because we do not think that continued life is the only good or necessarily the greatest good in every circumstance, we are not obligated to do everything that might be done to keep someone alive. And I think we would agree with that. Actually, there are ridiculous extremes to which no one really thinks we should go just to keep... a person alive. If a possible medical treatment seems useless or quite burdensome for the patient, we are under no obligation to try it or continue it. In withholding or withdrawing the treatment, we are aiming at another good, the good of life free of the burden of treatment even if the life is shorter. And that is precisely the choice my rancher friend made. He chose a life free of the burden of treatment, even though he knew it would be shorter than his life under the treatment. He just didn't want to undergo the indignity. We can easily imagine a patient deciding to forego a round of painful medical treatment and choosing a shorter life, but one free of the burden of that treatment. We've come to the place, though, where we can no longer be certain when a patient has gone beyond the reach of our care. We're just not sure. And at this point, Mylander puts the issue a different way. Most of us feel that it is right to let people die who are clearly dying. But what about letting patients die who are, in fact, not dying? The example of this that comes immediately to mind is Terry Shavell. As I listened to all the arguments rage back and forth, and it was a useful time, frankly, for people who were paying attention to these things to hear all the debates on all sides of the issues, I had a simple question that kept coming to mind and that absolutely no one answered for me. What is the moral difference between withdrawing her feeding tube on the one hand and giving her a shot of, say, morphine, which would end her life more quickly and certainly painlessly? What's the difference? No one answered the question. And some of the people I put it to pretended not to hear it. If we accept the principle that we should not intend or attempt to bring about the death of another person... then we must ask about euthanasia. Because in such a case, we are choosing what we perceive to be a better death, or at least an earlier death. But either way, we are choosing death. We are intending and attempting to bring about the death of another human being. Well, now with the coroner's report in, we know, sort of, that Terri Chaveau could not have recovered, ever. And we know, I suppose, that she suffered no conscious pain as she was starved to death. But we do know this, too. We know that a conscious decision was made to end her life. Period. Now we will have to debate all the other circumstances where we will have that same decision come to us again. because this was not merely a matter of withholding life support. It was a matter of ending her life. I couldn't call it euthanasia, because euthanasia is defined as the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals. An overdose of morphine would have been euthanasia. In Terry's case, it was merely bringing about her death with intention, without the palliative effect. of euthanasia. It seems to me that if we reject euthanasia, then we must also reject starving a person to death even when there is no chance of recovery. How are we going to make these decisions in years to come as medical science keeps giving us more options about how to live our last days and more ways to die?
SPEAKER 02 :
We'll talk further about this, but first, listen to this important message. Is life worth living? There may be times when you feel like giving it up, but there is never a sacrifice or act of suffering that is worthless or in vain. Write for a free copy of the program titled, Is Life Worth Living? Write to Born to Win, Post Office Box 560, White House, Texas 75791, or call toll-free at
SPEAKER 03 :
1-888-BIBLE-44 So, is it wrong to hope or wish that a suffering person would go ahead and die? You know, I know people do that. I know they feel guilty because of it, but they don't need to. It's not wrong to hope or wish that the suffering would go away. The wrong would come in trying to bring it about. Lingering in the background of this question is an issue Paul Ramsey addressed in his book, The Patient as a Person. He concluded that there's a substantive difference between stopping feeding someone who might live on indefinitely and turning off a respirator for someone who cannot breathe on his own. He said, and I quote, One does not know for certain that a patient will be unable to breathe on his own, And, unless we intend to suffocate him if he does breathe successfully on his own, it is possible to remove the respirator while withholding an intention to bring about the person's death. End of quotation. Now, you may have to think about that a little bit, and you may not even agree with it, but there's a certain sense in it. If we are going to disconnect the respirator, we can't be, until we turn it off, absolutely certain that the person can't breathe on his own. And so we can turn off the respirator without intending to kill him. Our job would simply be to allow a person who was dying to die. His underlying principle is that we should try to withhold the intention to cause the death of a patient. Now, clearly, in the case of the death of Terri Schiavo, her death was intended. It was intended to cause her death. Ramsey also said, and I quote, Moreover, we could withhold the more invasive interventions while simultaneously withholding an intention that the patient die. But it's hard to believe we could withhold feeding while simultaneously withholding the intention that the patient die. And I have to agree. When you start withholding liquids and feeding, it is your intent that the patient die. Ballander turns to a second sort of case in which intervening to benefit and preserve life means keeping a person alive for what may well be a long period of deterioration and a yet worse death. Suppose he said, for example, a patient suffering from dementia said, experiences an episode where the cardiac arrhythmia causes unconsciousness. Why would we not implant a pacemaker in order to prevent further episodes? Almost certainly, we would provide a pacemaker, he said, if the person were not demented. So why exactly would the presence of dementia make us do otherwise? Now, that's a difficult question. It's a complicated question. And he goes on to analyze it. He says one might reject that conclusion, however, or at least argue with it. The argument would go something like this. In withholding the pacemaker, we are not aiming at this person's death. On the contrary, when all of us choose constantly from among the various lives available to us, we are choosing not only a life, but also certain possible deaths. We are choosing among the various deaths open to us, making some far more likely than others. Now I think what he has in mind here is people who engage in risky hobbies like skydiving and others, where they actually do take chances. People do mountain climbings on the very high peaks where a certain number of them die. He goes on to say, this does not amount to aiming at or intending death when we do that. So we might decline the pacemaker for a demented loved one, choosing thereby a death likely from cardiac arrest rather than a death from other causes at the end of a long period of dementia. And it's hard to listen to think of that and not consider, well, that's not a bad idea, it seems to me. Mylander considers it a serious response, but says he doesn't find it persuasive. Its flaw, he said, is that it's grounded less in a desire to benefit the life that the patient has than to ask whether continued life would be a benefit. Hence, for as long as he lives on, our decision deprives him of benefits well within our power without burdening him greatly. That's what we would do if we gave him a pacemaker. Thus, our desire to orchestrate the circumstances of death, to see that he dies from cardiac problems rather than as the end result of a decade of dementia, deflects our focus from helping him to live better for as long as he does live. Now, one of the things I thought was fascinating, and it illustrates, again, the idea of worldview, the platform from which a person views the world. Mylander says that death means, after all, the defeat of our desire to shape the circumstances of our life. Trying to orchestrate the circumstances of death has the look, therefore, of one last attempt to be what we are not. the author of the story of our life or the life of another. You know, this brought to mind a passage in the Bible that probably helps some of us inform our decisions. It's in Deuteronomy 32, verse 39. God speaking says, See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no God with me. I kill, and I make alive. I wound, and I heal, and neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand. God is the author of life and death, and I'm afraid some of us from time to time forget that and decide that we're going to play God. Euthanasia, said Mylander, is the ultimate attempt at managing death. And it misses the irony that we're attempting to master the very event that announces our lack of mastery. We are exploring now whether some treatment decisions approach too closely to that same managerial attitude, whether they begin to choose death rather than life. And that's a strange thing about our society today. We have gone away from being a culture of life. We are becoming a culture of death, a culture in which people choose to die. We see the results of that in some parts of Islam to this day, a people for whom death becomes the ultimate benefit. They live in a culture of death. And until now, we have lived in a culture of life. Also in Deuteronomy chapter 30, verse 19, God speaks again and says, I call heaven and earth to record this day against you. I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing. Therefore, choose life that both you and your seed may live. Here we are. We are asked to choose life. We have the choice. But again, too many times we are choosing death. There are a couple of more important items.
SPEAKER 02 :
I'll talk about them right after this important announcement. For a free copy of this radio program that you can share with friends and others, write or call this week only and request the program titled The End of the Road. Write to Born to Win, Post Office Box 560, White House, Texas 75791. Or call toll free 1-888-BIBLE44. And tell us the call letters of this radio station.
SPEAKER 03 :
Now I know I have left you with a lot of unanswered questions. Actually, it wasn't my intent to give you the answers. You'll have plenty of friends around you ready to do that. What I'm trying to do is to help us to think through the issues and to look for our basis for making decisions. Where is our home base? Where is our platform? What are the fundamental principles of life that we will use to make those decisions? And since I'm looking at this from a Christian point of view, from a biblical point of view, what can we carry away from the Bible that will help us and will inform us when those times come? Now we all know that Jesus faced a bitter end-of-life decision. In his case, it was not a medical condition, but something altogether different, and something he could have avoided if he wanted to. In the night of the Last Supper, he went to the Garden of Gethsemane and prayed so fervently that he nearly sweat blood. Luke tells a story. It says he came out and went as he was wont to the Mount of Olives. His disciples followed him. And when he was at the place, he said to them, pray that you enter not into temptation. And he was withdrawn from them about a stone's cast. And he kneeled down and he prayed. We know from the gospel accounts that he went away and prayed three times. saying, Father, if you be willing, remove this cup from me. Nevertheless, not my will, but yours be done. And there appeared an angel to him from heaven strengthening him, because this was a hard time for him. And being in agony, he prayed more earnestly, and his sweat was as it were great drops of blood falling down to the ground. He had a terribly hard decision on that night. So hard, in fact, that an angel was sent to strengthen him. And I find myself wondering if the 55th Psalm... formed part of his prayer on that night. You're probably familiar with one verse out of it. It goes like this, Oh, that I had wings like a dove, for then I would fly away and be at rest. Lo, then I would wander far off and remain in the wilderness. I would hasten my escape from the windy storm and tempest. Oh yeah, I can easily understand a desire to get away, a desire to avoid it, to fly away like a dove and not be there. The prayer begins, Give ear to my prayer, O God, don't hide yourself from my supplication. Attend unto me, hear me. I mourn in my complaint and I groan because of the voice of the enemy, because of the oppression of the wicked, for they cast iniquity upon me and in wrath they hate me. This was a painful thing for Jesus, human as he was. that all the accusations of iniquity that were made against him, all of the anger that they expressed toward him, and the outright hatred for a man who in his lifetime had done nothing but good. They cast iniquity upon me, harkens back to Isaiah, who spoke of the time when the Messiah would have our sins laid upon him. My heart is sore pain within me. The terrors of death are fallen upon me. Fearfulness and trembling are come upon me, and horror has overwhelmed me. The facing of death, the end of his life, with the full knowledge of what was coming. It's kind of shocking when you think about the possibility that Jesus actually feared death. But you see, if he had not, he would not have experienced what you and I experience. And I said, oh, that I had wings like a dove. I would fly away and be at rest. I would wander far off and stay in the wilderness, and I would hasten my escape from the windy storm and tempest. For it was not an enemy that reproached me, for then I could have borne it. Neither was it he that hated me that did magnify himself against me. I could have hid from him. But it was you, a man my equal, my guide, my acquaintance. We took sweet counsel together and walked into the house of God in company. You know, nothing could hurt worse than the betrayal of a friend It's hard not to see Judas in this short passage. That night in the Garden of Gethsemane, he said, Judas, do you betray the Son of Man with a kiss?
SPEAKER 02 :
The Born to Win radio program with Ronald L. Dart is sponsored by Christian Educational Ministries and made possible by donations from listeners like you. If you can help, please send your donation to Born to Win, Post Office Box 560, White House, Texas 75791. You may call us at 1-888-BIBLE44 and visit us online at borntowin.net.
SPEAKER 03 :
Gilbert Bylander said, We should not want to think of ourselves as the author of the story of our own life or that of another. Nor, therefore... as one who exercises ultimate authority over life. That's a thought to take away. From time to time, we have some hard decisions as to which of our radio stations we keep and which ones of them we let go, and the number of calls, letters, and comments that come in from a given station help us make those decisions. So let us hear from you. Give us a call or drop us a line. Our phone number again is 1-888-BIBLE44. That's 1-888-242-5344. Our mailing address is Post Office Box 560, White House, Texas 75791. I'm Ronald Dart. Thank you for listening, and remember, you were born to win.
SPEAKER 01 :
Christian Educational Ministries is happy to announce a new full-color Born to Win monthly newsletter with articles and free offers from Ronald L. Dart. Call us today at 1-888-BIBLE44 to sign up or visit us at borntowin.net.
Born to Win's Daily Radio Broadcast and Weekly Sermon. A production of Christian Educational Ministries.
How do we decide when life should end? In this thought-provoking episode, we explore the profound ethical questions surrounding end-of-life decisions, examining what it means to live a life worth saving, and the moral implications of assisted death. Through insightful anecdotes and philosophical discourse, we delve into the dilemmas faced by caregivers and patients alike, all underpinned by the guiding principles of faith and ethics.
SPEAKER 02 :
The CEM Network is pleased to present Ronald L. Dart and Born to Win.
SPEAKER 03 :
Are there some lives that are just not worthy to be lived? Are there some lives that are not worth saving for medical reasons? How about for financial reasons? I had a good friend years ago. He was in his early 70s, and he was diagnosed with cancer of the esophagus. His doctor recommended some treatment, but he said, no, I don't want to do that. He was an old rancher, and he concluded that if he'd had an old bull, he wasn't going to spend a whole lot of money on him to try to cure him of a disease that was going to take his life anyway. And so he thought to himself, I'm not worth the investment to attempt to cure. Now, I wasn't so sure I bought his rationale, but I'm not sure that was really his meaning. I think he just didn't want to have to face the pain of sickness and the indignity of treatment. He would rather choose a different life for his last days than the one his doctor held out to him. Now I find it impossible to criticize his decision. He asked me specifically to pray with him and for him, and he committed the last days of his life into God's hands. He was my friend, and I miss him. But I had no right to influence that decision. It was his to make. Now let me present a rather different end-of-life question for you to think about. A man is a diabetic. He has been told he also has terminal cancer. He has been told he faces a lingering, painful death. What if the man makes a decision that while he can still make his own decisions, he doesn't want to die like that? So he simply refuses to take his insulin, slips into a diabetic coma, and dies. How should we feel about that kind of decision? We would think one way about him taking a gun, going into the closet, wrapping his head in a towel, and blowing his brains out. We would think one way about that. How would we think about this one, though? And how should we feel? Is it truly suicide, or is it merely a medical choice? Now, let me make the question harder. Suppose the diabetic in question can no longer make those decisions for himself. He is suffering from dementia and can't be trusted to take his insulin. He faces steady deterioration for years. And finally, an ugly death at the end. Would you or I have the right to make the decision for him? Could we decide to simply stop his insulin and let him slip into a coma and die? Would that be like turning off a respirator to simply fail to give him his insulin and allow him to slip away? What would you decide in these cases? And more important than that, what would be the basis for your decision? All of us have what some people would call a worldview. We are unaware of this, just like a fish is not aware of water, but we all have a grid through which we view life's problems and which we use to make decisions about those problems. But for the most part, that worldview goes unexamined. We never ask ourselves, why do we feel the way we do about this? Why do we think this way? Why is this our conclusion? We have always thought the way we have, and unless something jars us off our platform, we always will. What are the foundational principles upon which we will base our end-of-life decisions, be it our own end of life or someone we love? As Christian people, we like to think that the Bible is our foundation, our platform from which we view the world, that the Bible is the framework for making the hard decisions of life. But when we say that, we immediately are presented with a problem. The Bible simply does not address many of our issues for the simple reason that no one had our tools at his disposal to save life. Except Jesus, of course, and it wasn't our tools he had. He simply could heal the sick and raise the dead. Nothing of medical science as we know it was available. None of the surgical procedures, much of the chemicals, the drugs, none of these things were available. So the Bible never had occasion to talk about it. But that doesn't mean the Bible is of no value to us in making these decisions. We actually, in a lifetime of reading the Bible, use it as the grid, the worldview, the platform from which we view the world and make decisions about that world. Gilbert Mylander, writing in First Things in May of 2005, said this, "...a principle we want to uphold, but have to explore in relation to cases." is that we should never aim at or intend the death of any of our fellow human beings, recognizing possible exceptions in cases where they themselves are threatening the lives of others. Then Mylander offers a corollary to the principle. We should not think of ourselves as the possessors of another's life or judge that another's life is not worthy of our care. Now, this ethic, I think, would hold wide acceptance among Christians and non-Christians alike. Let me repeat them. We should never aim at or intend the death of any of our fellow human beings, with recognized exceptions, and we should not think of ourselves as the possessors of another's life or judge that another's life is not worthy of our care. Now, we would agree on these things, I think, for the most part. But then we have to ask, why do we think that way? How did we come to these guiding principles? And how are they applied to the naughty problems we face as we, or people we love, approach the end of life? I know they tell us we should think these things through and make a living will while we can do so objectively with a clear mind. Personally, I'm really not so sure I would like to trust my end-of-life decisions to a piece of paper. Medical science is moving so fast, and the courts are intervening so often, that what I write in a living will today could become highly problematic tomorrow. My wife and I have talked this over, and our decision is that we both trust each other, and we're going to leave it in our own hands. Now, we all know there will be a time to go. The question is, who gets to make the decision on how it's going to be, and what will be the guiding principle when the time comes to make it? Committed to such a principle, Mylander concluded, we are naturally led to a certain way of caring for others who are ill, suffering, or dying. We should not aim at their death. whether by acting or by omission. And I think I agree with that. On the other hand, because we do not think that continued life is the only good or necessarily the greatest good in every circumstance, we are not obligated to do everything that might be done to keep someone alive. And I think we would agree with that. Actually, there are ridiculous extremes to which no one really thinks we should go just to keep... a person alive. If a possible medical treatment seems useless or quite burdensome for the patient, we are under no obligation to try it or continue it. In withholding or withdrawing the treatment, we are aiming at another good, the good of life free of the burden of treatment even if the life is shorter. And that is precisely the choice my rancher friend made. He chose a life free of the burden of treatment, even though he knew it would be shorter than his life under the treatment. He just didn't want to undergo the indignity. We can easily imagine a patient deciding to forego a round of painful medical treatment and choosing a shorter life, but one free of the burden of that treatment. We've come to the place, though, where we can no longer be certain when a patient has gone beyond the reach of our care. We're just not sure. And at this point, Mylander puts the issue a different way. Most of us feel that it is right to let people die who are clearly dying. But what about letting patients die who are, in fact, not dying? The example of this that comes immediately to mind is Terry Shavell. As I listened to all the arguments rage back and forth, and it was a useful time, frankly, for people who were paying attention to these things to hear all the debates on all sides of the issues, I had a simple question that kept coming to mind and that absolutely no one answered for me. What is the moral difference between withdrawing her feeding tube on the one hand and giving her a shot of, say, morphine, which would end her life more quickly and certainly painlessly? What's the difference? No one answered the question. And some of the people I put it to pretended not to hear it. If we accept the principle that we should not intend or attempt to bring about the death of another person... then we must ask about euthanasia. Because in such a case, we are choosing what we perceive to be a better death, or at least an earlier death. But either way, we are choosing death. We are intending and attempting to bring about the death of another human being. Well, now with the coroner's report in, we know, sort of, that Terri Chaveau could not have recovered, ever. And we know, I suppose, that she suffered no conscious pain as she was starved to death. But we do know this, too. We know that a conscious decision was made to end her life. Period. Now we will have to debate all the other circumstances where we will have that same decision come to us again. because this was not merely a matter of withholding life support. It was a matter of ending her life. I couldn't call it euthanasia, because euthanasia is defined as the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals. An overdose of morphine would have been euthanasia. In Terry's case, it was merely bringing about her death with intention, without the palliative effect. of euthanasia. It seems to me that if we reject euthanasia, then we must also reject starving a person to death even when there is no chance of recovery. How are we going to make these decisions in years to come as medical science keeps giving us more options about how to live our last days and more ways to die?
