body {
margin-top: 30px;
background-color: #eee;
}
.c-broadcast__player, .c-btn--download, .c-broadcast__meta {
display:none;
}
.faq-nav {
flex-direction: column;
margin: 0 0 32px;
border-radius: 2px;
border: 1px solid #ddd;
box-shadow: 0 1px 5px rgba(85, 85, 85, 0.15);
}
.faq-nav .nav-link {
position: relative;
display: block;
margin: 0;
padding: 13px 16px;
background-color: #fff;
border: 0;
border-bottom: 1px solid #ddd;
border-radius: 0;
color: #616161;
transition: background-color 0.2s ease;
text-align: left;
}
.faq-nav .nav-link:hover {
background-color: #f6f6f6;
}
.faq-nav .nav-link.active {
background-color: #f6f6f6;
font-weight: 700;
color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87);
}
.faq-nav .nav-link:last-of-type {
border-bottom-left-radius: 2px;
border-bottom-right-radius: 2px;
border-bottom: 0;
}
.faq-nav .nav-link i.mdi {
margin-right: 5px;
font-size: 18px;
position: relative;
}
.tab-content {
box-shadow: 0 1px 5px rgba(85, 85, 85, 0.15);
}
.tab-content .card {
border-radius: 0;
}
.tab-content .card-header {
padding: 15px 16px;
border-radius: 0;
background-color: #f6f6f6;
}
.tab-content .card-header h5 {
margin: 0;
}
.tab-content .card-header h5 button {
display: block;
width: 100%;
padding: 0;
border: 0;
font-weight: 700;
color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87);
text-align: left;
white-space: normal;
}
.tab-content .card-header h5 button:hover, .tab-content .card-header h5 button:focus, .tab-content .card-header h5 button:active, .tab-content .card-header h5 button:hover:active {
text-decoration: none;
}
.tab-content .card-body p {
color: #616161;
}
.tab-content .card-body p:last-of-type {
margin: 0;
}
.accordion > .card:not(:first-child) {
border-top: 0;
}
.collapse.show .card-body {
border-bottom: 1px solid rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.125);
}
window.console = window.console || function(t) {};
Below is RSR's convenient Fact Checker for the many claims made by popular YouTuber "Professor" Dave in his five part series The Definitive Guide to Debunking Creationists. RSR has debunked this series with our own four part series The Debunking of Professor Dave. Dave Farina is not an actual professor, but instead a failed ex-teacher according to the Discovery Institute.
Creation scientists are quite aware of the Big Bang cosmology doctrine, they simply disagree with it due to the scores of evidence that contradict the Big Bang.
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/big-bang and rsr.org/big-bang-predictions
Fallacy: Misrepresentation, Strawman
No creation scientist has made this claim. Instead, they point out that retrograde planets contradict the Nebular Hypothesis, specifically due to the Conservation of Angular Momentum.
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/big-bang and rsr.org/big-bang-predictions
Fallacy: Strawman
This is of course a childish claim by Farina, and ironic given that it’s creationists who have been thrilled (but not surprised) with the findings of the Hubble and now James Webb space telescopes. For example, there are massive fully formed galaxies where they aren’t supposed to be (Webb Spots Super Old, Massive Galaxies That Shouldn’t Exist). RSR has documented many more failed predictions of the Big Bang.
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/big-bang-predictions
Fallacy: False caricature
Pretty much all the fine tuning arguments used by creationists come from secular scientists. For example, see Rare Earth by Ward and Brownlee.
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/fine-tuning
This was not a prediction, but instead a retrodiction. A paper in Nature magazine describes the particulars of this "prediction" as, "assumed ad hoc to obtain the required [predicted] abundances". In Physics Essays, "The study of historical data shows that over the years predictions of the ratio of helium to hydrogen in a BB universe have been repeatedly adjusted to agree with the latest available estimates of that ratio as observed in the real universe."
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/big-bang-predictions
Fallacy: Cherry-picking
Claims of observed Pop 3 stars is speculation. Daniel Whalen, an astrophysicist at the University of Portsmouth, said “it’s not clean evidence” because” Other piping hot cosmic objects can produce a similar helium II signature”.
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/list-of-star-formation-problems
Fallacy: Speculative evidence
Creationists have several competing theories to explain distant starlight. RSR leans toward either stretch cosmology or the plasma cosmology explanation. Note however that evolutionists also have a distant starlight problem called the "horizon problem" that forced evolutionists to posit the untenable and largely falsified inflation theory.
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/starlight-and-time, rsr.org/plasma
Fallacy: Inconsistency
Professor Dave mentions zircons, but doesn’t want to tell his listeners of a huge, gigantic elephant in the room which is the fact that those zircons have helium in them. Helium is slippery and should have escaped zircons long ago. Dr Russ Humphries set up an experiment with an independent lab that confirmed their slip rate through the material, and found that the zircons were roughly 6000 years old. This is one of many indicators that point to an earth much younger than "4.54 billion years plus or minus 50 million years".