SPEAKER 02 :
We'll talk further about this, but first, listen to this important message. Is life worth living? There may be times when you feel like giving it up, but there is never a sacrifice or act of suffering that is worthless or in vain. Write for a free copy of the program titled, Is Life Worth Living? Write to Born to Win, Post Office Box 560, White House, Texas 75791, or call toll-free at
SPEAKER 03 :
1-888-BIBLE-44 So, is it wrong to hope or wish that a suffering person would go ahead and die? You know, I know people do that. I know they feel guilty because of it, but they don't need to. It's not wrong to hope or wish that the suffering would go away. The wrong would come in trying to bring it about. Lingering in the background of this question is an issue Paul Ramsey addressed in his book, The Patient as a Person. He concluded that there's a substantive difference between stopping feeding someone who might live on indefinitely and turning off a respirator for someone who cannot breathe on his own. He said, and I quote, One does not know for certain that a patient will be unable to breathe on his own, And, unless we intend to suffocate him if he does breathe successfully on his own, it is possible to remove the respirator while withholding an intention to bring about the person's death. End of quotation. Now, you may have to think about that a little bit, and you may not even agree with it, but there's a certain sense in it. If we are going to disconnect the respirator, we can't be, until we turn it off, absolutely certain that the person can't breathe on his own. And so we can turn off the respirator without intending to kill him. Our job would simply be to allow a person who was dying to die. His underlying principle is that we should try to withhold the intention to cause the death of a patient. Now, clearly, in the case of the death of Terri Schiavo, her death was intended. It was intended to cause her death. Ramsey also said, and I quote, Moreover, we could withhold the more invasive interventions while simultaneously withholding an intention that the patient die. But it's hard to believe we could withhold feeding while simultaneously withholding the intention that the patient die. And I have to agree. When you start withholding liquids and feeding, it is your intent that the patient die. Ballander turns to a second sort of case in which intervening to benefit and preserve life means keeping a person alive for what may well be a long period of deterioration and a yet worse death. Suppose he said, for example, a patient suffering from dementia said, experiences an episode where the cardiac arrhythmia causes unconsciousness. Why would we not implant a pacemaker in order to prevent further episodes? Almost certainly, we would provide a pacemaker, he said, if the person were not demented. So why exactly would the presence of dementia make us do otherwise? Now, that's a difficult question. It's a complicated question. And he goes on to analyze it. He says one might reject that conclusion, however, or at least argue with it. The argument would go something like this. In withholding the pacemaker, we are not aiming at this person's death. On the contrary, when all of us choose constantly from among the various lives available to us, we are choosing not only a life, but also certain possible deaths. We are choosing among the various deaths open to us, making some far more likely than others. Now I think what he has in mind here is people who engage in risky hobbies like skydiving and others, where they actually do take chances. People do mountain climbings on the very high peaks where a certain number of them die. He goes on to say, this does not amount to aiming at or intending death when we do that. So we might decline the pacemaker for a demented loved one, choosing thereby a death likely from cardiac arrest rather than a death from other causes at the end of a long period of dementia. And it's hard to listen to think of that and not consider, well, that's not a bad idea, it seems to me. Mylander considers it a serious response, but says he doesn't find it persuasive. Its flaw, he said, is that it's grounded less in a desire to benefit the life that the patient has than to ask whether continued life would be a benefit. Hence, for as long as he lives on, our decision deprives him of benefits well within our power without burdening him greatly. That's what we would do if we gave him a pacemaker. Thus, our desire to orchestrate the circumstances of death, to see that he dies from cardiac problems rather than as the end result of a decade of dementia, deflects our focus from helping him to live better for as long as he does live. Now, one of the things I thought was fascinating, and it illustrates, again, the idea of worldview, the platform from which a person views the world. Mylander says that death means, after all, the defeat of our desire to shape the circumstances of our life. Trying to orchestrate the circumstances of death has the look, therefore, of one last attempt to be what we are not. the author of the story of our life or the life of another. You know, this brought to mind a passage in the Bible that probably helps some of us inform our decisions. It's in Deuteronomy 32, verse 39. God speaking says, See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no God with me. I kill, and I make alive. I wound, and I heal, and neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand. God is the author of life and death, and I'm afraid some of us from time to time forget that and decide that we're going to play God. Euthanasia, said Mylander, is the ultimate attempt at managing death. And it misses the irony that we're attempting to master the very event that announces our lack of mastery. We are exploring now whether some treatment decisions approach too closely to that same managerial attitude, whether they begin to choose death rather than life. And that's a strange thing about our society today. We have gone away from being a culture of life. We are becoming a culture of death, a culture in which people choose to die. We see the results of that in some parts of Islam to this day, a people for whom death becomes the ultimate benefit. They live in a culture of death. And until now, we have lived in a culture of life. Also in Deuteronomy chapter 30, verse 19, God speaks again and says, I call heaven and earth to record this day against you. I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing. Therefore, choose life that both you and your seed may live. Here we are. We are asked to choose life. We have the choice. But again, too many times we are choosing death. There are a couple of more important items.
SPEAKER 02 :
I'll talk about them right after this important announcement. For a free copy of this radio program that you can share with friends and others, write or call this week only and request the program titled The End of the Road. Write to Born to Win, Post Office Box 560, White House, Texas 75791. Or call toll free 1-888-BIBLE44. And tell us the call letters of this radio station.
SPEAKER 03 :
Now I know I have left you with a lot of unanswered questions. Actually, it wasn't my intent to give you the answers. You'll have plenty of friends around you ready to do that. What I'm trying to do is to help us to think through the issues and to look for our basis for making decisions. Where is our home base? Where is our platform? What are the fundamental principles of life that we will use to make those decisions? And since I'm looking at this from a Christian point of view, from a biblical point of view, what can we carry away from the Bible that will help us and will inform us when those times come? Now we all know that Jesus faced a bitter end-of-life decision. In his case, it was not a medical condition, but something altogether different, and something he could have avoided if he wanted to. In the night of the Last Supper, he went to the Garden of Gethsemane and prayed so fervently that he nearly sweat blood. Luke tells a story. It says he came out and went as he was wont to the Mount of Olives. His disciples followed him. And when he was at the place, he said to them, pray that you enter not into temptation. And he was withdrawn from them about a stone's cast. And he kneeled down and he prayed. We know from the gospel accounts that he went away and prayed three times. saying, Father, if you be willing, remove this cup from me. Nevertheless, not my will, but yours be done. And there appeared an angel to him from heaven strengthening him, because this was a hard time for him. And being in agony, he prayed more earnestly, and his sweat was as it were great drops of blood falling down to the ground. He had a terribly hard decision on that night. So hard, in fact, that an angel was sent to strengthen him. And I find myself wondering if the 55th Psalm... formed part of his prayer on that night. You're probably familiar with one verse out of it. It goes like this, Oh, that I had wings like a dove, for then I would fly away and be at rest. Lo, then I would wander far off and remain in the wilderness. I would hasten my escape from the windy storm and tempest. Oh yeah, I can easily understand a desire to get away, a desire to avoid it, to fly away like a dove and not be there. The prayer begins, Give ear to my prayer, O God, don't hide yourself from my supplication. Attend unto me, hear me. I mourn in my complaint and I groan because of the voice of the enemy, because of the oppression of the wicked, for they cast iniquity upon me and in wrath they hate me. This was a painful thing for Jesus, human as he was. that all the accusations of iniquity that were made against him, all of the anger that they expressed toward him, and the outright hatred for a man who in his lifetime had done nothing but good. They cast iniquity upon me, harkens back to Isaiah, who spoke of the time when the Messiah would have our sins laid upon him. My heart is sore pain within me. The terrors of death are fallen upon me. Fearfulness and trembling are come upon me, and horror has overwhelmed me. The facing of death, the end of his life, with the full knowledge of what was coming. It's kind of shocking when you think about the possibility that Jesus actually feared death. But you see, if he had not, he would not have experienced what you and I experience. And I said, oh, that I had wings like a dove. I would fly away and be at rest. I would wander far off and stay in the wilderness, and I would hasten my escape from the windy storm and tempest. For it was not an enemy that reproached me, for then I could have borne it. Neither was it he that hated me that did magnify himself against me. I could have hid from him. But it was you, a man my equal, my guide, my acquaintance. We took sweet counsel together and walked into the house of God in company. You know, nothing could hurt worse than the betrayal of a friend It's hard not to see Judas in this short passage. That night in the Garden of Gethsemane, he said, Judas, do you betray the Son of Man with a kiss?
SPEAKER 02 :
The Born to Win radio program with Ronald L. Dart is sponsored by Christian Educational Ministries and made possible by donations from listeners like you. If you can help, please send your donation to Born to Win, Post Office Box 560, White House, Texas 75791. You may call us at 1-888-BIBLE44 and visit us online at borntowin.net.
SPEAKER 03 :
Gilbert Bylander said, We should not want to think of ourselves as the author of the story of our own life or that of another. Nor, therefore... as one who exercises ultimate authority over life. That's a thought to take away. From time to time, we have some hard decisions as to which of our radio stations we keep and which ones of them we let go, and the number of calls, letters, and comments that come in from a given station help us make those decisions. So let us hear from you. Give us a call or drop us a line. Our phone number again is 1-888-BIBLE44. That's 1-888-242-5344. Our mailing address is Post Office Box 560, White House, Texas 75791. I'm Ronald Dart. Thank you for listening, and remember, you were born to win.
SPEAKER 01 :
Christian Educational Ministries is happy to announce a new full-color Born to Win monthly newsletter with articles and free offers from Ronald L. Dart. Call us today at 1-888-BIBLE44 to sign up or visit us at borntowin.net.
This episode invites you to reflect on the shifting sands of societal values. As standards of good and evil blur, we're challenged to discern truth in a landscape altered by redefining social mores. Drawing from prophetic teachings and modern commentary, our discussion emphasizes the importance of unity and resilience. Learn how to prepare for a world where traditional anchors of judgement and morality are continuously reevaluated.
SPEAKER 01 :
I don't think you understand how hard the years ahead are going to be for us. I don't think we understand how badly we are going to need one another. For a lot of years we escaped thinking about this by postulating a place of safety. All the rest of the dirty, rotten sinners out there in the world would all go through all this disaster that's going to be striking the world in the years ahead. But us, well, since we were more righteous than they were, we would escape. We would be carried away on wings of eagles. We would not have to go through any of it at all. It's hard to imagine how we could assume that in the face of so many scriptures. After all, even the children of Israel went through the first several plagues that the Egyptians had to suffer. And then Jesus came along and told the disciples, he said, they're going to throw you out of synagogues. They're going to beat you. He said, the time will come that he that kills you will think that he is doing God a service. He told his disciples again in Matthew 24 and verse 8, all these are the beginning of sorrows. Then they shall deliver you up to be afflicted and shall kill you and shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake. And then shall many be offended and and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another. It's hard to get your mind around that. It's hard in many ways to even believe it, except for the fact that we believe what we read in the Bible. If there should be a place of safety, no one will welcome it more than I. But in the best-case scenario, the road between here and there whether there is the return of Christ or whether there is the beginning of some sojourn in a place of safety, whatever, take your pick. In a best-case scenario, the road between here and there is long and narrow and hard. And it is going to become harder and harder to obey God and to keep His commandments. The prophets saw all this long ago. In Isaiah, in his fifth chapter, and I'll begin reading in verse 20, said this, Woe unto them that call evil good and good evil, that put darkness for light and light for darkness and bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter. Woe to them that are wise in their own eyes and prudent in their own sight. It's going to become very confusing, frankly, to know right from wrong, to know what is the right thing to do, to know what is the good way in which to walk. Very confusing. And the decisions that many of us are going to face are going to be very hard. Just this last week, I stumbled onto an article in the New Republic by Charles Krauthammer, who is a political pundit. You see him occasionally in Time magazine and other places, a frequent writer. He published an article entitled, Defining Deviancy Up. And it's a play for those who normally read these publications. They knew immediately the play on words that he was using because Senator Patrick Moynihan had published an article not long before entitled, Defining Deviancy Down. And Krauthammer began his article by citing Senator Moynihan and explaining what it was that he meant by his article, by his title, Defining Deviancy Down. Deviancy is a catch-all word for all the kinds of deviant conduct that you see in our society, that is, deviant from the norm, deviant from acceptable. It has to do with illegitimate births, it has to do with crime, it has to do with sociological problems of all manner, including things even like the homeless that you find on the street. And Moynihan's thesis was that because we as a society are being overwhelmed by deviant behavior, and we have come to the conclusion that we really can't cope with it, we simply redefine deviant behavior to make what was previously wrong, right. Moynihan pointed out that since, I believe it was about 1960, illegitimate births in this country have tripled. About one in three babies that are born in this country today, all babies, all races, all colors, about one in three now is illegitimate without a father. So what we have done is we've redefined that. Being a single parent now is an alternate lifestyle. So having your baby out of wedlock is simply a choice that you have made, a choice that is just as legitimate as the choice a woman makes to get married, set up a home, have a husband, have children, and rear children in a normal family environment. I couldn't believe my ears when I was watching last year's Democratic National Convention when Jesse Jackson told the assembled people there that Jesus was the son of an unwed mother. This is a part of the whole pattern of redefining legitimacy, redefining deviancy, so that we can somehow deal with it in this world. He said back in 1955, he cited all sorts of statistics, and I won't bore you with them, the number of people who were in mental hospitals around about this country. That number was reduced by something like 80 to 90 percent, depending upon the stage that you were in, in the last generation. Do you think that that's because we have become much more effective in treating mental illness? No, what we did was redefine mental illness, put all these people back out on the street who were either crazy or sick and allowed them to just go their way until finally they are wandering around, you know, the streets of our cities now with shopping carts and what have you and all their little belongings in them and sleeping on grates and freezing to death in cold weather and dying out there. They are people who are crippled psychologically. crippled emotionally, who cannot cope in our society. But we have redefined them to where they are no longer crazy. They're no longer sick. They are homeless. So that it implies almost that the only thing wrong with these people that you step over as you walk on your way to work somewhere, the only thing wrong with these people who are passed out in a drunken stupor is that they are just homeless. They don't have any place to live. One generation. hundreds of thousands turned out of mental institutions across the country, I guess in the name of freedom. We can't hold them here. They have rights. They have a right to be out there. They have a right to go hungry. They have a right to starve to death. They have a right to freeze in the winter, wherever it is. We have no right, they think, to lock them up. If you believe that's the motivation, then I have some land I'd like to sell you. The truth is, the big motivation was simply budgets. Krauthammer, taking off from Moynihan's concept of defining deviancy down, said that that's part of the story in our society, yes. But what they are also doing is defining deviancy up. That is, society not content with lowering the standards of deviant conduct for the criminal area has begun to redefine the standards of conduct for normalcy in ways that I would not have imagined. I want to read you just a very few excerpts, I'll try not to bore you, from his article, but they are stunning. in their implications. He says Moynihan is right, but it is only half the story. There is a complementary social phenomenon that goes with defining deviancy down. As a part of the vast social project of moral leveling, it is not enough for the deviant to be normalized. The normal must be found to be deviant. Shall I read it again? I want you to be sure you grasp what he's talking about. as a part of a vast project of social leveling. Actually, moral leveling is his term. It is not enough for the deviant to be normalized. The normal must be found to be deviant. One of the things I really want to emphasize out of that is the phrase moral leveling, because the whole idea is to bring us all to the same level. And in order to bring us all to the same level, which direction do you suppose most of us are going to move? Down. In order to bring us all into the same basic category where none of us are any better than anybody else. Reading further, he calls this a moral deconstruction. The moral deconstruction of middle class normality is a vast project. Fortunately, and I think he has his tongue in his cheek here, thousands of volunteers are working on the case. And he begins to define in his article the numbers of ways in which they have been working hard at making these things happening. Krauthammer goes on to at length redefining the, I'm sorry, the redefining of relationships in our country, particularly in relation to sex and specifically of rape. one of his quotations here is after he has given us all the statistics about how what real rape is and what a horrible thing rape is what rape how the statistics on rape a couple of generations ago and a generation ago and then all the way down to today trying to help people understand what has been changing he says this of course behind all these numbers and he gives us all of them and I won't bore you with them behind all these numbers is an underlying ideology of about the inherent aberrancy of all heterosexual relations. Now, do you understand what he's saying? He's saying underlying all of the quotations he's given you out of Feminist's book and others, out of all the quotations and all the statistics about rape and how these things are changing in our country, underlying all of this is an underlying ideology that says that heterosexual behavior is not the norm. It is the aberrant behavior not homosexual, not out of wedlock, not any of those things. As Andrea Dworkin once said, romance is rape embellished with meaningful looks. The date rape epidemic is just empirical dressing for a larger theory which holds this, that because relations between men and women are inherently unequal, sex can never be truly consensual. It is always coercive. Now this is what is being advanced in our society. Start listening for it, folks. This is a part of what I'm talking to you about, about how the road ahead of us is going to be hard because people are redefining the road, changing the road map, putting up new road signs all the time. What this is saying, folks, is simply that these people are advancing the idea that all sex between men and women, because it is between people who are not equal and is never consensual, it is always coercive. Okay, then for sex to be normal, it must be between people who are truly equal, and what does that mean? Then they must both be of the same sex. That is equal in the relationship, and that is not rape, and all heterosexual sex is, by definition, according to some, rape. Think about that for a while. It's staggering. What you and I define as normal sex has now been refined by a large segment of our society, a large and growing segment, as abnormal. He goes on to say, or as Susan Estrich puts it, many feminists would argue that so long as women are powerless relative to men, viewing yes as a sign of true consent is misguided. But then Krauthammer asks, well, if yes is not a sign of true consent, what is? A notarized contract? And if there is no such thing as real consent, then the radical feminist ideal is realized. By the way, that's radical feminist, not just all feminists. The radical feminist idea is realized. All intercourse is rape. Then he says, well, who needs the studies? The incident of rape is not 25% or 33% or 50%. It's 100%. Then Naomi Wolf can write in The Beauty Myth that we have today a situation among the young in which boys rape and girls get raped as a normal course of events. This is just a redefining, folks, of the way relationships work, of how people get along with each other. And this is going on in our society all the time. New Republic is a respected journal. Charles Krauthammer is not some wild-eyed fanatic. He's a respected pundit, well-known. You can see him probably most Sunday mornings, I mean, frequently on Sunday mornings on Meet the Press, talking with the guys at that time. He goes on to explain that the next step in the project is thought control. The campuses have gone far beyond dress codes. You know, we used to kind of be a little bit defensive in Ambassador College about the fact that we had a dress code. You know, we expected students to be neatly dressed when they came to class. We expected them to be neat. We expected the guys to have haircuts and all this type of thing. It's gotten to the place now to where our major universities, state-supported universities, are paid for by your tax money. They've got thought police out there now. They have not just dress codes, they've got speech codes. You can't say certain things. One of the most fundamental values of this country, that is the freedom to say what we think and to think what we want, is being eroded in, of all places, the place where academic freedom, thought freedom, freedom of thought, freedom of expression has historically been held up, a bastion of it, the one that would always, we thought, stand, the colleges and the universities. But that's the way the thing is going. Quoting Krauthammer again, he says, there is, of course, the now famous case of the Israeli-born University of Pennsylvania student, who called a group of rowdy black sorority sisters making a noise outside his dorm in the middle of the night, water buffaloes. His rough translation of the Hebrew, vehema, he was charged with racial harassment. So everybody gets excited about it. A host of learned scholars was assigned the absurd task of locating the racial antecedents of the term. For if a white student leans out the dormitory window and calls black students a name, it must be Somehow racially based. It might not have anything to do, of course, with the fact that water buffalo bellow and they were bellowing like a bunch of water buffalo. But nevertheless, they were all out looking for the racial antecedents. And they found none. He said they should have asked me. I would have saved them a lot of trouble. My father called me behemoth so many times it almost became a term of endearment. And I don't think he was racially motivated. Nonetheless, the university, convinced that there was some racial animus behind that exotic term, and determined not to let it go unpunished, tried to pressure the student into admitting his guilt. Penn State offered him a plea bargain. Proceedings would be stopped if he would confess his guilt and allow himself to be re-educated through a program for living in a diverse community environment. Tell me something. Do you know what we would have called this back in the 70s? Brainwashing. Remember the term? Brainwashing. If you will just apologize, plead guilty to this cause, and if you will just let us brainwash you, we'll drop the charges. Otherwise, we're going to take you in, we're going to go through proceedings and expel you from the university. All of the work you've done is lost. All of the money you've spent is lost. All of the work here is lost. This is nothing short, Krauthammer concludes, and I have to agree with him, nothing short of thought control. He says, this may seem ironic, but it's easily explained. Under the new dispensation, it is not insanity, but insensitivity that is the true sign of deviant thinking. Deviant thinking. Not insanity, but insensitivity. This is the kind that requires thought control and re-education. The one kind of deviancy we are prepared to live with, the other we are not. Indeed, one kind, psychosis, we are hardly prepared to call deviancy at all. As Moynihan points out, it is now a part of the landscape. What a shame. You know, this is the mindset. This is the mindset. If you will just confess, we'll drop the charges. And if you will just confess and you'll go through this course of re-education, This is the mindset that ultimately could lead to your arrest and your being subjected to reprogramming because you're not thinking the way you ought to think. As I say, I don't think we understand how hard the road ahead can become. How hard the prophets tell us that it's going to be. We want to believe what the Bible tells us, but we really are simply not equipped to believe it because we have never lived in such a world. We've never experienced such a world, and the changes that are going on around us are going on so gradually that much of the time we have no idea what it all means. And Krauthammer, with his tongue in his cheek somewhat, with some sarcasm intended here, summarizes it this way. The mentally ill are not really ill, they just lack housing. It is the rest of us who are guilty of disordered thinking for harboring beneath the bland niceties of middle-class life, harboring racist, misogynist, homophobic, and other corrupt and corrupting insensitivities. Ordinary criminality we are learning to live with. What we are learning we cannot live with is the heretofore unrecognized violence against women that lurks beneath the facade of ordinary, seemingly benign, heterosexual relationships. The single parent and broken home are now part of the landscape. It's the Ozzie and Harriet family, rife with abuse and molestation. That's the seedbed of deviance in our society. The rationalization of deviancy reaches its logical conclusions. The deviant is declared normal. The normal is unmasked as deviant. That, of course, makes us all that much more morally equal. The project is complete. What real difference is there between us? And that is the point. Defining deviancy up like defining deviancy down is an adventure in moral equivalence. Now, where we were In Isaiah, the fifth chapter, beginning again in verse 20. Woe to them that call evil good and good evil. This idea of the redefining of standards in society so that we can all be good and so that no one can be looked upon as bad. No one can be considered a failure. No one can be considered as beneath anyone else. This thing is as old as the king of Israel and much older than that. Woe to them that call evil good and good evil, that put darkness for light and light for darkness, that put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter. Woe to them that are wise in their own eyes and prudent in their own sight. Look, we know. We don't need some set of standards outside of the human mind and human heart. We don't need a God to tell us these things. We don't need a law from that God to tell us right from wrong. We are the wise. We know. Woe to them that are mighty to drink wine and men of strength to mingle strong drink. And he's talking about doctrine and ideas, not really fermented alcohol. "...who justify the wicked for reward and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him." Notice that? They justify the wicked for reward. But is there a righteous man? Yeah. But they reach out and they take away the righteousness of the righteous from him. "...a woman who has maintained her virginity all the way until she meets the man of her dreams." He who takes her as a wife and they establish a family together and he goes out and earns a living and she bears children and they build a home together and she considers her career to be the building of a home. She's the Proverb 31 woman who goes out and buys a field and develops that. She makes cloth and sells it to the merchant. She has her own business interest too. But nevertheless, it is a family unit with a father and a mother and a children. Oh, that's righteousness, or at least it used to be righteousness. But there are those who would take the righteousness of the righteous away from it. Therefore, as the fire devours the stubble and the flame consumes the chaff, so their roots shall be like rottenness and their blossoms shall go up as dust. Why? Because they have cast away the law of the Lord of hosts and have despised the word of the Holy One of Israel. Our society, beginning with the preachers, has abandoned the law of God And they don't know right from wrong anymore. And your children can go to school starting with the first grade. No, no, nay, start with kindergarten. And go all the way through, through high school. Go off to a state-supported college. Graduate after four years with a Bachelor of Arts degree. And never in the whole period of time they are there really be told right, that there is a conduct that is right for all men and a conduct that is wrong for all men. that is based on any other kind of standard other than which we set for ourselves. We've long since lost track of who this nation has and who they are. Now they're losing sight of who God is, and our government does not want God in the picture because our government has taken the place of God. The seeds of it, as I said, were sown many years ago, first in the churches, then in society, especially the schools. Remember a time there was an expression and there was a phrase that came out back in the In the 60s, I believe that there are no absolutes, no absolutes, no right, no wrong, just that way. Prophets, they saw it long ago because God decided to speak to Israel when Israel had taken the same road that we are in the process of taking right now. God sent prophets and talked to them. A few pages back in Isaiah 5, I'd like to read a passage to you. Sorry, not Isaiah 5, Isaiah 59 in verse 1. I slipped on my notes. He says, beginning in verse 1, "...behold, the Lord's hand is not shortened that it cannot save. His ear is not heavy that He cannot hear. But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid His face from you that He will not hear." You're in a classic dilemma. You're in trouble. Nothing is working. And so when nothing is working and your society is coming apart, you go on your knees to God, you pray to God and says, why is it that God won't hear us? Why will he not save us? Why won't God do something for us? He said, God's hand isn't short. His ear is not heavy. Your problem is simple. Your lawlessness has separated between you and your God. Your sins have hid his face from you. He won't hear. It's not that he can't. He refuses to. For your hands are defiled with blood, your fingers with iniquity, your lips have spoken lies, your tongue has muttered perverseness. We have exalted violence. Murder touches murder. The blood runs together and touches it. The blood from one murder touches the blood of another murder in the streets. The violence is everywhere. And he says nobody calls for justice. Nobody pleads for truth. They trust in vanity. They speak lies. They conceive mischief. They bring forth lawlessness. Passing on down to verse 7, he says, "...their feet run to evil. They make haste to shed innocent blood. Their thoughts are the thoughts of iniquity, wasting and destruction are in their paths, and the way of peace they just do not know." There is a way. There is a way of peace. You might think of it in terms of a simple road that's laid out, you know. It's been carved out of the trees and out of the forest and it's been graded and compacted and maybe paved over a little bit. It may not be wide, it may not be real easy, but there is a way that if a man will actually get on that road and will walk down that road, it is a way that leads to peace. And he says they don't know what that way is. They don't know where it is. They do not have a clue. They're lost. The reason they don't know is because they assume that, well, we can go all manner of different directions and arrive at the same place. There are many paths to peace. There are many ways of arriving there. And if we can perhaps enter into negotiations, if we can somehow talk our way through this problem, or we can think our way through it, or we can rationalize our way through it, Well, it's thinking and negotiation and rationalization that has brought us to where we are today. They don't know the way of peace. There is no judgment in their goings. They have made them crooked paths. Everybody that goes in their ways will never know peace. Therefore, is judgment far from us. Neither does justice overtake us. We wait for light, but behold obscurity. For brightness, but we walk in darkness. You know, for the first time in my life, I have lost confidence in the jury system. I grew up in this country. I took civics in high school, and I learned what a great country I live in, and I love my country. I love our system of government. I look forward to God's government, but I would rather live here under this system of government than anywhere in the world I know of. And one of the pillars of our system of government was always that if a man is accused of a crime, he can come before a jury of his peers, and they will evaluate the evidence and arrive at a decision. I have lost confidence in the jury system. Now, it's fair for me to say that the black people in this country lost confidence in it a long time ago because they weren't being treated fairly. They tumbled to the fact that there was a loss and a lack and a decay of justice in this country before some of the rest of us did. But we've been treated again and again and again recently to the classic weakness of our justice system. You know what's really wrong with it? It's the fact that we've turned our back on God. We've turned our back on the standards of right and wrong. We've become confused about where the road marks are. The people have moved all the ancient landmarks. We don't know who we are. We don't know what we stand for anymore. Our people have lost confidence in their own capacity to know right from wrong. And when you have a people that don't know the difference between right and wrong, and you pull in this giant jury panel in which you're going to try to collect a group of people, and you ask them, can we judge according to the law? And they, well, yeah, we can judge by the facts. And they get up in the jury box and they haven't a clue. They do not even realize that because they no longer really know right from wrong, that the process of sitting in judgment of their fellow man, be he black, be he white, be he Hispanic, be he Asian, has been corrupted probably beyond recall. And the Bible speaks of this over and over again. It's a recurring theme throughout prophecy. And that is that my people have corrupted judgment. They don't plead the cause of the widow. They don't take care of the people who are broken down. You can buy your way out of a situation. And you're just in a whole lot better situation going into court if you've got a lot of money than you are if you're poor. Is there anybody that really doubts that in our country? When you see what's going on, oh, there are exceptions along the way. Yeah, some rich people finally do get caught. But the truth of the matter is we all know that you're at enormous advantage in this country if you have wealth. And you're at a great disadvantage in this country if you are poor when it comes to judgment. It's just the way we have become. And you want to know something? There's not a thing in the world wrong with the system. What's wrong is with the hearts of the people. The people who turn their back on God, the people who do not know right from wrong, People who have become accustomed to letting the government make decisions for them. And the government defines what is right and what is wrong. It's a terrible tragedy. In verse 10 it says, We grope for the wall like the blind. We grope as if we had no eyes. We stumble at noon as in the night. We are in desolate places like dead men. We roar all like bears and we mourn sore like doves. We look for judgment, but there isn't any, for salvation, and it's far from us. This is not something way off in the future, folks. We're on the threshold of it right now. As Jesus said, this is the beginning of sorrows. It is going to get worse. And that's what I mean when I say that the road ahead is hard and difficult and it's going to be confusing. It's because we're no longer, you would assume that if you got into trouble, you would assume if you began having difficulties that you would be judged fairly. You can forget about that, folks. You can forget about that. that day has passed. For our transgressions, he says, are multiplied before you. Our sins testify against us. Our transgressions are with us. As for our iniquities, we know them. In transgressing and lying against the Lord and departing away from our God, speaking oppression and revolt, conceiving and uttering from the heart words of falsehood, Judgment is turned away backward. Justice stands afar off. And truth is fallen in the street. Boy, what poetry. What powerful poetry. Judgment is just turned away backward. Justice stands afar off. Think of it. Imagine this imagery as though they were personified. Judgment has turned away backward. Just turned his back and walked away. Judgment is standing way over there. Truth? Truth has fallen in the streets and is lying in the dust. The three pillars, frankly, of any society. Judgment, justice, truth. In our case, they seem to be gone. Truth falls or truth fails. And he that departs from evil makes himself a prey. And it's exactly that that I was talking about when I say I don't believe. we understand how hard the road ahead can be, is going to be, because those of us who have tried to make some kind of an effort at turning away from evil are going to become increasingly, I fear, the object of attention in many areas in this country. In Micah, the seventh chapter, there's another interesting little passage, if you'll turn back to the minor prophets, Hosea, Jonah, Micah, actually Hosea, Joel, Amos, Micah. In Micah, Chapter 7, beginning in verse 1. Woe is me, for I am as when they have gathered the summer fruits, as the grape gleanings of the vintage. There is no cluster to eat. My soul desires the first ripe fruit. The good man is perished out of the earth. There is nobody upright among men. They all lie in wait for blood. They hunt every man his brother with a net. What an incredible description of the kind of a world this thing could become as we make our way down to the end. Now, you know, let me put it this way. If you knew that hard times were coming, and I'm talking now, let's say, economically. If you knew we were headed into another period of time like late 1929, 1930, 31, 32. If you knew that, would you prepare yourself? I would. I would. I'd be down at the library trying to understand exactly how that worked. I would be interested in knowing exactly how money, what happened to money, the value of money during that time. I would want to know precisely what I ought to do with what little money I've got. I mean, where do you put it? How do you be secure? I mean, some people, the people in 1929, if they actually took their money and put it in the icebox in about somewhere early October of 1929, they would have been better off than any investment that most of them could have been in at that time. good old cash in the refrigerator or the freezer or the icebox or wherever it could be where it was secure. Because after the fall of the market, after that all began to come unglued, cash was king. If you knew, you would want to be ready for it. If you know hard times are coming, you prepare yourself for them. Now the question is, we read the prophets. We have Jesus' own words for this. We have what Paul said. We have what Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel say. And we all know that these prophets were prophesying relative to the end time. How do you prepare for the things that they were talking about? Well, I have some suggestions. One is, know that there is an absolute right and absolute wrong and that you cannot change what those two things are to suit your own conduct. You understand what I'm saying? Know this, there is an absolute right There is an absolute wrong, and you can't change that. You can't think it through. You can't analyze it your own because, in fact, any kind of standards that are set by yourself are no standards at all because you can change them just as easily as you set them in the first place. How do you do that? You study the law. You study your Bible. You read Christ's words. You begin to inculcate them into yourself so that there is a standard that you know is right and that you will not depart from. And you know that there's a way of life that is wrong and you have chosen that you will not walk in it. And you are committed to it. You're not one that's going to be blown around or wavering when the time comes. The way is going to be hard enough. It's going to be very confusing. And there are going to be times when you're not going to have a clue as to what to do next or what really is right or wrong because there's going to be a determined effort to confuse the whole country about what right and wrong is. Is it a conspiracy? You bet it is. It's not a human conspiracy. You'll search this country from one end to the other to find the person or persons who are responsible for all this. It's a conspiracy at a spiritual level, though, and it has been profoundly effective, and it is going to destroy this country. Know God and know His law and establish your relationship with Him. Jesus said, watch and pray always. that you may be able to escape and to stand before the Son of Man. Somehow, somewhere, sometime, every one of us is going to make a turn in our lives to where we decide, you know, it's time for me to pull up my socks. It's time for me to draw near to God. It's time for me to establish a pattern of behavior that's going to hold me in good stead for the times that are ahead. But the truth is, You will probably live in the last day before Jesus Christ comes, your life, exactly like you are living it, like you lived the last 24 hours that you lived. Unless you make a change, unless at some point in time you're willing to make a decision that you're going to draw near to God so that he may draw near to you, he will return and you still will not have done it. Draw near to God and know him well. and know His law. It is the only way you can avoid the confusion that's settling in on our people, and it's going to get worse rather than better. There are also some other important considerations. I want you to turn back to a parable that Jesus gave, which is a little funny. A lot of people don't understand this. It's in Luke the 16th chapter. Luke chapter 16. He said to His disciples, there was a certain rich man which had a steward, and the same was accused to him that he had wasted his goods. Well, he called him and said to him, how is it that I hear this of you? Give an account of your steward, for I may fire you. I want to complete accounting. You're going to come in here and show me what you've done. The steward said to himself, what am I going to do? He's going to fire me. I'm not strong enough to dig. I'm ashamed to beg. I'm not going to get out there with a cup in my hand and beg from people. What can I do? I know what I'll do. I'll do this so that when I am fired, put out of the stewardship, that there will be somebody who will receive me into their house." In other words, I will have a friend. I'll have somebody who will help me. I'll have someplace I can go. I'll have a bed to sleep in and food to eat. This is what I'm going to do. So he called every one of his Lord's debtors to him and he said to him, said to the first, how much do you owe my Lord? He said, a hundred measures of oil. He said, take your bill and sit down quickly and write 50. In other words, I'm discounting your bill by 50% right here if you'll pay it right now. The man sat down and wrote that bill out. Now, he wasn't going to keep this money. He's giving the money to his master. What he was beginning to do, though, was to make some friends, to buy some favors. Do you think that this fellow for whom he discounted the bill 50% felt like he owed him one? Why, sure. He went to another and he said, how much do you owe? He said, 100 measures of wheat. He said, take your bill and write 80. Let's settle it today. You can have a 20% discount if you'll settle this bill right now. And so the Lord commended the unjust steward because he had done wisely. Now, isn't that curious? I don't know exactly all that was going on, but presumably this man had just allowed these debts to just hang and hang and hang and hang, and the master had come to him and considered that he just hadn't done his job. So he got busy and began to do his job, but because he also thought he was going to get fired, he handed out a lot of favors to to a lot of people. And his boss realized, even though the man was unjust, even though he was not a good steward, he commended him because he was smart in this particular area. He commended him because he had done wisely, because the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light. Now, what's this all about? Jesus said, I say unto you, make to yourselves friends by means of the mammon of unrighteousness, that when you fail, they may receive you into everlasting habitation. Now, what in the world is that talking about? Well, the mammon or the mammon of unrighteousness in the Bible, broadly translated, means commodities. And money, of course, is a commodity in this sense. And generally, it's money, wealth, possessions, but not just possessions. It has more to do with tradable types of commodities. In other words, you have in your hand certain resources, certain physical resources. And one thing is for sure that mammon is. Mammon is a word for physical resources. It has nothing whatsoever to do with spiritual resources. So he says, make yourselves friends, Revised Standard Version says, by means of the mammon of unrighteousness, so that when you fall, actually it's not fail, but when you fall, they may receive you in everlasting habitations. I think what he is saying, as I say, it puzzles a lot of people. I think what it means is this. Do good to people. You never know when one of them could save your life. You just never know. It harkens back to Daniel and the Hebrew children and how they attained favor in the eyes of a particular individual who really saved their lives. So it was with Jeremiah when the city fell. He found favor with a certain individual who saved his life. Make yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness so that when you fail or when you have trouble, when you're up against it, they can actually receive you into their habitations, perhaps. Do good to people. You never know when one of them could save your life. I can, you know, press this out. Don't make enemies you don't have to make. You know, we live through our lives these days. I mean, you know, the world's going on and and there's reasonable peace around us, and we're all frustrated by what we see on the news and so forth, but it doesn't touch our lives very often. And we live very carelessly of our neighbors and our acquaintances, the people we work with and the people we know, very carelessly. And a lot of those people are day by day developing impressions of us, concepts of us, ideas about us that can help us or that can hurt us when the road gets real hard down the way. I was visiting the Tulsa church last week, and they have a really nice facility there, a local church building, which they've been able to acquire. I don't think the cost of it really has run them that much more than what they were paying in hall rental before. Very nice building. As I drove into it, it sets off a little bit isolated by itself. Here's a big sign out front that says, Church of God International. And it tells the time of services, all of which are, of course, on Saturday. Now, not very far down this way is a row of residential houses, and there are residential houses over here. What do those people think about that church in Tulsa? Not important, I guess, what they think about it. It doesn't matter what they think about it. Do you think that? They are in a community. Now, they're behaving themselves. They're not doing any bad things. But those of you who have been around for long enough know that there was a time when the Church of God, Worldwide Church of God, no, Radio Church of God, was getting established up in Big Sandy and they built this big tabernacle. There were all kinds of weird rumors going around Big Sandy and Gladewater about what they were doing out there. I mean, I think somebody was commenting that those concrete gutters, which were just rain gutters, were for the purpose of running off the blood from the sacrifices that they did. These rumors going around the community. When people don't know you, when they don't know why you do the things that you do, they are free to attach any meaning to it they want. And I was talking to people in Tulsa and told them it's important that they be sure that the people in their community know that they are not a threat to them. And I feel quite certain the Tulsa church is going to have a program about as to what they will do about that in the future. I think if we were in that kind of a situation, we'd want to have a visiting program in the community. Not because we, we might assume we don't want a visiting program because we don't think, well, there's no point, those people wouldn't come here anyway. Well, that's quite right. But that doesn't mean that it's not healthy to show up on their doorstep and say, hi, we represent the Church of God International and we want to let you know that we're in the community and that we are here to serve and to be a part of the community. and that you're always welcome to attend our services anytime if you wish, and here's a little handout and so forth, just to let people know what you are doing, why you are doing it, so that they will not assume that you are any kind of a threat in the community. And if the community is doing something, be a part of it. If they're collecting funds for famine relief, be a part of it, because this is making friends of the mammon of unrighteousness, that is, of the commodities or of the physical things of life that you can use to create good relationships with the people where you work, with the people who live around you, who notice that you go off to church on Saturday afternoon with your Bible in your hand and your kids and what have you, and that you're home mowing your grass on Sunday morning. You're different. People who are different are a threat. If you don't believe me, maybe you should read some of the history of the Jews. Read what they have said about some of their experiences. Down through generations, When Jewish people who pose no threat whatsoever to the community in which they live were terribly persecuted on the presumption that because they were different, they were somehow a threat. Do good to people. You never know. Don't make enemies when you don't have to. Be a good neighbor. If your neighbor down the street is sick, go cut his grass for him. Do those types of things that good neighbors do and let people know who you are and make sure that you're not threatening to your neighbors. Don't look like a cultist by withdrawing or being secretive or furtive in the things that you do. Where are you going on Saturday? Oh, well, I'm going to see some friends. It's a funny thing. Not many of us can really lie very effectively without somebody knowing that something's wrong somewhere. Just tell people the truth. Don't tell people that you're allergic to pork as a reason you don't do it. Just tell them plainly, I don't eat pork for religious reasons. But that's okay, I don't mind if you do. But to not be a threat, to be honest with the people you deal with. Watch and pray. Now apart from all the physical things like this you could do, there is one thing I think that is very important, and I referred to it openly, I mean, sorry, in the opening of the sermon when I said, I don't think you understand how hard the years ahead are going to be for us. or how badly we are going to need one another. My most important piece of advice for you is to stay close to the church and to stay close to one another. There is no promise in the New Testament or Old Testament, there is no promise anywhere in the Bible that those of us who obey God, those of us who try to be faithful to God, are going to have clear sailing all the way into the kingdom of God, and you know that. Now, that being the case, I think it's really important to understand that we are going to need one another in ways that we have never imagined. To me, that says that we should stay close to the church, and that means staying close to one another. It means being interested in one another. It means caring about one another. It means knowing when somebody is missing. It means, you know, someone in one of the local churches got real upset because somebody was taking roles. They thought, well, that smacks of a little bit of over-supervision, does it? Well, you know, if we don't know, if we don't take role or do something, if we don't take some kind of notice of who's here, how on earth are we going to know the week that you don't show up because you're sick? The week you didn't show up because you were in the hospital and you weren't able to call and maybe your relative who didn't know to call and the church never found out they were sick until you were cleaned out of the hospital. And then you got aggravated with us because we didn't send flowers. My point is, That we have to stay close to one another. We need one another, and we will need one another in ways that we can never, ever imagine. And therefore, the things that we tend to be alienated about, the things we tend to bicker about, the things we tend to criticize in one another, the things that we tend to, you know, loose strings that we want to pull on, that we don't like what someone else has done, the ways in which we talk about one another, none of these things are really very important. And yet we allow them to divide us. We hurt one another. We allow our feelings to be hurt when they shouldn't be. We allow ourselves to become alienated from others in the church whom we may in the weeks and months and years ahead need for the salvation of our very life. The times ahead are harder than we think or than we can think. And they are times in which we are going to need a church desperately And we are going to need one another desperately. You know, it seems to me that it's a worthy objective then for the church to take whatever steps, to plan whatever programs, to hold on to our membership, to keep our attendance up, to try to keep people from dropping out if there's anything we can do to prevent that from happening. Not so the church can grow for growth's sake, but because we are going to need all the help we can get. And it looks to me like Time is getting closer than we ever would have imagined that it was.
Discover how to integrate ancient biblical teachings into modern life and uncover the enigmatic power of God's instructions. By examining the true meaning of prosperity and reflecting on the delicate work of applying scriptural principles, this sermon offers a practical guide for enhancing one's spiritual journey. With vivid examples and relatable anecdotes, you'll see how routine meditation on these timeless teachings can radically enhance your wisdom, making you like a tree planted by waters that bears fruit in its season.
SPEAKER 01 :
My sermon today presents a small problem to me in the sense that it is almost too simple. And yet, it is a principle which can and will, if you can apply it, change your life forever. Now, are you interested? And I'm talking, of course, changing your life is no trick. You can change it for the worst almost any time, just like that. That part So obviously that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about changing it for the better. It is a principle that you can. It's just so easy. It is so simple. It's within the hands of every person here to apply what I'm talking about, and it will bear results. The principle is expressed in a psalm. It's a psalm that I suspect many of you in this room have memorized. Everybody knows it. And yet, somehow, the principle that I'm talking about in this psalm goes largely unnoticed. I'm not entirely sure why. The psalm is the first psalm. You remember it, don't you? Blessed is the man who walks not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor stands in the way of sinners, nor sits in the seat of scornful. Just such a simple principle. straightforward expression of the obvious. It's a good thing for a man that he not walk in the counsel of the ungodly. The counsel of the ungodly. The counsel of the ungodly. What does that mean? Well, ungodly men in our world today, by and large, adopt a rather cynical posture. It's a posture of looking out for yourself first. It's a policy of, fine, help your neighbor as long as it doesn't cost you too much. You know, it's a cynical, selfish advice about how a person ought to live his life. Counsel, that advice, that way. Nor, he says, stands in the way of sinners. That's not hard to understand. Sinners have a way that they live their lives. Interestingly enough, this verse, and people have pointed this out, I'm sure, before in sermons and sermonettes, it says, not only do you not walk in the way of sinners, You don't stand in it. You don't get out in there and stand and let the currents of that way flow around you. It's a bad place to be. Don't be there. Nor sit in the seat of the scornful. People who, you know, make fun of God. Who scorn godly conduct. These things are well known to all of us, aren't they? What is not so simply understood, though, is exactly how it is that you don't do these things. They are all basically negative, aren't they? The person who doesn't do these things shall be blessed. Okay, instructions on how not to do something are kind of hard to come by. You know, it's a negative. What is it exactly that a person should do with their life in order that they might be in this place, and what difference does it make if they are? Read on. His delight is in the law of the Lord, and in his law does he meditate. day and night. And he shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water that brings forth his fruit in his season. His leaf also shall not wither, and whatsoever he doeth shall prosper. Now I ask you, are you interested in that last sentence applying to your life? So that whatever you do shall prosper. Well, who wouldn't be? Now, the problem, of course, here's another misconception. We often think of prosperity almost entirely in terms of money. If you want to prosper, that means when you write a check, it doesn't bounce. It means that when you get a job, it pays well. That's prosperity. But that's not really the sense in which this is used. If I were going to transfer or translate this expression into modern vernacular, I would say that this man, his life will work. His life works. And I know what it feels like. And I know you know what it feels like to have your life just not work. Things don't work out. Plans don't come to fruition. Things you hope for don't come to pass. Well, here is a very simple, as I said, it's tough to approach it almost because it's so simple. You say, well, what's he telling me this for? Everybody knows that. My problem is how do I do it? And what's funny about it is You've just been told. His delight is in the law of the Lord, and in his law does he meditate day and night. But there also is a misconception. Somehow or other, when we find ourselves back in the law of God, and we read along through Exodus or we read through Deuteronomy, so many of us are hung up on the idea of law as That the law is that the law prescribes, that the law limits, that the law locks us into a certain pattern of behavior. That the law is there to regulate the things we do. And therefore we feel that if the law says you're supposed to put a ribbon of blue on the fringe of your garment, well you sort of feel guilty when you read that scripture if you check, no ribbon of blue. Well, maybe we could wear it on our underwear. You know, maybe some of you do. I don't know. We won't go into that right now. But we look at the law in terms of prescription, in terms of regulation. What's interesting about this passage is that the word is Torah. We're familiar with the word. It's the word the Jews used to describe the first five books of the Old Testament, the Torah. It's the word consistently translated law. I think there may be other expressions for laws and commandments and statutes and judgments, but it is the definitive word for law in the Old Testament. It's Torah. And when you come to the New Testament and you find the Greek word that is used in the same way as Torah, the word is nomos, and it's almost exclusively translated law in the New Testament. What does it mean? Well, what do I mean? What does it mean? It means law, doesn't it? Well, not exactly. If you come down once again dealing with our language, And the way we look at things, and this is what we have to do if we're going to try to communicate to 20th century man. I'm going to try to communicate to you people out here. The problem is that with your background, and so many of you who have been a part of another religious organization which took a very legalistic approach to the law, when I say the word the law of God, something comes to your mind that may not be entirely accurate. The word means, the word Torah means, instruction. Now, let me ask you, do you see any difference between the word instruction, as you understand it, and the word law, as you understand it? Oh, yeah. You don't have a lot of trouble with that. There is a difference. There's a very strong difference. For example, you understand that the law says that you're supposed to drive 55 miles per hour. It's arbitrary. It could just as easily have been 57 or 58 or 54 or 62. And if you get the statistics, they might very well find that the most safe speed to drive is not 55, but it's 57 and a half. But you know, 57 and a half is hard to deal with, so the law says 55. And because it's hard to enforce that right to the line, most police will not pull you over unless you're doing 61 or 62 in a 55-mile-an-hour zone. And we all know that, so we all drive 60 in 55-mile-an-hour zones. What are you laughing about? Well, of course we do. Well, so this is law. It is rooted in what's good for us. It's rooted in these things, but it is regulatory. And if you drive beyond it, you get arrested. Now, when you come to the Old Testament, there are laws, of course, that we understand. You break the law and the death penalty ensues. We understand that law, thou shalt do no murder, be an absolute. And if you murder somebody, God says he who lives by the sword shall die by the sword. All these things we understand. But you see... When the word that is used to gather all these laws together, all the way down to things like wearing a ribbon or a fringe of blue on your garment, all the way down to simple things like how do you handle things when you borrow tools from your neighbor, these laws are all grouped into the word instruction. Now, instruction, the problem with it is it's not always easy to apply in the same way at every time and in every place. You have to think about it. It says here, his delight is in the law of the Lord and in his law does he meditate day and night. What does meditate mean? Think. So he thinks about it. Once again, the problem with so many of these things is that through the Judeo-Christian heritage that's come down to us today, We tend to think in terms of religious exercise. We think of Bible study as a religious exercise. We think of meditation as a religious discipline. We think of prayer as a religious discipline. And they are practiced as discipline. But there's nothing terribly complicated about this. You know what this verse is really saying? It's saying this man's delight or his pleasure is taken in the instruction of God and he thinks about it routinely. It's a routine part of his life. to think about, ponder the instructions of God. Now, is there anyone here who doesn't understand this simple little principle that we're laying out here before you? It's really easy, isn't it? But you see, there is one more misconception that hangs down in our consciousness about these things. Why is it or how is it exactly that it works? Picture yourself, let's say, somewhere around God's throne as maybe an angel standing in the wings or one of the 24 elders watching all the comings and goings of angels going back and forth to the earth. And they've been walking to and fro on the earth and going up and down in it, bringing back their reports to God. And, of course, God is handling prayers daily and routinely coming back and forth. Now, here's God looking down and he sees you. There you are studying your Bibles. And it's been six months now and you have not missed a day studying your Bible. And you have engaged in a religious discipline of meditation on that Bible every day for six months. And God looks down upon you and says, do you see what he's doing? Isn't that a terrific attitude? Let's reward him. What shall we give this person, this woman, this man, who is being so diligent in studying my word and reading the Bible and knowing what the Bible says? I know an angel standing by says, let's give him a new car. I haven't quite got it right. Who's that guy on Price is Right? He has it. You know, when he says a new car, he says it like that is absolutely the greatest prize that they could ever give to anybody, anywhere, anytime. Now, let me ask you this. Honestly, when you think the time for reward comes, reward, can you imagine God giving you a new car as a reward? Now, I will tell you, God's idea of reward is more along the lines of saying, you know, see what a good job he is doing? Let's reward him with more work. Well, now here you are laughing again. But, you know, you've read your Bible, and you know how God thinks. He says, well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful in a few things. I'm going to make you ruler over much. You take control of ten cities. Folks, that's work. He is not going to reward you with a trip to the Bahamas to lie around in the sun and soak up the sun all day. He may well reward you by sending a poor person to your door who needs help. He may reward you by getting to make a sacrifice. That's the way he rewarded Abraham. He was such a good man, he allowed him to go through the process of taking his own son up to a mountainside someplace and sacrifice him. That's what God's rewards are like. But you see, there's a funny thing about this. This is not a reward at all. It's not a reward, it's a result. And there is a difference. God in heaven... does not have to lift a finger to change your life if you do this. It's results. Look at what it says. He is like a tree planted by the rivers of water that brings forth its fruit and its season and its leaf doesn't wither. Do you imagine for a moment that God Almighty in heaven has to lift a finger, say a word, direct a cloud, do anything at all to make a tree that is planted in the right place flourish. Now, he did that a long time ago. Why does he need to do anything else about it? That was all built into the design. The fact that the tree bears fruit and has great leaves is the result of where it's at. Now, can you understand where I'm going? That the man who takes great pleasure in the instruction of God and who thinks about it routinely, will see results in his life. Now, there's a different way of looking at this, and it's an important difference, because I'm afraid so much of the time, when we look forward to the reward of God, and we trust God to give us a reward, but we're anticipating that reward when Jesus Christ comes back to this earth. And we live a lot of our lives and we do good things and we look around and nothing happens. No gifts fall out of the sky. No checks come through the mail. No new jobs show up on the horizon. And while we don't necessarily lose faith in God, we don't have any sense of immediacy about a reward. But you can understand, can't you, the very slow, cumulative process of results when a tree is planted in the right place, in the right season. Can you see it grow? No. Can you actually see the progression of fruit? Can you stand there and watch the bud and see the change taking place? No. But can you come back tomorrow and notice a difference? Possibly. Can you come back the week later and see a difference? Oh, certainly. And when you see those first little green hard peaches on the tree, You can stand and watch it, you know, in vain. But if you come back, you will have a nice, large, yellow, and peach-colored peach. Because they're juicy and ripe. And all this stuff happens as results. And slow. And here it is telling you that the person who delights in the instruction of God and who routinely thinks about the instruction of God will see similar types of results in his own life. They are sure. They are certain. They are slow, but they are cumulative. And over time, they add up. It works. How does it work? Well, let's play a game with it if you want to. Let's work our imaginations a little bit. Let's say you're at home, wherever that is, and let's say that it's a Sabbath morning. And you've got yourself propped up in your favorite chair, your footstool in front of you, a nice hot cup of coffee on the table beside you, and your Bible open in your lap. And you turn your Bible back to what shall we say? Exodus, the 21st chapter, should put us right in the middle of the law. And that's what we're talking about. Exodus 21 and verse 28. And let's consider what we're looking at here and how this might work in your life. If an ox gore a man or a woman that they die, then the ox shall surely be stoned, and his flesh shall not be eaten. But the owner of the ox shall be quit. In other words, not guilty, released, and left alone. Now, if the ox were prone or wont to push with his horn in time past, and it has been testified to his owner that he has done this, and he has not kept him in, and he has killed a man or woman, the ox shall be stoned, and his owner shall be put to death. My, that's serious. Now, you also understand, don't you, what you're reading here? It is a simple, basic law of liability. It says that when you know something that is a danger to other people and you neglect to do anything about it, you are liable. And the Bible seems to put you at extreme liability all the way down to life for life, although it does go on and mitigate that slightly. it says, if there be laid on him a sum of money, I presume instead of putting him to death, then he shall give for the ransom of his life whatever is laid upon him. In other words, if they want every dime he has, every animal he's got, if they want his house and his land, it's gone. He will pay whatever is laid upon him, whether he's gored a son or gored a daughter, according to this judgment, shall it be done to him. Now, if the oxen goes on to talk about the some other things that are involved in it rather curious things having to do with men servants and men servants and the relative difference in value to sons and daughters that is also something to think about but you have to bear in mind it's another time and another place and that these are instructions now the difference really boils down to this I can see some people who are bored with all that and they say well it doesn't apply to me I don't have an ox now on the other hand While you're sitting there, if you just lay your Bible aside for a moment and pick up your cup of coffee and stare out the window for a while and think about this, let's imagine that it comes back to mind that two days ago your dog bit one of the neighbor's children. You know, broke the skin. We checked the dog out. He didn't have rabies and the neighbors weren't mad about it or anything. And then you also recall that the other night you were getting ready to move your dog's food bowl and he snapped at your hand and almost got you. You will remember as you read this that there is a principle of liability. Now you know that it is not only true in God's law, it's true in this world, right? So the next morning you get up, or maybe later that day you get up, load old Fido in the car, take him down to the vet, and have his teeth pulled. Well, that's a lot kinder than having him put to sleep, isn't it? And your neighbor's kids are not going to mind being gummed by your dog. And it would be a lot safer for you if you're moving his food bowl. It makes all kinds of sense to me. They say that a schizophrenic dog will do that kind of thing. And that if you don't want to have them put to death, you can keep them. But you've got to have those teeth pulled. And they'll be just fine. You can keep them for quite a long time. Let me ask you this. Could this dog biting a neighbor's child have any effect on you prospering? Uh-huh. I see heads nodding. You understand what I'm talking about, don't you? Nowadays, when somebody's liable to say, well, you know, you're liable to open the door in the morning, add to a knock on the door and somebody slaps a subpoena in your hands. What's this? Well, your neighbor down the road is suing you because your dog bit his kid. He said he bit him last month and you didn't do anything about it. Uh-oh. Your neighbor's going to own a whole lot more than your dog before all this is said and done. So here is just a simple biblical principle that for the person who sits and reads it, then sits back and thinks about it for a while, and how would this apply to me? How would it affect my life? What does it really mean? It could actually mean the difference between keeping the money you've laid up for your children and your children's children and losing your shirt because of a liability lawsuit. It continues. If a man shall open a pit, or if a man shall dig a pit, verse 33, and not cover it, and an ox or an ass fall in it, the owner of the pit shall make it good and give money to the owner of them, and the dead beast shall be hid. Oh, my goodness. I had been digging a hole in my backyard, you know, the guy says, for a septic tank. And a septic tank, you know, you dig it fairly straight down the sides, and it's not a very big hole. And while you're down there working on it, you may look at the sides of that hole every once in a while yourself and wonder, trying to save some money. And you went in last night and went to bed, you know, and cleaned up, went to bed, and didn't bother putting any barricades around it. You had some sheet plywood you could have put across the top of it over some tuba floors, and you didn't do that either. And here you are on a Sabbath morning, drinking your coffee and reading your Bible, and sure enough it says a pit. Not only could it be an animal that falls in it, it could be one of the neighbor's children that fall in it. Children can't resist a hole in the ground. You know, they can't resist things like they've got to look down in the bottom of it, they've got to drop stones down it, they've got to get close to the edge of it. And edges have a way of caving in. And then the kid gets down there and something could cave in on top of him. You could wind up very liable, and that could be the least of your problems. There could be your conscience that says, I could have done that. You know what's going to happen when somebody draws you into court and says, here it was, you had a pool put in your backyard and you didn't even put up a fence. Why didn't you put up a fence? You dug a hole in your backyard, you put no barricade or light on it, you did not protect it from neighborhood children. Why didn't you do that? You knew your dog was prone to bite. Why didn't you do something? Do you know what you're going to say to the attorney, to the judge, to your neighbor, whoever? I didn't think. Aren't you? You didn't mean to hurt the child. You didn't mean to be negligent. You didn't mean to cause a problem. You just didn't think. His delight is in the instruction of God, and he thinks about it. Routinely. One simple chapter of the Bible here that lays out principles of liability in living with neighbors, and every one of these principles is firmly rooted in our legal system. That we are held liable for things that we know and could have done something and didn't do anything about it. A heightened awareness of this could have more to do with your prosperity in direct financial terms than you can imagine, not to mention your peace of mind. Let's turn over into chapter 22 and take a look at verse 14. Another simple little principle. He says, If a man borrows anything of his neighbor and it be hurt or die, the owner not being with it, he shall surely make it good. Now, I am highly unlikely to borrow anything of my next door neighbor that is alive. But it's not inconceivable that if my lawnmower were broke, I could go over to my next door neighbor's house and borrow his riding lawnmower. I could. However, having just read this scripture, I recall that if this thing breaks while I've got it, I am responsible for making it good. It doesn't matter if his clutch was already nearly worn out. If it goes while I've got it, I'm going to have to make it good. Right? That's all very clear. Maybe what I ought to do Well, let's see what the rest of the scripture says, because actually there is a principle, you know, further than even this in it. Let's see, verse 14. If a man borrow anything of his neighbor, and he hurt or die, the owner of not being with it, he shall surely make it good. But if the owner thereof be with it, he shall not make it good. If it's a hired thing, it came for its hire. I know what I'll do. I'll let my fingers do the walking through the yellow pages, and I'll call up this guy and tell him to bring his mower over here, and he'll cut my grass, and I'll pay him for it. And if it breaks, it's his problem. I've sold up all my liabilities right there. I have to pay that amount of money to get my yard mowed, and if his equipment breaks, that's his problem, not mine. It came for his hire. You know, again, these are such simple things. I told you when I started out, this sermon had a problem with it. But it was so simple. And yet the principles that are being outlined here for us to live our lives by can affect our prosperity. You can understand why then he would say, That blessed is the man who does not walk in the counsel of the ungodly, who doesn't stand in the way of sinners, who takes pleasure in the instruction of God and thinks about it day and night. Whatever he does will prosper. It really will make a difference in his life. Come on down a little further. There are some more principles right in this same section that are really valuable. You shall neither vex a stranger nor oppress him, for you are strangers in the land of Egypt. You know, I don't know why it is, but Down through history, men have been prone to take advantage of strangers, people who don't belong, people who are not part of their community. And these stories have been written time and time again. We are told that our forefathers were strangers at one time, and we have been strangers. Every one of us has been a stranger in a strange place. I thought I'd say a strange person, but not all of us are strange persons. But we've all been strangers. We've been in strange places, and we've been alone. And sometimes it can mean so much to stop by and ask someone directions who's standing alongside the road. and to have them, oh yes, and then give you directions and advice and so forth. Wouldn't it be awful, though, if a person sent you deliberately in the wrong direction, where it wasn't safe for you to go? Could he? Sure he could. We operate a great deal in our world on trust. Now, I know I really don't need to tell you folks to do that, but you see, one of the reasons I don't need to tell you is because you have already come to an understanding of this principle through the teachings of Jesus Christ. But nevertheless... It is something that as children oftentimes we engage in mischief deliberately with strangers. One of the reasons why children hate to change schools is because they know what children in their school have put new kids in their school through. It's a principle. Maybe we ought to consider teaching our children some of these principles. You shall not afflict any widow or fatherless child. This one is rather interesting. If you afflict them in any way, you know, it does not even say deliberately or intentionally or unintentionally. It just says if you afflict them in any way and they cry at all to me, I will surely hear their cry and my wrath will wax hot and I will kill you with the sword and your wives shall be widows and your children shall be fathers. Now, I don't know about you, but he's got my attention. on this one. A lot of you are probably in business situations or operating situations from time to time where you do encounter widows or fatherless children or helpless people of one kind or another. How do you respond to them? You know, it is so easy to take advantage of a widow. We had an interesting situation up in Minnesota this last summer where a woman whose husband had died and left her alone She was a member of the Church of God International, but she was over in, I forget the name, Bemidji, I think, Minnesota, a long way away from any minister, or as far as I knew, from any other members of the church. And she wrote down, she wasn't really asking me for anything, she was just concerned about her situation. This was Minnesota. She had no firewood in yet, and it was starting to get late in the summer. She had her husband's pickup truck that she was trying to sell, and she'd been around to two or three car dealers, used car dealers, asking what it was worth, and she had the very distinct impression that they were trying to steal her pickup truck legally. And she wrote, just kind of helpless and talking about being alone. So I wrote her back and said, well, now do you mind if I give your name? I said, are there people in your area that we know about? They were people on the extended church. Do you mind if I give your name to them? Because you've got to be careful nowadays. You can't just give people's names around willy-nilly because you never know what people are going to do. But I asked her, because of her situation, if she'd mind it, and she didn't mind, so I gave her name to two other people on the extended church who happened to be in Bemidji, and also let Scott Erickson know, who's a minister up in Orem, Minnesota. Well, between Scott and him going down there and working with her, and the other two members in the area helping her out, she's got a load of firewood in for the winter, they sold her pickup for $400 above wholesale, she's got everything all straightened out, and next summer she'll be able to move back near her friends and family back over in St. Paul. And, you know, this is the kind of thing, now, You might ask yourself, why should I need to do this? That's her problem, not mine. People can do that. I know you all wouldn't do that. Why wouldn't you do it? Because of the scriptures, one reason. I'm not bringing something to you that's new to you. You already know what your attitude and your response is supposed to be. But you know, in the various business situations we get involved in across the country, my wife is in real estate. And when she gets a widow... she bends over backwards to do what needs to be done to help. Because she doesn't want, you know, there's a selfish side of the thing of not wanting that widow to cry out to God and say, well, this person took advantage of me. That's one side of it. The other side of it, which is much stronger, is the care that gets bred in us over time because we are routinely delighting and taking delight in God's instructions and we are routinely thinking about them, builds in us an attitude of mind. Now, What do you suppose happens when a widow is helped? When somebody not only doesn't take advantage of her, but bends over backwards to help her in whatever way they can? Well, one of the things she's going to do is to pray and thank God for that person and ask God's blessing for that person. Is that worth anything to you? Another thing she's going to do is she's going to tell people about you. She's going to tell them how you helped her and how you took care of her. And your reputation is going to go up a couple of notches as a result of what you did. Did you ever hear of the law of 250?
SPEAKER 1 :
250?
SPEAKER 01 :
It's a salesman's law. It means for every person you make mad at you, you turn off 250 potential customers because that is the circle that most salespeople, I mean most people know, about 250 people. Which also means in turn that if you really build up a reputation for good, you also affect about 250 people because of the way people network in this world. And your reputation can get stronger and stronger. Now I ask, if any of you people here are in business for yourself, is your reputation worth anything in dollars and cents? Oh my, you know it is. You know how precious it is. And therefore the things that you do to build that reputation, and that's what, you know, some of this has to do with your reputation. And some of it has to do directly with God. I don't know which one you think is the more important. I think I do. But the fact is, if you don't care about anything else except your reputation, you're going to prosper because you think about this law routinely as a part of your everyday life. Notice what it continues to say, work our way down this. It says, if you lend money to any of my people who are poor by you, you are not to be to him as a usurer, neither shall you lay upon him usury. In many cases, the reason why people are in trouble financially is because they lack the discipline or the self-control or the knowledge in many cases to be able to keep their purchasing under control, and because of 18% and 24% interest rate on the things that they buy, they wind up going further and further in debt, and finally they get so far down, there is no way out for them. And so it comes to you and says, could you lend me some money? Now, if you then lend money to a person in that situation, charging interest, all you're doing, you are no better than the finance companies or the loan sharks that have been taking advantage of them and got them there in the first place. Now, you can, if you're dealing with a brother in the church who says, I'd like to borrow some of your money to help me out in my business, and he says, if I make any money, I'll give you some of it, that's okay to take interest in that kind of situation. We're talking about poor people. You are, A, to lend them money. You really aren't supposed to do it. And you're not supposed to charge them any interest. Well, can I take some kind of security, some kind of collateral? Oh, yeah, you can do that. Here it is, right here. If you at all take your neighbor's raiment, to pledge, you shall give it back to him before sunset. That's his covering. It's his raiment for his skin. What's he going to sleep in? It shall come to pass, he cries to me, I will hear, for I am gracious and you are not. That's what he's saying. I'm gracious and you're not, and I'm going to hear him when he cries to me. So, I would suggest you give it back. And since you're going to have to give it back tonight at sunset, what's the point in taking it in the first place? Now, this is not the kind of thing that if you just try to apply this as a regulatory law, you're going to run down more dead ends than you can think about. But if you can think about this as God's instructions, as I said, you can close your Bible and take another sip of your cup of coffee and stare out the window for a while again and think about what this means and how it would impact your life. and about the things that you have already done, and how it worked or how it didn't work, and what really happened when I lent my brother-in-law that $20, what sort of changes were made, and the way I handled it when I asked for it back. How am I doing this? Am I doing this right, according to what I'm told here, or am I running down some wrong pathways in the process? Continue with chapter 23, verse 1. You shall not raise a false report. Don't put your hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness. What could that mean? Well, the one thing I think you could consider is not to be a participator in spreading a rumor. Now, you would say to yourself, well, of course I'm not going to spread it. Why would I spread a false report? Oh, if it was titillating, and if you didn't know that it was false but thought it might be true, and you thought the person you were going to tell it to would be excited by it, why, yeah, I might. Whoops. You shall not raise a false report. That's what you had in the first place. And you're not supposed to put your hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness. Don't help anybody out in this kind of thing. Don't spread this kind of thing around. Simple little principles that you ought to live by. Now, how could this affect your life? I'll tell you one way it can affect your life very directly. Have you ever sat with someone and listened to what they were saying about old Joe or Susan or Joanna and how they were running Joanna down to you? and wondered in your mind what they said about you when they were talking to Joanna? If you didn't, you're not paying attention. Because if they will say this about them, they will also talk about you. Now, that's this dirty old person that's doing this over here. Now we're talking about how does this affect your life? Do you want to be the kind of a person that people don't trust? Well, if you do, if you don't mind being a person that people won't trust, then feel free to talk about your friends to other friends. Feel free to run people down. Because in the process of running down Joanna over here to your friend, you are sowing distrust in your friend's mind toward you. Do you ever consider that? It's the way it works. It is the way it works. Now here's just a simple principle. There's nothing complicated. Just don't get involved in it. You shall not follow a multitude to do evil. Neither shall you speak in a cause to decline after many to twist judgment. Neither shall you countenance a poor man in his cause. That's a curious one. Not to countenance a poor man in his cause. I'm not sure what to make of that, but I think I know one way I would apply that. Some fellow comes along to me and he really doesn't have enough money. to go into business for himself and he wants me to invest and go into business with him. I think what I would probably do after hearing him out is say, friend, I think you ought to get a job and save up some money and maybe you'll be able to go into business for yourself. Because whenever you take a partner in, all you're doing is taking in somebody else that's going to try to tell you what to do. All you're going to have is somebody trying to direct your business. If you take in somebody that's lending you money and expecting to get interest back, you're going to give up so much of your profits it may not be worth it to you. I'll give him advice, but I'm probably not going to give him much else. I may give him a loan that I don't ever expect to see again, and therefore it needs to be of an amount that I can afford to give him, and so on. But to countenance him in his cause or to support him in his project or to finance him in his business, no, I think not. I think not. These are things that a person has to consider. Once again, it's not a part of the law, the Medes and the Persians that is applied in the letter and never altered. These are instructions that you're supposed to think about and find a way to apply them in your life. Now, since we're talking about instructions and not just laws, in a sense, let's move out of the law. Let's go back to the book of Proverbs. The book of Proverbs is an incredible set of instructions. And I want you to imagine yourself once again this time. will have you propped up in bed at bedtime. You know, you've got up in bed, you've tucked your feet under the covers, you've popped up against some pillows, you've got the lamp on by the bed, you've got a glass of milk and two, not three, two of your favorite cookies. Not this kind either, the big, large, ten-inch diameter one, just two small cookies of your favorite kind. And it's bedtime. And I want you to open your Bible. as you propped up there in your bed, to the seventh chapter of the book of Proverbs. This chapter starts by saying, My son, keep my words and lay up my commandments with you. Keep my commandments and live, and my law is the apple of your eye. Bind them upon your fingers. Write them upon the table of your heart. Now, he's not talking about phylacteries. He's not talking about scribbling, you know, Ten Commandments and tying them up around your fingers. That's symbolic language or metaphor for really getting your fingers into it or having the law so close to you that it's on your fingers and it's written in your heart. How do you write things in your heart? You memorize them. That's simple. We all know how to do that. We learn how to do that as children. The book of Proverbs, these sections of these Proverbs and parts of the Proverbs and individual Proverbs cry out to be memorized. They're there for you, and you ought to memorize some of them, the ones that apply to you, that affect your life. You ought to sit there and repeat them over and over again until you can quote them, you know, without looking at the Bible, and so that you'll never forget them. Write them in your heart, because they affect the way you live. Bind them upon your fingers. Write them upon the tables of your heart. Say to wisdom, you're my sister, and call understanding your kinswoman, that they may keep you from the strange woman, the stranger that flatters with her words. For at the window of my house I looked through my casement, and I beheld among the simple ones, I beheld, discerned among the youths, a young man void of understanding. Now, if you kind of get the picture of this, we've got this young oaf with big feet, big hands, and not very much gray matter between the ears. He is very unflatteringly described, but of course he is young and he is awkward and he has not learned a lot of things about life yet. Passing through the street near her corner, he went along the street toward her house. In the twilight, in the evening, in the black and dark night, behold, there met him a woman with the attire of a harlot. She had on a tight leather skirt that just was about this far below the waist, you know, a little short leather-type skirt, kind of the attire of a harlot. and a real tight sort of spandex blouse that revealed everything and concealed nothing. And she was also very subtle of heart, very smooth. It says she is loud and stubborn. Her feet abide not in her house. Now she is outside. Now she's in the street. She lies in wait at the corners. So she caught him and kissed him and with an impudent face said to him, I have peace offerings. That means stakes. I've got some stakes at the house. I have paid my vows this day, and I came forth to meet you. You're the one I came out here to see. Sure she did. Right. This young oaf, awkward, ungainly, not particularly handsome, she came looking for him. She just flatters him. She says, I came diligently to seek your face, and I have found you. I have decked my bed with coverings of tapestry and carved works and the fine linen of Egypt. I have perfumed my bed with myrrh and aloes and cinnamon. You want to know what it smells like? She said and wafts her hand underneath his nose. Come, let us take our fill of love to the morning. Let's solace ourselves with love. The good man is gone. He's not at home. He's gone on a journey and taken a bag of money and he won't be home until the time appointed. We're safe. With her much fair speech, she caused him to yield and with the flattering of her lips, she forced him You know, most of us men think in terms of the reason why women are enamored of us is our macho. We're going to sweep women off our feet. We're going to waltz in and we're going to sweet talk this gal and she's going to go where we take her just because of our masculinity. Nah. She decided. She picked him out. She forced him. Now that's kind of humiliating when you think about it. It says he goes after her straightway like an ox goes to the slaughter, like a fool to the correctionist doctor. This woman reached out and with her little finger she could tuck it around his necktie. Just her little finger around the corner of his necktie and say, follow me. And he'll go anywhere. Anywhere. And so it says he'll go after her until a dart strikes through his liver like a bird hastens to the snare and doesn't know it's for him. she has cast down many wounded yea many strong men have been slain by her her house is the way to hell going down to the chambers of death do you suppose the night before if Jimmy Swaggart had read this scripture and thought long and hard about it the night before that he would have necessarily have been down that same street, at that same motel, with his car, with his license plate, parked out in front of him? Well, there's a chance that he might not have been there. You know, I heard something I have not known recently. Pat Robertson was being interviewed by Larry King, I believe, and he said, you know, that Jimmy Swaggart, when he was 12 years old, was taken to a house of prostitution by his cousins or his uncles, I forget exactly which it was, as a rite of passage. And it had an effect on his life from that time forward. And I can understand how that might well be, because when you're 12 years old, you've got all these things in your mind. You've heard all these stories from all your friends and cousins about what things are like, you know. And if somebody drags you down to a house of prostitution and you get involved in this, you're not able to, you know, to weigh this, to deal with it, to contemplate the implications of it. And I gathered that from this, you know, he has had a lifelong obsession with pornography. Perhaps it is a result of that, but of course, you know, We have, us human beings, have a natural preoccupation with sex. To be drawn, shall we say, to listen to someone or to see someone or to follow through on something like that is a normal thing to happen. And you can easily understand how child molestation, how introduction to sex at a very young age and where that type of thing can lead can cause problems. I don't say this to excuse Jimmy Swagger, but I got to thinking about it and I suspect, I mean, I may be wrong, But I have a feeling that there was a period of time in his life when he wasn't doing that. I have a feeling there was a period of time in his life, in his early ministry and his working toward the ministry, when he was immersing himself in the Bible, because Jimmy Swaggart does know the Bible. I have a feeling there was a time, because of the fact that he had his nose in the Bible, that he came to hate this obsession that he had. He came to loathe and despise many of the things that he had done, and there was no way during that period of time, because he was in the Bible. that he would have done those things I may be wrong but I suspect that that is the case because you know and I think that loathing I don't know if you heard Jimmy Swagger at any time before the scandal struck his ministry or not but I have heard very few people speak as vehemently in condemnation of sin as I have heard Jimmy Swagger and it was almost like a man who was preaching to himself it was like a man who knew the kind of pain and suffering and heartache that it could cause And he was vehement in his denunciation of it. And I suspect that it was because of the way it had affected and maybe even was affecting his life. But you know, men who think they know the Bible are very vulnerable. Because once you have come through the stage of learning it, once you have made those sacrifices and spent the hours in poring over the pages of the Bible, And you have in your mind, you're prone when you come to a scripture like this to pass to say, let's say, Proverbs 7, I know what's there, let's see what's in Proverbs 8. And not take the time to go back and routinely think about God's instruction. For had he done so, he probably, might not have at least, let's say, let's give him the benefit of the doubt, might very well not have been there that night. But of course it takes much more than one time. It takes a continual regular, consistent watering of your little plant for you to come to the place to where it's foreign to you, to where you don't feel like it. Now, maybe you have had this experience in your life to where, as a result of a period of time of Bible study or a period of time of really immersing yourself in God's Word and being aware of what He said, you actually surprised yourself one occasion to realize that some sin of yours, some problem of yours, some thing that had dogged your steps sometime for years, you found yourself surprisingly not even wanting. It was not a matter that you had to resist it, that suddenly for that one moment you didn't want it. Oh, a day or so later you probably wanted it again, and the problem went on. But you see, That closeness to God, to the mind of God, to the thoughts of God, to the ways of God, the teachings of God, has got to have an effect on your life. The book says, He who walks with wise men shall be wise, the companion of fools shall be destroyed. Whoever it is who is having the greatest impact on the way you think is going to have a profound influence on your life. Do you realize that this sermon as I've been going through it, is about something no more complicated than Bible study. Now, if I had started out today saying, okay, this sermon is about Bible study and how you all ought to start studying the Bible, I think I might have lost a few of you at that point in time, but you see, that's what this is all about. Reading your Bible, thinking about your Bible, so that you know the kind of things that God instructs man to do. That's all. And what comes from it It doesn't involve God being pleased with you because you study your Bible, although I'm sure he is. It involves results, like watering a plant, like fertilizer. It's nothing secret, nothing complicated, nothing difficult. Now, to make this work, you need five things. You need your Bible. You need a comfortable place. Like I said, it can be propped up in bed at bedtime, or it can be in the morning with a cup of coffee. You need peace and quiet. You need a system. And, of course, we've already provided for you. If you would like to have it, you can do your own, of course. But we have a Read the Bible in One Year little brochure that you can write in and get from us. We'd be glad to send you a copy of it. And fifth, you need something to keep you in focus. I suggest a pen or pencil and a pad, notepad, because occasionally you'll want to jot down things or you'll want to mark scriptures. I remember as students, Mr. Andy will remember this, back in the old days, some of us had, how was it, 16 colors of pens that we carried around in our briefcases. And I have a feeling if you could, I know you couldn't mind, I suspect also, Mr. Andy, if you could go looking through some of our old Bibles, you'd be rather fascinated to see some of the color codes that show up as we study through them. But you know, as silly in a way as that sounds, it was useful in another way. Actually, it was useful for reasons I don't know if we fully understood. It kept us in focus. Because while I was sitting there saying, let's see, now this particular proverb is about pride. and I'm using red for pride, and I pull my little red pencil out, and I mark all the way around that scripture, my mind is on it. There it is. I'm marking my way around that scripture. And it also served a great deal of benefit in this way. To this day, I can page through the book of Proverbs and find sequentially scriptures, you know, Proverbs about subjects without having to go looking it up in concordances. If someone called on me to give an impromptu sermon, I could open up this object to number one here and say, okay, this one's going to be on Or this one's going to be on zeal. And I can follow through it because of something I did when I was a student in college so many years ago. It helped keep me in focus. It helped me come back to it so that I could think about it and so that it could ultimately make a change in my life. You know, it's not difficult. It is simple. It's easy to do. And it works. You just have to want to do it. Now, I want you to put yourself back in bed again. Imagine yourself propped up on your pillows. Let's go back to that first psalm. The psalms are particularly good about this type of thing. It's a good place to start, and it's a good place to go through. Let's say, where do you want to start? Let's start with the psalms. Here we are, propped up in bed. Our pillows are there, and our glass of milk, and our two, not three, but two cookies. Blessed is the man that walks not in the counsel of the ungodly. nor stands in the way of sinners, nor sits in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the instruction of the Lord. And in his instruction does he think routinely, meditate day and night. It's a part of his life. He shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water that brings forth his fruit in his season. His leaf also shall not wither, and whatsoever he does shall prosper." The ungodly? The ungodly are not so. They are like the chaff that the wind drives away. Therefore the ungodly shall not stand in the judgment, nor sinners in the congregation of the righteous. For the Lord knows the way of the righteous, but the way of the ungodly shall perish. Now, finish your milk, turn out the light, pull up the covers around your ears and get comfortable. and think for a while about what you just read. The results start tomorrow.
What did the First Christians believe about the last days? Forget about the expression the End of the World
—the end of the planet is a long way off. It is plain, though, that the First Christians believed there was to be an end of the age (however one might take that) because that is what they asked Jesus about one day on the Mount of Olives.
They were familiar with the Old Testament prophets and their view of the last days and end of this system. Peter cited Joel with clarity on the day of Pentecost. He would be less than human if he had not seen what looked like the initial phases of the end times. And yet, Christ would not come in his lifetime, for some 2,000 years to come, or (for all we know) many more years yet.
The prophets told of a day of the Lord
, a day of God’s wrath. And while they also saw it as a near-term thing, there is good reason to think that they also saw it as a distant event. It would be so cataclysmic that the destruction would boggle the mind. And they also saw it ushering in a new age. And not only did the First Christians have the prophets, they had Jesus’ Olivet Message to make them a little hypersensitive to prophetic events. Peter and the others thought they saw it coming, but they were also quite careful to avoid crying wolf. And they had good reason for that as well.
SPEAKER 02 :
The CEM Network is pleased to present Ronald L. Dart and Born to Win.
SPEAKER 03 :
What did the first Christians believe about the last days? Forget the expression, the end of the world. The end of the planet is a long way off, like maybe three, four billion years from now. But nevertheless... It's plain that the first Christians believed there was to be an end of the age, however one might take that, because that's what they asked Jesus about one day on the Mount of Olives. They were familiar with the Old Testament prophets. They understood their view of the last days and of this system. Peter cited Joel with clarity on the day of Pentecost, and he would have been less than human if he had not seen taking place in front of his eyes what looked for all the world like the initial phases of the end times. And yet, Christ would not come in his lifetime, or for some 2,000 years to come, and for all we know, more yet. The prophets were told of a day of the Lord, a day of God's wrath, and while they saw it as a near-term thing, there's good reason to think they also saw it as a distant event, an end-of-the-age event. It would be so cataclysmic that the destruction would boggle the mind, and they also saw it ushering in a new age. Not only did the first Christians have the prophets, They had Jesus' Olivet message to make them, well, a little hypersensitive to prophetic events or anything that appeared to be an end-time deal. Peter and the others thought they saw it coming, but they were also quite careful to avoid crying wolf. They had good reason for that as well. On the Mount of Olives, after they asked Jesus, "'What will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?' Jesus gave them a lot to think about. He had already warned of a future destruction of the temple standing before them. He also said, When you shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is near. Then let them which are in Judea flee into the mountains, let those who are in the midst of it depart out, let not them that are in the countries even enter it. Now, there would be enough warning, it would come in 70 A.D., that the saints would have gotten clear of Jerusalem before it actually took place. History tells us they did. They actually cleared out of that city possibly as long as two years before the Romans finally took it down. So they saw, perhaps, Jerusalem encompassed with armies. Who knows what else they saw? And who knows what else their own prophets revealed to them? They got out. Well, Jesus went on in Matthew 24 to say this, except those days should be shortened. There should no flesh be saved, but for the elect's sake, those days shall be shortened. Now, he's not talking about being saved like you are at a tent camp revival. He's talking about flesh being saved alive, human beings. I don't know what the disciples thought about this. The idea of the destruction of all flesh, was a little beyond their horizon. We thought we could see it coming in the days of the old Soviet Union when we had enough nuclear weapons and hydrogen bomb between us to really wipe out most of the population of the earth. But even then, we couldn't have brought about the end of all flesh. One example I ran across on the Internet some time ago, I saw a graphic laid out of what might happen in the event of a nuclear exchange between Pakistan and India, both of whom have nuclear weapons. And what it showed me was if all of the known weapons that Pakistan would have were all used against India, they showed in a pattern on the map of India the extent of the loss of life from each of them. Now, when you consider a country the size of India and the population of India, it would have been a terrible disaster, but it would not have been the end, not even the end of India, much less of all flesh. The loss of life, who knows, 10, maybe 15 percent of the population of India, but you still got a lot of human beings left to carry on after that. So, you've got to understand, as bad as nuclear weapons are, they don't necessarily herald the end of all flesh. The Russians and the Indians are rational people, and no one has died under a nuclear weapon for more than 50 years. Now, that led me to contemplate the creation of something new for a while, although I had no idea what it might be. But now... We have an irrational, arguably insane leadership emerging in Persia, and all bets are off. Now, living in Texas as I do, I worry more about an al-Qaeda operative smuggling biological weapons across the Rio Grande than I do about nuclear. A mere, what, five years ago, none of us gave a second thought to the reality that's now on our threshold. But Jesus went on to explain to his disciples, Then if any man shall say to you, Lo, here is Christ, or he's over there, don't believe it. There will arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders insomuch that if it were possible they shall deceive the very elect. False Christs, false prophets. What are we supposed to make of this kind of a statement? That they could show signs and wonders. Good grief, if they can show signs or wonders, isn't that of God? No, not necessarily. All the way back in the Law of Moses, we are warned that if a man performs great miracles in your sight and then says, let's go serve other gods, it says not only don't you follow him, you put him to death. We can't very well do that today, but at least we can ignore them. Jesus said, look, I have told you before. So if they shall say to you, behold, he's in the desert, don't go out there. Behold, he's in the secret chambers, don't believe it. For as the lightning comes out of the east and shines even to the west, so shall the coming of the Son of Man be. Hey, what is he saying to us? He's saying the coming of the Son of Man is not going to happen in secret. No one can avoid it. For wherever the carcass is, there will the eagles be gathered together. What a strange thing to say. If I didn't know better, I would say it's out of context. But when you look at it in context, what he is saying is, don't worry. When I come, we will all be together. You won't have to be told about it. So all these idiots who want to tell you that Christ has already come, or he's over here, or he's over there, and giving you all this stuff about Christ this and Christ that, if you're a Christian and you're not with Christ, he isn't here. Immediately after the tribulation of those days, the sun will be darkened, the moon will not give her light, the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken. Now, this is a huge astronomical event. We haven't seen anything like this, nor do we know about anything in recorded human history like this. It seems to be describing a huge meteor shower. Later in Revelation, it will tell us that the stars of heaven fell to earth even as a fig tree casts her untimely figs when she's shaken of a mighty wind. Now, if he was here in East Texas, he would have compared it to a pecan tree shaken by the machine they use to harvest pecans, which leaves little pecans falling all around your head. If it's meteors, of course, that's going to be rather another story. It doesn't take a lot of imagination to visualize the disaster that enough meteors of size striking the earth could would come close to ending human life on the planet. And the spooky thing about this is, we know it has happened before, just not while humans were here. In fact, if you've got a pair of binoculars, go outside on a nice moonlit night and look at the moon, and you will see signs of just exactly this kind of devastation. Then shall appear, he said, the sign of the Son of Man in heaven, and all tribes of the earth shall mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. My, you would sort of think people would rejoice at the return of Christ, in that it would save them from the disaster they brought upon themselves. But no. No. Most of the world, it seems, is going to be very unhappy about the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. He'll send forth his angels with a great sound of a trumpet. That's important. They will then gather together his elect from the four winds from one end of heaven to the other. Now, go back to the fig tree. When his branches tender and puts out leaves, you know that summer is near. So likewise you. When you see all these things, know that it's near at the doors. Verily I say unto you, this generation shall not pass till all these things be fulfilled. Heaven and earth shall pass away. My words will not pass away. Now the disciples can be forgiven for thinking that this was an event that would come in their lifetime. But it appears that Jesus meant that the generation that sees these things start will see them end. But then he throws a caution in their direction. Stay with me through this short break.
SPEAKER 02 :
I'll be right back and tell you what he said. The Real Prophets series, which includes the entirety of the prophet Jeremiah, is available in album form. If you would like to get in on the story from the beginning, write or call and ask for your free introductory CD titled Real Prophets. Write to Born to Win, Post Office Box 560, White House, Texas 75791. Or call toll free 1-888-BIBLE44. That's 1-888-242-5344.
SPEAKER 03 :
So here's Jesus standing in the middle of his disciples, all of them with their eyes as big as saucers because of what he's just told them. And then he says, But of that day and hour knows no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. Now, that is an awfully comprehensive statement, because Jesus at this point seems to even not include himself in it. As it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be in the coming of the Son of Man. For as in days before the flood they were eating and drinking and marrying and giving in marriage until the day that Noah entered the ark, and they didn't know until the flood came and took them all away, so shall be the coming of the Son of Man." So what we're visualizing here is complete normalcy right up to a point. He then said, then there'll be two in the field. One will be taken, the other left. Two women will be grinding at the mill. The one will be taken and the other left. It's this passage that underlies the left-behind books and the whole idea that in the event of the rapture, this car will be driverless. You may have seen those bumper stickers on cars from time to time. Frankly, I would think maybe if instead of putting the bumper sticker on a car, people ought not to be allowed to drive the car, but never mind, I'll go a different direction. And one could wonder, with all the events preceding, how would anyone still be working or getting married? I think part of the problem arises with the interpretation of the word rendered taken. I think it's a reasonably good translation, but taken where and taken how? Well, Jesus made this statement in another place, Luke 21, 20. When you shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation is near. Then let them which are in Judea flee to the mountains. Let them who are in the midst of it get out. Another place, Jesus said, if you're out there working in the field, don't go back to your house to pick up anything. Just start walking. If you're on the housetop, don't go back down in the house. Just start walking. Don't try to carry a bunch of stuff with you. You're going to die if you do. And so they were all supposed to just saunter off, nobody paying them any particular attention. If you were working out in the field, you'd just throw your coat over your shoulder and just humming a song, head off toward the nearest foothills. So this separation of people takes place a little before the final judgment, the final destruction of Jerusalem. I can understand how that would be. All of us are still in Jerusalem working away on our craft or doing whatever it is we do. And we see something. We hear something. We learn something. That Jesus told us, when you see this, get out. That would be the point when we all begin to make our move. And so we are separated. We won't be there when the final calamity takes place. So I can easily see, given everything that we've read so far, the first Christians developed a lot of expectations. You can't help yourself. You start imagining things and developing scenarios. Now, continuing in Matthew 24, though, Jesus wants us to understand something. No man knows the day or the hour. Watch, therefore, for you don't know in what hour your Lord does come. Know this, that if the good man of the house had known in what watch the thief would come, he would have watched and would not have suffered his house to be broken up. So this is going to be completely unexpected, except that those who know what to look for will start noticing things. Then he says something I think extremely important. Therefore, be you also ready. Notice the choice of words. This is a small word, but think about it. He didn't say, therefore, get ready. He said, be ready. For in such an hour as you think not, the Son of Man comes. Now, hey, he's talking to his disciples here. Of all the people you'd think would know when it's going to be, they'd be the ones. He says, no, you're going to sit here not thinking. You're going to be reasonably sure it's not right now, and this is when it is. So be ready. So have you heard of anybody setting dates for the return of Christ? He's wrong. Period. End of discussion. Get away from him. So what were the disciples of Jesus to do about this information he had given them? Well, he went on, he said, Who is a faithful and wise servant whom his Lord has made ruler over his household to give them food in due season? Blessed is that servant whom his Lord, when he comes, shall find so doing. I tell you the truth, he'll make him ruler over all his goods. Now, you know, this sounds very mundane, doesn't it? Live your life, do your job, take care of your family, and I will take care of you. That's what it all means. He said, But if that evil servant shall say in his heart, All my Lord delays his coming, he's not coming right away, and he begins to mistreat his fellow servants, to eat and drink with the drunken, just to go living a riotous life with no consideration, the Lord of that servant shall come in a day when he is not looking for him, in an hour that he is not aware of, and will cut him apart and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites. There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. There are two major errors that lurk behind this. One is to cry wolf, to set dates, to publish articles and booklets about earthquakes and famines and all these things that Jesus said would come, overlooking the fact. He said there will be famines, there will be earthquakes, there will be wars and rumors of wars. Be not disturbed. The end is not yet. But there have always been those who did that, it seems, at any given time. They say, oh, this is a sign of the coming return of Christ. That's one of the errors. The other error is to assume that it isn't going to happen in your lifetime or anytime soon. I am persuaded that the first Christians in the main got this straight. They realized that they did not know. They thought they saw the signs, but they avoided crying wolf. Now here is what I take away from all this. Our job is to maintain a level of readiness that we can keep up over time, however long it takes. There is a risk in burning out. There's a risk in crying wolf and becoming desensitized. There's an interesting illustration of all this in a pair of letters from the Apostle Paul.
SPEAKER 02 :
When I come back after this short break, I'll explain. For a free CD of this radio program that you can share with friends and others, write or call this week only and request the program titled About the Last Days. Write to Born to Win, Post Office Box 560, White House, Texas 75791 or call toll free 1-888-BIBLE-44 and tell us the call letters of this radio station.
SPEAKER 03 :
Paul had been in Thessalonica. He had preached there for some time. Opposition arose. He went down to Berea. It was trouble wherever it was that he went, it seemed like. And after he got down to Corinth, as things developed up there, any number of the disciples in Thessalonica had been killed. Persecution was severe in that area. Paul learned about all this, and he wanted to encourage them. And he wrote in 1 Thessalonians 4, verse 13, Brothers, we do not want you to be ignorant about those who fall asleep or grieve like the rest of them who have no hope. We believe that Jesus died and rose again, and so we believe that God will bring with Jesus those who have fallen asleep in Him. Now, again and again, the biblical writers speak of death as a kind of sleep. And what the first Christians believed and practiced is revealed here. He said, according to the Lord's own words, we tell you that we who are still alive and are left until the coming of the Lord will certainly not precede those who have fallen asleep. Now, it's an odd thing in a way, and I don't know of any Christian doctrine today, certainly, that thinks that we go and then later on those people come. It seems rather the contrary. But that's not really exactly what he's driving at. What he is saying here is that we who are alive and are left until the coming of the Lord, this means that while Paul couldn't set dates, it certainly sounds like he expects to be alive when Christ comes back. And you can certainly feel that the Thessalonians could be excused for thinking that's what he said. He said, The Lord himself will come down from heaven with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel, the trump of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we will be with the Lord forever. Therefore, encourage each other with these words. Now, one thing is abundantly clear. All categories of the saints, dead or alive, in all places, meet Christ at the same time. We don't go in waves to meet him. So any rapture of the saints comes at the same time as the resurrection of the dead at the Trump of God, which Paul will later identify as the last trumpet, which is when the resurrection takes place. And it's only at that time that the saints who are still alive on the face of the earth will be caught away. I think that word is rapture is where it comes from, to meet the Lord in the air. Now, Paul knew what he had done here, so he went on with a caution. This letter was read to the congregation. They couldn't take it home with them. And what Paul has just written is so profound, I think a lot of people who were there did not hear what came next as the reader continued to read. Now, brothers, Paul wrote, about times and dates we do not need to write to you, for you know very well. that the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night. Paul is saying, I'm not setting any dates. I don't know when it's going to be. I just think it could be in our lifetime, and here's what I think will happen if it is. While people are saying peace and safety, Paul wrote, destruction will come on them suddenly like labor pains on a pregnant woman, and they will not escape. But you, brethren, are not in darkness, so this day should surprise you like a thief." Now, I can see how they might have taken this to mean that while the world at large would not see it coming, they would. But this is an allusion to the words of Jesus, which had to do with permanent preparedness and being ready, not getting ready because of what we see. You are all sons of the light, sons of the day. We do not belong to the night or the darkness. So let's don't be like others who are asleep. Let's be alert, self-controlled. For those who sleep, sleep at night. Those who get drunk, get drunk at night. But since we belong to the day, let's be self-controlled. Putting on faith and love as a breastplate and the hope of salvation as a helmet. Now, he's really laying it on them pretty hot and heavy as he goes through here. He's doing his best to encourage a church that had suffered severe persecution. But there are always some who miss the point. It turns out a second letter was needed to correct the mistaken impressions of the first. 2 Thessalonians 2. Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to him. He didn't mention the first letter at this point, but that's what he's talking about. We ask you, my brothers, not to become easily unsettled or alarmed by some, by this or that prophecy, report or letter, supposed even to have come from us, saying that the day of the Lord has already come. Now, I don't know what Paul had heard, but he obviously had gotten some feedback from Thessalonica about how people felt about that first letter. In fact, he had inadvertently alarmed them himself with the first letter, which they had not heard everything he said. Don't let anyone deceive you, he wrote, for that day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshipped, so that he sets himself up in God's temple, proclaiming himself to be God. Now, the temple was still standing, so this is a natural allusion to that. From this, some people take it that a temple must be built before Jesus returns. To that I can only say, maybe. Maybe. The Apostle Paul wrote, Remember when I was with you, I used to tell you these things? And you know what is holding him back now so that he may be revealed at the proper time. I have heard endless speculation about that verse. But that's all it is, speculation. The Thessalonians knew what Paul meant because it was a reference to previous teaching that he gave in person that you and I don't have. We can try to construct it from what we know elsewhere, but we should not trust our constructs. He says, Then, verse 8, the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy with the splendor of his coming. Okay. We now got a fairly complete picture of what this is all about. And it's all in concord with what Jesus said would happen, and it probably refers to what elsewhere is called the abomination of desolation. Study this, remember it, and avoid trying to explain it on the data at hand.
SPEAKER 02 :
It'll become clear to those in the know when it comes to pass. The Born to Win radio program with Ronald L. Dart is sponsored by Christian Educational Ministries and made possible by donations from listeners like you. If you can help, please send your donation to Born to Win, Post Office Box 560, White House, Texas 75791. You may call us at 1-877-7000. 888-BIBLE44 and visit us online at borntowin.net.
SPEAKER 01 :
Christian Educational Ministries is happy to announce a new full-color Born to Win monthly newsletter with articles and free offers from Ronald L. Dart. Call us today at 1-888-BIBLE44 to sign up or visit us at borntowin.net.
What did the First Christians believe about the last days—the end time of man on the earth? It may not have been a lot different from what some of us believe today, as I suspect more than a few of us have been disquieted by events in the Middle East. Even if we don’t fully understand all the implications of biblical prophecy, we know that the Middle East looms large at the end time, along with serious loss of life. With the Iranian regime certain to develop nuclear weapons, and with the stated intent to destroy Israel, you have to take this seriously and wonder how much longer are we going to be able to go on this way.
But we aren’t seeing a lot more than the First Christians did, and they can be excused for thinking the return of Christ would be in their lifetime. There were prophets among those First Christians but strangely, as far as the record is concerned, they express little interest in the far horizon. Perhaps, because they thought it wasn’t all that far away.
The activities of the prophets in the church seem to be very timely—that is, concerned with the events of the immediate future. But that doesn’t mean at all that there was not a broader view of prophecy in general and of the last days in particular. In fact, you are probably already thinking about the Book of Revelation. But it is plain that they had a belief system about the last days which was, at first, somewhat off-base. To some extent, this is accounted for by something Jesus said. We’ll find it in Matthew, chapter 24.
I am beginning to think that Americans, along with losing their Christmas spirit—whatever that is—are also losing their sense of humor. A law school in Indiana removed a Christmas tree from its atrium because of complaints. Some folks felt that the tree made them feel excluded. Now apart from the fact that I haven’t a clue what that means, since when did everyone have to feel included in everything that goes on? I am absolutely amazed at how thin-skinned atheists are. They are offended by the very word, God
. In the words of Shakespeare, Methinks milady protesteth overmuch.
I wouldn’t have thought so, but it is beginning to appear that atheists are insecure in their beliefs. They seem to fear, if not God, the idea of God. The law school replaced the Christmas tree with two evergreen looking trees, fake snow and a sled. One of the trees has lights in it. Now there’s an idea. We take down the Christmas tree and we put up an evergreen tree, hang lights, tinsel, colored balls on it, put snow around the base and call it a…tree…for decoration. What’s funny about this is that the Supreme Court has ruled that Christmas trees are legal. They ruled that: The Christmas tree, unlike the menorah, is not itself a religious symbol. Although Christmas trees once carried religious connotations, today they typify the secular celebration of Christmas.
I submit this as exhibit one to demonstrate that we are losing our sense of the ridiculous. One, that the Supreme court of the land should be wasting time on issues like this. Two, did no one notice that Christmas is another form of Christ and Mass. Christ being the God of the Christian faith, and Mass a purely religious ceremony. And yet the Christmas tree is not a religious symbol. Well, I agree that it really is not, but it is hard to call it a Christmas tree and utterly ignore the meaning of the word. How is it that the constitution does not permit a display of the Ten Commandments in the atrium of a courthouse, but will permit the display of a Christmas tree. Not only at the courthouse. We have a National Christmas Tree on the grounds at the White House. What is the real reason why we can have one and not have the other, and what is the holiday all about?
In this episode, we unravel the profound narrative surrounding John the Baptist, the significance of the Annunciation, and the nativity of Jesus. Through an exploration of biblical texts, we question long-held traditions and focus on the extraordinary story of God coming in the flesh to dwell among humans. This is an essential listen for anyone interested in understanding the roots and evolution of Christmas observance.
SPEAKER 02 :
The CEM Network is pleased to present Ronald L. Dart and Born to Win.
SPEAKER 03 :
If you're planning on celebrating the birth of Christ this week, well, I hate to be the one to tell you this, but you're about three months late. Yeah, really. And what's funny about it is the whole story is right there in the biblical account of the birth of Jesus, right in your Bible, but nobody pays much mind to it. You can read it, for example, in Luke 1, verse 26. And in the sixth month, the angel Gabriel was sent from God unto a city of Galilee named Nazareth, to a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph of the house of David, and the virgin's name was Mary. And what follows is the annunciation of the birth of Jesus, and you probably heard it in a hundred little Christmas plays. That is, if you've lived long enough. Real familiar. But did you notice the expression in there? The sixth month? Did you ever wonder about that? It was in the sixth month that the angel Gabriel came to Mary and announced the birth of Jesus. Well, sixth month of what? Well, if it's the sixth month on your calendar, well, that would put the conception of Jesus in June and his birth in, well, nine months later, March. On the other hand, if it's the Hebrew calendar, well, the sixth month in the Hebrew calendar would be September, and that would place Jesus being born in June. So what's with this December 25th business? How on earth did we get the birth of Jesus in December? Well, as it happens, it isn't the sixth month of the Hebrew calendar, and it isn't the sixth month of our calendar. It's the sixth month of something entirely different. For example, let's start reading in Luke 1, verse 5. There was in the days of Herod the king of Judea a certain priest named Zacharias of the course of Abijah. His wife was of the daughters of Aaron. Her name was Elizabeth. Now, the Old Testament name for Abijah is Abijah, and he's talking about the course of Abijah. But most people who read the Bible, unless they've been pretty serious in reading the Old Testament, won't have a clue what that's all about. The priesthood was divided into courses, or, well, divisions, shall we say, to parcel out the duties in the temple throughout the year. And some priests had the duty this week, and some priests had the duty another week. They were divided into courses. All the courses served in the temple during the Feast of Tabernacles, because they needed, with all the work going on, they needed everybody. But beginning the week after the Feast of Tabernacles, the first course of the priesthood went to work and worked for seven days. Each of them worked for one week, beginning on the Sabbath day. Now the course of Abijah was the eighth course and would have been on duty only twice a year. The times are inviolable. They are specified by law. So Zacharias and the rest of the course of Abijah would have been serving only during two weeks of the year, one in early December and the other in mid-June. So Luke starts this whole story with a firm calendar reference. The only possible divergence in it would be between one of two fairly closely defined times during the year. One in mid-June, the other in early December. The account continues saying they were both righteous before God, Zacharias and Elizabeth. They walked in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless, and they had no child because Elizabeth was barren, and they both were now well stricken in years. They're really old people, and they're not thinking about babies at this time. Now it came to pass that while he executed the priest's office before God in the order of his course, Luke is nailing down the fact that this is a certain time of year. early December or mid-June. According to the custom of the priest's office, his lot was to burn incense when he went into the temple of the Lord. The whole multitude of the people were praying outside at the time of incense. And there appeared to him, when he was in there all by himself, an angel of the Lord standing on the right side of the altar of incense. And Zacharias, because he was supposed to be the only person in that place, when he laid eyes on the angel, he was frightened to death. And the angel said, Don't be afraid. Your prayer is heard, and your wife Elizabeth shall bear you a son, and you shall call his name John. That's interesting. Is this an old man still praying for a child? You know, what I suspect has happened here is that the prayer that Zacharias and Elizabeth had made years ago had been heard. But that wasn't the time. This is the time. He says, you'll call his name John. Now, this child is going to be the precursor of the Messiah, the one that you and I come to know as the famous John the Baptist. Now, you'll have joy and gladness, the angel said. Many shall rejoice at his birth. He's going to be great in the sight of the Lord, and he'll neither drink wine nor strong drink. He shall be filled with the Holy Spirit from his mother's womb. Many of the children of Israel shall he turn to the Lord their God. And then he makes this enigmatic statement. He said, "...he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elijah to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just to make ready a people prepared for the Lord." Now, Zacharias seems to have understood this reference, even though it's pretty obscure to us. It's a reference to Malachi, where God said he would send Elijah the prophet before the great and dreadful day of the Lord. His job would be to prepare the way for the coming Messiah. Now, there's no indication that John had any idea that there would be two comings of the Messiah. Most people were expecting the Messiah about this time due to Daniel's prophecy. And, of course, due to the fact that they were under oppression and wanted relief from Rome and only a Messiah, the Deliverer from God, could get them out of their situation. So there was a lot of Messianic fever at the time. And now comes a prophecy to this man that says, Here comes your son who is going to prepare the way before the Messiah. And Zechariah said to the angel, Well, how am I going to know this? I'm an old man, and my wife is well stricken in years. And it's almost as though the angel says, What do you mean how you're going to know this? I'm Gabriel. I stand in the presence of God, and I'm sent to speak to you and to show you these things. And behold, because you're not willing to believe my words, you're going to be dumb and not able to speak until the day they've been performed. So they will be fulfilled, he said, in their season. Well, people waited for Zacharias, and they really marveled that he waited such a long time in the temple. And when he came out, he couldn't speak to people, and they realized that he'd seen a vision in there, for he gestured to them and remained speechless. Well, as soon as the days of his ministration were accomplished, he departed and went to his own house. And after those days, his wife Elizabeth conceived. and hid herself five months, saying, Thus has the Lord dealt with me in the days wherein he looked on me to take away my reproach among men. In those days for a woman not to have children was considered by other people a reproach from God. You know, to be blessed is to have lots of children, and if you didn't have the children, you weren't blessed. And Elizabeth was so full of this thing, so excited by the whole thing, so uplifted by it, she hid herself away and went into seclusion for five months. And in the sixth month, the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth, to a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David, and the virgin's name was Mary. Now, you see, we've caught up with where we were before. The sixth month when that angel came to Mary to announce that she was to become pregnant with the Son of God was the sixth month of Elizabeth's pregnancy. Now, when we realize that Elizabeth's pregnancy started either in December or June, well, then by going six months ahead in both cases, you kind of run a full circle on that. In that case, there are only two months in which Jesus might have been conceived. late December or late June. Now, if you'll do your math on that, running nine months ahead from both of them, then you realize that there are only two possible months in which Jesus might have been born, September or March. And, of course, that leaves us a long way from December. The odds are, and all the indications in the Bible are, that September would be the month in which Jesus was born, which means that if you're celebrating the birth of Jesus this week, You're three months too late. So here we sit in December with a whole Christian world celebrating the birth of Jesus three months late or three months early. How in the world did this happen?
SPEAKER 02 :
We'll talk about that when I come back.
SPEAKER 03 :
1-888-BIBLE-44 You know, there's no good reason why Luke included those references, the course of Abijah and the sixth month and the fifth month and all those things, unless it was to give a seasonal reference to the things that were happening. When we consider that there is no date specified in the Bible for the birth of Jesus, nor are there any instructions to observe His birth, nor any example in the Bible that it was observed, But, you know, if the early church had been following the customs we observe today, you would surely find some reference to Christmas somewhere in the Bible. But you don't. You do find Paul mentioning that he is in a hurry to get to Jerusalem by Pentecost. You do find Luke making reference to the fact that we had to get away from here early sailing because the fast, that is the Day of Atonement, was already passed. There are repeated references in the book of Acts to these holy days, but nothing for either Christmas or Easter. Of course, everyone should know by now that Christmas is a 4th century invention and doesn't have any basis in the Bible at all. But the nativity of Jesus... is really, it could be the most important event in the entire Bible. I know we Christians think the death of Christ and his resurrection is critical, but if he isn't born, if he doesn't come, then none of that ever takes place. And you know, what's funny about this is that in spite of Christmas, the nativity of Jesus is just not very well understood. Let me see if I can explain to you what I mean by that. In Luke's first chapter, in verse 26, we read this. In the sixth month, the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth to a virgin, espoused to a man whose name was Joseph of the house of David. And the virgin's name was Mary. And the angel came in unto her and said, Hail, you who are highly favored, the Lord is with you. Blessed are you among women. And when she saw this angel, she was very troubled at his saying and cast in her mind what kind of a salutation this was. What do you mean the Lord is with me? What do you mean I'm blessed among women? And the angel said, Don't be afraid. You have found favor with God. And behold, you shall conceive in your womb and bring forth a son and shall call his name Jesus, which basically means Savior. He shall be great. He shall be called the Son of the Highest, and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David, and he shall reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there shall be no end. Now, it's hard to imagine what all this meant to Mary. I gather, though, that two or three things come to mind here. She seems to be a courageous woman because while she is troubled by what the angel has said, she isn't at all as frightened, it seems to me, as Zacharias was. And plainly, she understood the significance of what this angel said. He was to be the son of the highest. He was to have the throne of his father David. He would reign over the house of Jacob forever. All this spelled one word for Mary, Messiah. Because in truth, these are the things that the Messiah was expected to do. And as I said earlier, everyone at this time, the Messianic fever was rampant throughout Judea at this time. People were expecting the Messiah. And Mary suddenly finds herself honored with it. There's one thing in this statement that... Most people at that time, I don't think, really understood what the Messiah was to do. Because it says, of his kingdom, there shall be no end. Well, Mary said to the angel, how shall this be, seeing I know not a man? She did not anticipate the Messiah being literally the Son of God. All the expectations were he would be a descendant of David in the normal manner of course. And she did know that her husband Joseph was in David's lineage as she was. And the angel said to her, The Holy Spirit shall come upon you. The power of the highest shall overshadow you. And therefore that holy thing that shall be born of you shall be called the Son of God. And behold, your cousin Elizabeth, she has conceived a son in her old age, and this is the sixth month with her who was called barren. And with God nothing shall be called impossible. And Mary, apparently without much thought, said, Behold, the handmaid of the Lord, be it unto me according to your word. And the angel departed from her. Nine months passed, and it takes us to Luke, the second chapter. It came to pass in those days there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be taxed. And I'll bet you've heard that several times read in the Christmas season. Actually, apparently this was some kind of census that Caesar Augustus was taking. The taxing was first made when Cyrenius was governor of Syria. And everyone went to be taxed, everyone to his own city. We don't know very much about this taxing. Apparently, there was some widespread period of time in which one could actually get this done. Otherwise, there would have been enormous disruption of the whole economy of the whole region if everyone had to quit work at once and charge back to his own town. Rather, I gather that they went back at a time when it was convenient. Well, for Joseph, the most convenient time possible would be the Feast of Tabernacles or possibly Passover if he went down to observe those festivals. Well, everyone went to be taxed to his own city, and Joseph also went up from Galilee out of the city of Nazareth into Judea, into the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David. He went there to be taxed with Mary, his espoused wife, who was great with child. And so it was that while they were there, the days were accomplished that she should be delivered. And she brought forth her firstborn son, and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn. And this, of course, forms the basis for all the crash scenes you'll see around different places through this season of the year, with Mary and Joseph and a little baby in a manger, and sheep around and cattle around, and maybe shepherds standing there with their shepherd's crooks in their hands, worshiping the little baby Jesus. Now, Bethlehem is six or seven miles from Jerusalem. And since this was almost certainly at the time of the Feast of Tabernacles, this would account for the incredibly crowded conditions in Jerusalem, because Jerusalem at this time was invaded by a million campers, probably a million and a half, maybe two million by some estimates. So finding accommodation would be very difficult. And who wants to be under a tent when a child is being born? The census alone would really not account for the kind of crowd that would crowd out Bethlehem as well as Jerusalem. Well, the baby is born. It is laid in a manger, wrapped in swaddling clothes, on straw. It's a beautiful thought and a beautiful scene. Now, I've thought about that a little bit, and I realize that at this time, if you read in different places that there is rejoicing in heaven, for example, over one sinner that repents. But can you imagine the kind of rejoicing that was going on in heaven among the angels at the time when the Son of God was born? I mean, this is the pivotal event in all of creation. This is what the whole thing is all about. This is what we're driving at. This is the Savior of all things. Well, I can imagine there was a lot of back-slapping and rejoicing and happiness among the angels. And I can see some of them getting together and saying, look, we're going to burst if we don't tell somebody about this. So they get permission to go announce the birth on earth to somebody. But to whom? Well, God didn't allow them to go to the king. He didn't bother telling them at all. They found out about a second hand from the wise men that came from the east asking, where's this event? And he said, what? It wasn't to the high priest. In fact, they didn't announce it to anyone in the religious or political establishment in Jerusalem at all. You know what they did? They actually looked to the bottom rung of the social order of the time, sheep herders. They said, let's go tell these sheepherders who are camped out in the field tonight. And there were, in the same country, shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night. Now, everybody knows they wouldn't have been overnighting in the field in December. It's too cold. This was September, and their houses were probably full of pilgrims anyhow, and they were just as happy to be in the field. You know, of all the people in this story, these are the guys I envy. Oh, yeah. They were out there sitting around a campfire telling stories, talking about God, maybe looking forward to the Messiah, because these were religious men. I know they were religious men because they understood the message of the angel. If they had not been religious, if they had not been people who went to synagogue and heard the Scriptures read, the things that the angels told them wouldn't have meant much of anything. They might that evening have been talking about the expected Messiah. Do you think he will come or do you think he won't? And all of a sudden, out of nowhere, one minute it's dark, nothing's happening. All of a sudden there is this man standing in front of them and a brilliance, a light shining around about them out of the heavens that made them all squint and cover their eyes. The experience happening as it did just in an instant must have scared them slap to death. And the angel said, hey, don't be afraid. I'm bringing you the best news possible. I'm bringing good tidings of great joy, and it's to all people. No, no, it's not just to the Jews, not just to the Hebrews. It's to everybody. For unto you, you is born this day in the city of David, a Savior who is Christ the Lord. Now, I've got to assume this message meant something to these shepherds. A Savior? What's that? Well, they were under Roman domination. And they would have understood immediately that a Savior of the house of David, born in the city of David, well, this is Messianic. And he is Christ, or he is the Messiah, the Lord. And this shall be a sign to you. You shall find the baby, wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger. Not in a palace, not with a crown, not in velvet, not in silks. In a manger. And all of a sudden, there was with the angel a huge multitude of the heavenly host praising God and saying, Glory to God in the highest and on earth, peace, goodwill toward men. And that's why I envy the shepherds. I have heard some great choirs in my time, but I would surely love to have heard this one sing that song on that night. It came to pass that that when the angels left them, the shepherds said to one another, let's go to Bethlehem, let's go right now, and let's see what's happened, which the Lord has made known to us. And they came with haste, and they found something. What did they find? I want to talk about that when I come back.
SPEAKER 02 :
For a free copy of this radio program that you can share with friends and others, write or call this week only. And request the program titled, Too Late for Christmas. Write to Born to Win, Post Office Box 560, White House, Texas 75791. Or call toll free 1-888-BIBLE-44. And tell us the call letters of this radio station. What did they find?
SPEAKER 03 :
They found Mary, they found Joseph, and they found a baby. And this is the great marvel of this whole thing. Jesus did not drop down out of the sky full grown. He didn't suddenly appear from nowhere on one day as a 30-year-old man and begin his ministry. He was not some kind of physical manifestation of a spirit being who materialized. Jesus was flesh. He was helpless. He was totally dependent on his mother and Joseph. If they had gone off and left him, he would have died. He had to be nursed at his mother's breast, and he had to be changed when he dirtied himself. Now, I hope that doesn't offend you, because the fact is that is the point of this whole story. What has happened here? Well, John in his gospel doesn't go through the particular descriptions that Luke does. He doesn't need to because the book of Luke by that time was out. But John tells us what happened. In his first chapter, in verse 1, he says, In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him, and without him was not anything made that was made. In him was life, and the life was the light of men. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was God. Now, this statement, it was with God and was God, is a little foreign normally to our way of thinking because we tend to think that things are either one thing or the other. But in this case, the Word was God and also with God at the same time. But then in verse 14 of his first chapter, John says this, And the Word was made flesh. and tabernacled among us. And we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. Well, John says that in the process of the Holy Spirit coming upon Mary and begetting Jesus in her womb, the Word actually became flesh. And what's interesting is it became flesh at the time of conception. For from that time forward, That was the word of God that Mary carried in her womb. What's fascinating is that some authorities suggest that that moment, that is the moment of conception, was the moment of incarnation, and that moment of incarnation took place in late December. But the birth of Jesus did not take place for a long time after that. And in fact, it probably took place right about the time of the beginning of the Feast of Tabernacles. And that expression of John says, The Word became flesh and tabernacled among us ties it symbolically to the Feast of Tabernacles as well. So you can see what I mean when I say if you're observing the birth of Christ this week, you're running about three months late. It's funny that before the first century was out, there were people who were already saying that, well, no, Jesus had not come in the flesh. No, no, Jesus was a spirit. He was not really flesh. He didn't really die because since he was God, he couldn't die. John, in his epistle, chapter 4, verse 1, says this, Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits, whether they are of God. Hereby you know the Spirit of God. Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God. Every spirit that does not confess this is not of God. So John, right off the bat, slams down his hand and says, No, Jesus came in the flesh. Anyone who denies that is the spirit of Antichrist. Why is this so important? Well, the tragedy of Christmas is that the message of the coming of God in the flesh to tabernacle with men is totally lost in all the pagan trappings and commercialism of the season. What does it mean to have a rescuer who knows exactly what it is like to be human, who knows what it is like to suffer pain and humiliation, to suffer abandonment and even death? Because unless we can understand, I mean really understand, the nativity of Jesus, we cannot grasp the reality of his death or of his resurrection. Maybe we ought to rethink this whole Christmas thing. Maybe we really do need to get the birth of Jesus, the birth of our Savior, away from and out of all of the trappings of Christmas. Maybe we ought to move it back to where it really took place in the autumn. When Jesus became flesh to suffer and to die, without a resurrection, he would have been lost forever. And if he had been lost, so would we. No, we don't want to lose sight of the birth of Jesus. It is more important to us, I think, than many of us realize. We weren't born to lose.
SPEAKER 02 :
We were born to win. The Born to Win radio program with Ronald L. Dart is sponsored by Christian Educational Ministries and made possible by donations from listeners like you. If you can help, please send your donation to Born to Win, Post Office Box 560, White House, Texas 75791. You may call us at 1-888-7000. Stay in touch with the new Born to Win with Ronald L. Dart app.
SPEAKER 01 :
This app has all of your favorite Ronald L. Dart radio messages, sermons, articles, and it even has a digital Bible. Simply search on the iOS or Android app store to download it for free today.
As the season of Christmas approaches, many are swept up in its traditions without a second thought. This episode prompts listeners to critically evaluate these customs. Rooted in scripture, our discussion traverses through significant biblical commands, offers introspection on how personal confessions are influenced by symbols, and challenges the pervasive assimilation of pagan customs into Christian practice. Join us in unpacking the significance of observing faith according to biblical teachings, mindful of the delicate balance between celebrating cultural traditions and adhering to divine command.
SPEAKER 01 :
Recently, I've given a couple of three sermons about why we believe one thing or another, why we practice, why we observe the Sabbath day, why we keep the Holy Days. Today, I want to talk about why we do not observe Christmas. Because it really seems to be a highly significant article of faith among many people in our faith. In fact, I think there are people who would just about as soon work on the Sabbath day as it would to put a green wreath with a red ribbon on the door of their houses. Very vehement about Christmas and about the non-observance of Christmas. Why do we believe this? Why do we feel this way? And why is it a part of our practice? I think for many of us it is a natural consequence of the growing conviction that we went through at a time in our life that the Bible was the sole authority for our faith. There's a significant denomination, for example, that's fond of boasting that they speak where the Bible speaks, and they're silent where the Bible is silent. And I think that they themselves have found that discipline a little hard to maintain. But the truth is that whenever one does even lip service to that idea, that we speak where the Bible speaks, we're silent where the Bible is silent, and then they come up against the fact that Christmas is not there, they face an immediate crisis. Because you are either going to do something that the Bible does not advocate and does not instruct, and therefore introduce something that's not in the Bible, or you're going to go back to the Bible and say, I've got to deal with that particular question. Now, this is not to say that the Bible is silent on the subject of holidays or holy days. This was something which, when I first came up against this subject, I had come to believe that the Bible was my authority. In fact, I was involved in an ongoing discussion with another person, another Christian, about different doctrines and ideas, and the one thing we agreed upon was that the Bible was our sole authority, and that whatever it is we were going to come to in terms of beliefs and practices had to be based on the Bible. We weren't going to be dragging anything else into our discussions along the way. So, we found, and it was kind of a surprise to me to find, that the Bible is far from silent on holidays. In fact, that there are seven significant holy days listed in the Bible. In fact, there's even more than that, but there are seven of them that are specifically commanded by God. The problem is, Christmas is conspicuous by its absence from that list. And so, when you start asking the question, why do we not observe Christmas? That's a relatively simple thing. It's not commanded in the Bible. There's no particular reason why one should based upon that. And if one wants to follow the Bible and not add things to the Bible, then you're not going to be observing Christmas on that basis alone. But that wouldn't account entirely for the strength of the feeling that many people in God's church have about Christmas and the non-observance thereof. Now, there are certain historical facts about Christmas that are simply not in dispute, not in any way at all. In Rome, December 25th was the birthday of Mithra, the Iranian mystery god called the son of righteousness. And the connection there is so striking as one can hardly avoid it. December 25th was in the middle of the Roman Saturnalia, and it was the custom in Rome to decorate houses with greenery and lights and to give presents to children and to poor people. And that also has a familiar ring to it. German and Celtic Yule rites were introduced a little later. I looked up Yule, by the way, this morning in the dictionary, and the definition said Christmas, the observance thereof. But in the fine print it said that Yule is Old English for a pagan festival held in midwinter. So the Yule rites included food, greetings, good fellowship, greenery, fir trees, fires, lights, and gifts. So history, and this is not anything I don't feel any particular need to prove this to anyone, because it is so readily acknowledged, so widely acknowledged, just about any source you go to will tell you this. We also know that Constantine, who was probably the most powerful and most influential figure in the early development of Christianity, that is, in the post-apostolic development of Christianity, from about 325 B.C. onward, when he was, quote, converted, end quote, and saw the sign of the cross in the sky, he basically took over and dominated the entire visible Christian church for the remainder of his life. And him being really addicted to sun worship, he introduced a lot of the practices, beliefs, and customs having to do with sun worship into Christianity at that time. There's an interesting article in Britannica. In fact, there's a funny thing in the main encyclopedia, the one I have, which is a 1981 edition, If you go through the main encyclopedia, you don't even find an entry under Christmas. It's all under Christianity. And you go back there and you'll find it salted in a number of different places that are in there. But I found this particular statement rather of interest this morning as I was looking at it. It's talking about the passing of Constantine and how when Constantine passed, that major influence began to disappear from the church. He says, but even after that, Roman paganism continued to exert other permanent influences, great and small, on the church. The emperors passed on to the popes the title of chief priest, in Latin, Pontifex Maximus. The ecclesiastical calendar contains numerous remnants of pre-Christian festivals, notably Christmas. But most of all, this I thought was rather interesting, you might find it so too. The mainstream of Western Christianity owed ancient Rome the firm discipline that gave it stability and shape. Now, know well, the firm discipline and stability that the Western Church enjoyed came not from Judaism, not from the Bible, not from apostolic Christianity. It came from Roman paganism. And that's what Britannica called it. Not merely Roman custom. but Roman paganism. The article goes on to say, Western Christianity combined an insistence on established forms with the possibility of recognizing that novelties need not be excluded since they were implicit from the start. Whatever that means, what they're saying is that they insisted on this stable form, but they did not exclude novelties that might be brought into Christianity to maybe spice things up a little bit, shall we say, make them a little more colorful, a little brighter in the middle of winter. The early church fathers of the 2nd and 3rd centuries, Origen, Clement of Alexandria, Epiphanius, all contended that Christmas was a copy of a pagan celebration. Now these things are historical, they're not even in dispute. Christmas as such did not even enter Christianity really until the 4th century. And that's where it really began to make its inroads and began to be a part of permanent Christian celebration. So it really did not originate with the apostles. It did not originate with the New Testament. It's not there at all, neither is Easter for that matter. It came along about 300 years later. Then there are certain biblical facts that aren't in dispute either. First is that Jesus was not born anywhere near December 25th. You know, this is such a simple thing that it's hardly worth the time. I mean, you go to commentary after commentary after commentary after commentary, and they will basically tell you that, no, no, Christ Jesus wasn't born near December 25th. That's the birthday of Saul Invictus, the pagan Roman sun god, that Jesus was probably born in the autumn. There's pretty well universal agreement on that subject. Shepherds were not still in the fields with their flocks that time of year. Most commentaries will say by the time you get down to December, really after the first of November, it's too cold in the fields. They're no longer out there. And that puts it back into October of a certainty. But the fact is that in the New Testament, just a simple, careful study of that coupled with the Old Testament, you don't really even need anyone's help. You need a concordance and a little patience and a little work. And you can establish the sequence. of the conception of John the Baptist that came at the end of his father's temple duty, which is a fixed date in the Hebrew calendar. He was a particular course of priests. The courses of the priesthood started at a particular time of year. You just simply count off the courses of the priest, the number of years, and you know when John got the vision, or when Zacharias got the vision about the birth of John. And the assumption is that John was conceived shortly after the time he came out of that period of time of duty in the temple. Then you look at the conception of Jesus and the months between the conception of Jesus and John. These things are all carefully laid out in the Bible. Follow the normal gestation cycle, and guess what you find? You find that Jesus was born in the autumn, in the season of the Feast of Trumpets and the Feast of Tabernacles. And so you have essentially the birth of Jesus completely and totally divorced from The time of the present observance of Christmas. Not only that, you find that virtually all the customs connected with Christmas. And I use the word virtually because I want to correct a couple of misconceptions a little later. But virtually everything, certainly the trees, the lights, the giving of gifts, all the pattern of behavior that people go through out here in our society at Christmas time, these things all came from a pagan source and have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the birth of Christ. Here and there you will find A manger scene with a man and his wife and some sheep or maybe some shepherds. And there's a baby in the cradle. And you will find, oh, there's something about the birth of Jesus then that is connected with Christmas. And that's just about it. Of course, there are some stations that you listen to where you will hear what we used to call Christmas carols all the time, which have to do with the birth of Christ. Now, so many of the songs have to do with Christmas. They're like Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer and Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas. And they have absolutely nothing to do with Jesus, the birth of Jesus, or anything of the kind. But then, also a matter not in dispute, is this commandment from the law. In Deuteronomy 12 and verse 28 comes a statement that is so profound, it's inconceivable that anyone could misunderstand it, misapply it, or even assume for a moment that this isn't God's will for all time. In Deuteronomy 12 and verse 28, he says, Observe and hear all these words that I command you, so it will go well with you and with your children after you forever. When you do that which is good and which is right in the sight of the Lord your God. I don't think it's possible for us to really grasp how novel, how new, how profound Scripture the religion was that God was handing down from these people. Now, I say new. It was new to them. It was not really new, for it had been around for a very long time. But what I'm basically saying is how different, how startling and strikingly different it was from the religions of the time all around them. What he is going to tell them is this is totally different, and I expect you to live by it. When the Lord your God shall cut off the nations from before you, where you go to possess them, and you succeed them and dwell in their land, You take heed to yourself that you be not snared by following them after they have been destroyed from before you. Now, you would think that this would be sort of automatic. You would think that here is a land whom God is going to drive out the inhabitants from before us. God disfavors them. God is down on them. God doesn't want them to have anything. He wants you to have their land, and he's going to drive these people out ahead of you, right? Now, you would think that we would know then that what we were bringing with us into this land that God had revealed to us was far superior to any practices, customs, or anything else of the people that God was driving out. In fact, in one place he mentions, don't do these things, for because of these things I am driving these people out from ahead of you. Don't do it. And that you inquire not after their gods, saying, How do these nations serve their gods? Even so will I do likewise. Okay, I got that. That's clear. Do you have any problem with that? He says, Don't inquire after their gods. as to how they worship their gods, and say, well, that's a nice custom. I'll adapt that to the worship of God. Don't do that, said God. I don't want you doing that at all. I remember on one occasion, and this was really one of the turning points for me, I was a Southern Baptist at the time. And the Baptist Standard, which is the official publication of the Baptist Church in the state of Texas, Southern Baptist, I should say, had a rather lengthy little article in it about the pagan origins of Christmases. And I was a training leader at the time on Sunday evening, and I got up and I read that to the class that was there. This was in that season of the year. And I pointed out to them these things. And then I turned to Deuteronomy 12 and read this passage, that all these things were customs of worship, of Mithraism, of Saul Invictus, of the sun god, and all that type of stuff. And here we read in the Bible that we should not adapt these things to the worship of Christ. And here we are doing it. And one of the fellows in that room got up. He said, well, he said, when I see the Christmas tree, I don't think about Baal or Mithra. I think of the new life that we have in Christ. And when I see the snow around the base of the Christmas tree, I don't, you know, I'm not thinking of something pagan. I'm thinking of the purity of Jesus Christ. And the red of an ornament was the blood of Jesus Christ. And he went on with a complete reinterpretation of all the pagan symbols, including the little round balls, which we know what those are, and all that type of stuff, reinterpretion of all the pagan symbols to have special meaning for him about Christ and about what Christ has done. Now, taken in a vacuum, you know, without something else intruding from the outside, there was nothing singularly illogical in what he was doing. And one could easily make the case that that's reasonable, that's sensible. But the problem is, God said specifically... Don't do that. I don't want you fooling around with those symbols. I don't want those symbols attached to me. Those things are things that I hate. And you're going to use those symbols and say, that means something connected with me. That's his response. Listen to what he says. You will not do so to the Lord your God. For every abomination which he hates have they done to their gods. In fact, they have even gone so far as to burn their own sons and daughters in the fire to their gods. Think about that when you think about the little baby we just now blessed up here. These people, with all their quote harmless pagan customs end quote, Went so far as to burn their own children to fire. And God says, I hate those symbols. I hate the symbols. To me, I don't want the smell of it. I don't want to see it. I don't want to think about it. I hate what they do. I hate everything about their religions. And I don't want you doing it. Now, to me, this is fundamental to the reason why. You want to know why we don't observe Christmas? Right there. Deuteronomy 12, verse 28, and the following verses. What things, however I command you, you do that. You don't add anything to it, and you don't diminish anything from it. Now, to tell you the truth, this doesn't leave much room for the introduction of a long list of pagan customs into Christian practice, does it? There's just not a lot of slack in there, not much wiggle room. We don't observe Christmas for the simple reason that God explicitly forbids what Western Christianity has done, and that is to allow novelties to enter into worship, life, and practice of the faith of Jesus Christ. Symbolism is important. To argue that symbolism is not important is to argue that words are not important, because words are symbols. Symbolism is a form of language, and the purpose is to convey meaning and ideas. I mean, over here on the wall we've got a little poster that says, Team Kid Motto. Learning about God, using the Bible, living for Jesus. Those are just words. No, no. They're symbols. A word is a symbol. I mean, T-E-A-M. You put the words up there on the board. We scrambled the letters around, you know, that whole motto, and you might not have a clue as to what the thing even meant. They only have meaning when you put them together in a certain way. And the symbol, T-E-A-M, team, brings to your mind certain concepts. So words are symbols. as are wreaths and red ribbons and fir trees decorated with lights, ropes, and what have you. They are all symbols. They are all evocative. They bring to your mind certain things. And God says, you know, that to him, the Christmas tree does not bring to his mind what it brings to yours. If you, for example, see a Christmas tree and you smell the nice evergreen smell in the living room of a home, it may evoke childhood memories of electric trains and Santa Claus and oranges and nuts in the stocking on a Christmas. It evokes all these ideas in your mind. That is not the idea that it evokes in God's mind. For God, it goes all the way back to the death of Nimrod. to Semiramis faking his resurrection, to all sorts of strange and pagan customs, which in his mind ultimately led to even so far as to the sacrifice and burning alive of their own children. And God says, I hate it, I abhor it, and he said, I don't want you doing that. So the adoption of the symbolism of another God is a very serious matter. It constitutes, mind you folks, a confession of another God. Confession is so profoundly important. In fact, I think that I began to realize this long before I ever came into contact with the churches of our faith. Because in the church that I attended before, the public profession of faith was required. You couldn't go to the preacher in private somewhere and sneak around and say, you know, I want to be baptized and be baptized and go your way. No, no, no, no. Fundamental to that was you walk down the aisle, you shake hands with the preacher, and you publicly confess Jesus Christ. It was required. And in fact, when you get into the New Testament, the idea of the public confession of Jesus Christ in some way in your life is required and expected of you. And Jesus said, if you're ashamed of me before the sons of men, I will be ashamed of you before my Father which is in heaven. If you confess me before the sons of men, I will confess you before my Father which is in heaven. So the adoption of the symbolism of a God has a great deal to say about what kind of a confession you are making. Now the adoption of the symbolism of the Bible involves a number of confessions. I consider, for example, that the observance of the Sabbath day. The abstaining from work on the Sabbath day is a confession of faith in the God who created the world in six days and rested the seventh. He is my God. Someone else is not. The observance of the Feast of Tabernacles is a confession that we are strangers and pilgrims on this earth, that our kingdom, the kingdom into which we belong, is not of this world, that we are not at home here, that we look for another kingdom, another city that has foundations, whose builder and whose maker is God. We're temporary. We're on the road. We're on the march toward the kingdom of God. The observance of the Passover is a confession that Jesus Christ is our Passover lamb, that he died for our sins. That it was my sins that crucified him and put him on the stake. That his sacrifice is what sets us free from sin. You know, you have to confess that. And when you come to observe the Passover in the presence of other people, you actually, when you partake of the wine and the bread, confess before all your brethren that Jesus died for you and that you are renewing your faith in that sacrifice at that time. the acceptance, the observance for seven days of the Days of Unleavened Bread, where we accept the fact that in those seven days, leaven is a symbol, a type of sin. And that we confess that we have been freed from sin, and that we must keep ourselves that way. So by the adoption of all these symbols, we make certain confessions about who our God is, what He expects of us, what our life is like, and what we expect of Him. But the adoption of the symbols of Christmas... invokes an entirely different message. In the modern world, it's hardly even religious, but we do not believe that we have any business perpetuating the myth that Christmas has anything to do with Jesus Christ. So, we do not observe Christmas. But being human, we have a hard time sometimes with balance. I was struck just recently, as a matter of fact, I look in on some of the computer forums online, A forum is a place where all sorts of people post messages for a lot of other people to read, and so you can read what other people have said, and you can put your own message up there for others to read. Recently, someone asked a question. They're really concerned about the problem. What do you do when somebody wishes you a Merry Christmas? Now, I've heard this question many times before, but what was amusing to me was it actually seems to provoke in some people a crisis. Because they began to confess in messages on the phone. Oh, yeah, I find it really upsetting. I don't know what to say. I find myself tongue-tied, totally flummoxed. I don't even know how to respond to people. And there was a whole snowstorm of messages beginning to come in from people about, yeah, what do you do when someone has wished you a Merry Christmas? There's nothing routine about it. To most people who don't observe Christmas, it's a provocation. It's worrisome. It's frightening to have that happen to us. Now, I debated about getting on the thing and suggesting that, well, I would suggest they say to you, Merry Christmas and a Happy Saturday to you. But I thought that that probably would not be well taken. It would surely offend the pure in heart of the forum if it didn't offend the people they told it to. We could reply, you know, Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you, but that might have pagan overtones as well. I'll tell you what you could do. You could try, bah, humbug, and turn on your heel and walk away, be nice and rude about it. That might work. But, you know, it's really, there is, of course, another, I know this is a real unusual idea, but someone says, Merry Christmas. You could say, well, thank you very much. I appreciate that. You're very kind. But what's funny about it is that such a simple little thing would provoke a crisis. That even saying thank you bothers some people. Saying the same to you would really bother some people. And many of the, there was really, several people offered replies, and almost in every somebody out there would take exception to the reply that there was something sinister or pagan or troublesome about the reply. Paul said something about this that I think is very important, that I think sometimes gets lost in our zeal and our diligence and our concern to not observe Christmas. I would say at this time, too, just as a matter for you to think about, the churches in our tradition have tended to be reactive rather than proactive. We have tended to define ourselves more in terms of what we are not rather than in terms of what we are. And it is in the antipathy, it's almost as though we observe the Sabbath in reaction against Sunday observance. And one of the reasons for that was because the way these doctrines were originally perhaps defined to us was done by an advertising man who felt that he had to break you loose from the old product in order to get you to accept the new product. And so consequently, there was a very heavy emphasis on what's wrong with Christmas as opposed to what's right with the observance of the Holy Days, what's wrong with Sunday as opposed to what's right about the Sabbath day. I was always fascinated by Sam Bakayoki's approach, which he says, my job is to sell you on the benefits of Sabbath day observance, and he does a very good job of selling the benefits of it. But something for you to watch out for in yourself is the fact that, you know, when something like this happens, are you reacting against, are you defining yourselves in terms of what you were not rather than defining yourselves in terms of what you are? And give that some thought. Now, on this theme, Paul said this, "...as concerning, therefore, the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice to idols." We know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one. Now, do we all know, can we all agree to that? That an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is no other God but one. And that an idol, therefore, has no power. You know, if it were a Christmas tree, and these are the strangest looking ones, I've never seen a ficus for a Christmas tree before. There is no chance of one of these trees walking over here and throttling one of you in the chair where you sit. They can't move. They have to be carried. They can't even feed themselves. They have to be watered and cared for as plants indoor. They have absolutely powerless, as every idol that has ever been made by man is absolutely powerless. I love the way it's expressed in one of the prophets. He says, you know, here this thing is. You have to actually carve it out of wood. You fasten it with a hammer. You have to carry it around from place to place. It can't even go by itself. And people are afraid of these things. They're worried about these things. And I'm afraid that it almost happens to us that our reactions to Christmas and the like are fear reactions. And that's what I was hearing on this forum when people were really worried sick about how they were going to respond to their neighbors and friends when their neighbors and friends were kind enough to say, Merry Christmas. And they hadn't probably spoken to them all summer long, but now they'll speak to them and wish them a Merry Christmas. An idol is nothing in the world, and there is no other God but one. However, Paul says, there is not in every man that knowledge. For some with conscience of the idol, to this hour eat it as a thing offered to an idol, and their conscience, being weak, is defiled. The implication is, if their conscience were strong, it really wouldn't matter. Because, in fact, Paul says, the meat is meat. It doesn't make a hill of beans worth of difference whether it was offered to an idol or whether it wasn't offered to an idol. He says food doesn't commend us to God, for neither if we eat are we the better, neither if we eat not are we the worse. The food does not make any difference in your relationship with God. However, take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumbling block to them that are weak. For if any man see you who have knowledge sit at meat in an idol's temple, then the conscience of him that is weak would be emboldened to eat those things which are offered to idols. And through your knowledge shall the weak brother perish for whom Christ died. It might not be a big deal for you, but it might turn out to be a very big deal for him. But when you sin so against the brethren, who are you sinning against when you eat meat offered to idols? Interesting. Paul said, when you sin so against the brethren and you wound their weak conscience, then in turn, because of that, you sin against Christ. Wherefore, if food will make my brother to offend, I will eat no food while the world stands, lest I make my brother to offend. So his effort was to try his best to avoid offense, but in the process he told us the idol is nothing. Don't make a big deal out of the idol. You do not have to be afraid of them. One of the prophets back in the Old Testament made a statement very similar to that. You know, here are these idols. I mean, they have to be carried around. Why are you afraid of them? Don't be afraid of them. They are, in fact, nothing. Now, you know, this is not necessarily what I would have expected Paul to say. The actual eating of meat offered to idols is not nearly as important as the offense to a brother. Although elsewhere, Paul will acknowledge that eating meat off her dials is something we should not do. He is, in this particular place, putting it in relationship to the offense of a brother and says it's not as important as that. Now, what I derive from this is that sometimes our reaction to these things, like Christmas and so forth, both not only in public, not only when your barber wishes you a Merry Christmas, but among your own family and friends when you get together, that sometimes our reaction to these things is a bit overdone. Paul, a little later in 1 Corinthians, will develop the thing a little further. He says in chapter 10, verse 19, What do I say then? That the idol is anything? Or that which is sacrificed to idols is anything? I'm not saying that. I am saying this, though, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils and not to God, and I don't want you to have fellowship with devils. You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of devils. You cannot be partaker of the Lord's table and of the table of the devils. Are you going to provoke the Lord to jealousy? Are you stronger than he? Now the fact is that what Paul is telling you here is that you should not voluntarily be partaking of the table of a false god. You absolutely in no circumstances should be involved in that kind of thing. God doesn't want you doing that. All things, Paul said, are lawful for me. That's a funny statement. I think what he is doing here is replying to the Corinthians who were arguing about this matter and saying, look, all things are lawful. I mean, we can do that. That's not a problem. Paul says all things are lawful, but all things are not expedient. Just because it's lawful doesn't mean I ought to do it. All things are lawful, but all things don't edify. Let no man seek his own, but every man another's wealth or well-being. Now here he comes to some very specific instructions for them. You and I can derive some ideas from this about the way things ought to be. Tell me something. Is there anybody in this room that has ever, as far as you know, eaten any meat that has been offered to an idol? Is there anybody in this room that even knows of in your lifetime any meat that has been offered to an idol? No, nobody's doing that now, right? And so consequently it isn't even relevant in one way to us. And yet I think there is a lesson to be learned from this. Paul says this, whatever is sold in the market, eat asking no questions for conscience sake, for the earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof. In other words, you're going in there and you are going to ask, of course, is this beef or is it pork? But as far as how was this animal killed? Was this animal offered to an idol or what have you? Because meat apparently was sold in the marketplace that had either been sacrificed to a false god or that had simply been butchered simply for sale and to sell to whoever came by to buy it. Both kinds of meat were there. And it's awfully hard to tell the difference, I gather, looking at a cut of beef, what they were thinking about when they actually sacrificed the animal. So eat it. Don't worry about it. Which tells me, again, that the idol is nothing, that it has no effect on it, that I need not worry myself over that. But if any of them that believe not, here we've got an unbeliever, not in the church, has no knowledge of Jesus at all, and he invites you to go to a feast, and you are disposed to go, whatever is set before you eat, asking no questions, for conscience sake. You don't have to worry your head about that. It's put in front of you. Eat it. Just assume that it's good. But if any man will say unto you, this is offered in sacrifice to idol, eat not for his sake that showed it, and for conscience sake, for the earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof. Conscience? Conscience, I say, not your own, but of the other. Now, why should I be judged, you might say, of another man's conscience? For if I by grace be a partaker, why should I be evil spoken of for that which I give thanks? I give thanks over it. God blesses it. I eat it. Why should I be worried about somebody else's conscience? Well, whether therefore you eat or drink, whatever you do, do everything to the glory of God. Give it none offense, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles, nor to the church of God, even as I please all men in all things, not seeking my own profit, but the profit of many. that they may be saved. So Paul basically, even though he acknowledges that we should avoid meat's offer to idols, he is making a very strong case of where the real problem and the real concern needs to lie. Now, I've got to tell you something, though, that if you are invited to your mother-in-law's house, along with your wife and your kiddos, on, let's say, the day before Christmas, or maybe even on Christmas Day itself, and you'd be disposed to go, And the great turkey and dressing and so forth is laid out before you in the traditional Christmas dinner. I want you to understand something. The turkey that is before you and the cranberry sauce that is before you and the dressing that is there before you was not offered to an idol. It wasn't. A turkey is a turkey is a turkey. And you don't have to worry your head over the fact that I'm breaking God's law and eating meat offered to idols by eating a, quote, Christmas turkey, and it's only a Christmas turkey because your mother-in-law called it that, on Christmas Day with my family. I mean, there are people who absolutely, under no circumstances, would do a thing like that. The fact is that that turkey is not any different from any other turkey. It's conscience, I mean, it's your conscience and knowledge that is important. Now there is, I think, in this a small metaphor for us. The reason I bring it up for you. Someone recently wrote this. They said, everything that has anything to do with Christmas is pagan and we should have nothing whatsoever to do with it. Right, I got it. We should then never give gifts to children. That has long been associated with Christmas. It is pagan, and we ought not to do it. Think of all the money that's going to save you. No gifts for children. We should never give food to the poor. That's been associated with the Saturnalia, and it's pagan. And therefore, we should not be giving food to the poor. When we get our Thanksgiving food drive together to carry food out to poor families around the community, we shouldn't do that. It's been associated with paganism. It's wrong. However, let me tell you something else that's been associated with Christmas. The birth of Jesus has long been associated with Christmas. Are you prepared to say that the birth of Jesus is paganism? I don't think so. But, you know, there is a difference sometimes between what we consciously will acknowledge with our minds and what we intuitively react to with our heart, with our belly, as it were, in the sense of the feeling that there's got to be something wrong with the birth of Jesus or it wouldn't have been associated with Christmas for so long. I know how absurd that sounds. But sometimes our feelings are not rational. Our feelings aren't sensible. But they are there and they have to be dealt with. There's a strange antipathy among some extreme elements, I would say, to the nativity of Jesus. They don't even know why. But they would be more comfortable with a Bible that did not have the second chapter of Luke in the Bible. Really. The word nativity makes them very uncomfortable. Now, do you know what the word nativity means? You may feel free to look it up if you'd like. It means the birth and the circumstances surrounding the birth of whoever's nativity it is we're talking about. So the nativity of Jesus simply means the birth of Jesus and the circumstances surrounding his birth. The nativity of Jesus is the story of the second chapter of Luke. But if you want to get yourself in trouble in some very, very conservative quarters of our faith, just start talking about the nativity. Or mention a nativity scene, you know, to kind of evoke in the image the mind of a stable and a crib and straw and a baby wrapped in swaddling clothes in it and Mary who's given birth in the stable and shepherds having come to see the newborn king. All that's a part of the nativity in your Bible. And the fact that you also find it in nativity scenes around our hometown tonight, with all lights on them, does not mean that it's not in the Bible or that it is pagan in and of itself. It has been improperly associated with a pagan holiday. The only duty you have is to disassociate it. No more. Not to avoid it. Certainly not to deny it. And one of the things that I was really shocked about not long ago, one Sabbath school teacher was really surprised. She was teaching a group of kids that have kind of grown up in this culture, and she was surprised several of them did not know the name of Jesus' mother. you know, defy you to go find some kids in a local Baptist or Church of Christ or what have you and see that they don't know the name of Jesus' mother. Most of them have probably been in a little play in which one of them played Jesus' mother, and they knew their name was Mary, and so on it went. Now, in our tradition, we solve this tension by acknowledging the nativity of Jesus in the autumn where it surely took place. Our first Sabbath school quarterly on the life of Christ begins quite naturally with his birth, where it really ought to be. Isn't that where you normally would begin the life story of somebody? It was born, and that's where ours begins. We could have started with the preexistence of Christ, but we kind of thought that was a concept for the kids that would be a little older. We hope in time that that lesson will be taught in the autumn. That's generally speaking the kind of annual cycle that we envision as we start doing this is a cycle that begins in the autumn, which is the beginning of the year in that sense, and makes its way around the year back to the Feast of Tabernacles again. And so that that lesson about the birth of Christ would be being taught in the season in which Jesus was born. In our tradition, we believe that this is one way that we confess that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. You know, I don't know how, how we got to doing it, or how the attitude ever got there. But there began to be a funny background doctrine almost, hanging and lurking in the background. John addressed it in the first century, in 1 John 4, in verse 1. He said, Beloved, don't believe every spirit, but try the spirits, whether they are of God. Because many false prophets are gone out into the world. Hereby know you the Spirit of God. Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God. And every spirit that confesses not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God. And this is that spirit of Antichrist, whereof you have heard that it should come, and already it's in the world. Why is that such a big deal? I don't know, but there were people who came to believe, there was almost a belief that Jesus Christ came down to the earth or fell to the earth full grown. And that he was not really flesh and blood at all, that he was a spirit and only appeared to be flesh and blood. There have been a lot of strange doctrines that have come up down through time dealing with Christ and with his circumstances. What is really interesting about the gospel writers is that they are all at pains to let us know that Jesus Christ came in the flesh. and none more so than Luke, who not only goes to the trouble to tell us that Jesus was flesh, but emphasizes, explains, and develops all the concepts related to his physical fleshly birth. I mean, I think to me, what is there that could more clearly emphasize that Jesus Christ was come in the flesh than the realization that he was a baby? A real baby who had to be nourished at his mother's breast, who cried when he was hungry, who cried when he needed to be changed, who cried when all the things that babies cry about, he cried about. I bet he was a good child. But at the same time, he was a normal, flesh and blood, human child. We do not observe Christmas, but there is no reason for us to withdraw from our family and friends at this time of year. We do not observe Christmas, but there is no reason for us to be tense with our family or with our friends at this time of year. There's no reason at all why we should not enjoy songs like Joy to the World or O Come All Ye Faithful or any of the songs that celebrate the coming of God into the world in flesh. You know, you may be driving down the road, hear some of them on the radio in this season. Feel free to sing along with them because they're about Christ. They're about His physical birth. It's a joyous occasion. It wasn't now. It wasn't this season. It was back in the autumn. But, you know, we think about a lot of things about Christ at different seasons of the year. And the winter is not a time when the birth of Jesus is off limits, to talk about it. There's no reason not to do that. Jesus was not born on December 25th, but he was born. He was. And I don't think what could be more gently and profoundly expressed the love of God to man... but that his own son was born in humble surroundings, was a baby who was laid in a feeding trough on a bed of straw, who was nourished at his mother's breast. We should not be negative like Scrooge. We ought to be positive as those who love their Savior and who confess him. We're not really better than the people who observe Christmas. We may be a little bit better informed. And I guess my wish for you at this season of the year is may the meekness and gentleness of Jesus Christ... guide you in this season as you respond to those who choose Christmas to tell us that they care.
Hello everyone and welcome to the Christian Educational Ministries Weekend Bible Study.
Tonight, we present Ronald L. Dart with a study on the Epistle of Jude from the CEM Vault.
To him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you before his glorious presence without fault and with great joy — to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.