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/list-of-not-so-old-things
Fallacy: Inconsistency
RSR champions Dr. Walt Brown's compelling and evidence-based theory on the origin of radioactivity (link below). Moreover, even evolutionists know that decay rates may have been different in the past: "There has been in recent years the horrible realization that radio decay rates are not as constant as previously thought, nor are they immune to environmental influences. And this could mean that the atomic clocks are reset during some global disaster, and events which brought the Mesozoic to a close may not be 65 million years ago but, rather, within the age and memory of man." – Evolutionist Frederic B. Jueneman, FAIC, Industrial Research & Development, p.21, June 1982
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/origin-of-earths-radioactivity
Fallacy: Unwarranted assumption
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: Coming Soon
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
body {
margin-top: 30px;
background-color: #eee;
}
.c-broadcast__player, .c-btn--download, .c-broadcast__meta {
display:none;
}
.faq-nav {
flex-direction: column;
margin: 0 0 32px;
border-radius: 2px;
border: 1px solid #ddd;
box-shadow: 0 1px 5px rgba(85, 85, 85, 0.15);
}
.faq-nav .nav-link {
position: relative;
display: block;
margin: 0;
padding: 13px 16px;
background-color: #fff;
border: 0;
border-bottom: 1px solid #ddd;
border-radius: 0;
color: #616161;
transition: background-color 0.2s ease;
text-align: left;
}
.faq-nav .nav-link:hover {
background-color: #f6f6f6;
}
.faq-nav .nav-link.active {
background-color: #f6f6f6;
font-weight: 700;
color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87);
}
.faq-nav .nav-link:last-of-type {
border-bottom-left-radius: 2px;
border-bottom-right-radius: 2px;
border-bottom: 0;
}
.faq-nav .nav-link i.mdi {
margin-right: 5px;
font-size: 18px;
position: relative;
}
.tab-content {
box-shadow: 0 1px 5px rgba(85, 85, 85, 0.15);
}
.tab-content .card {
border-radius: 0;
}
.tab-content .card-header {
padding: 15px 16px;
border-radius: 0;
background-color: #f6f6f6;
}
.tab-content .card-header h5 {
margin: 0;
}
.tab-content .card-header h5 button {
display: block;
width: 100%;
padding: 0;
border: 0;
font-weight: 700;
color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87);
text-align: left;
white-space: normal;
}
.tab-content .card-header h5 button:hover, .tab-content .card-header h5 button:focus, .tab-content .card-header h5 button:active, .tab-content .card-header h5 button:hover:active {
text-decoration: none;
}
.tab-content .card-body p {
color: #616161;
}
.tab-content .card-body p:last-of-type {
margin: 0;
}
.accordion > .card:not(:first-child) {
border-top: 0;
}
.collapse.show .card-body {
border-bottom: 1px solid rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.125);
}
window.console = window.console || function(t) {};
Below is RSR's convenient Fact Checker for the many claims made by popular YouTuber "Professor" Dave in his five part series The Definitive Guide to Debunking Creationists. RSR has debunked this series with our own four part series The Debunking of Professor Dave. Dave Farina is not an actual professor, but instead a failed ex-teacher according to the Discovery Institute.
Creation scientists are quite aware of the Big Bang cosmology doctrine, they simply disagree with it due to the scores of evidence that contradict the Big Bang.
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/big-bang and rsr.org/big-bang-predictions
Fallacy: Misrepresentation, Strawman
No creation scientist has made this claim. Instead, they point out that retrograde planets contradict the Nebular Hypothesis, specifically due to the Conservation of Angular Momentum.
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/big-bang and rsr.org/big-bang-predictions
Fallacy: Strawman
This is of course a childish claim by Farina, and ironic given that it’s creationists who have been thrilled (but not surprised) with the findings of the Hubble and now James Webb space telescopes. For example, there are massive fully formed galaxies where they aren’t supposed to be (Webb Spots Super Old, Massive Galaxies That Shouldn’t Exist). RSR has documented many more failed predictions of the Big Bang.
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/big-bang-predictions
Fallacy: False caricature
Pretty much all the fine tuning arguments used by creationists come from secular scientists. For example, see Rare Earth by Ward and Brownlee.
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/fine-tuning
This was not a prediction, but instead a retrodiction. A paper in Nature magazine describes the particulars of this "prediction" as, "assumed ad hoc to obtain the required [predicted] abundances". In Physics Essays, "The study of historical data shows that over the years predictions of the ratio of helium to hydrogen in a BB universe have been repeatedly adjusted to agree with the latest available estimates of that ratio as observed in the real universe."
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/big-bang-predictions
Fallacy: Cherry-picking
Claims of observed Pop 3 stars is speculation. Daniel Whalen, an astrophysicist at the University of Portsmouth, said “it’s not clean evidence” because” Other piping hot cosmic objects can produce a similar helium II signature”.
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/list-of-star-formation-problems
Fallacy: Speculative evidence
Creationists have several competing theories to explain distant starlight. RSR leans toward either stretch cosmology or the plasma cosmology explanation. Note however that evolutionists also have a distant starlight problem called the "horizon problem" that forced evolutionists to posit the untenable and largely falsified inflation theory.
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/starlight-and-time, rsr.org/plasma
Fallacy: Inconsistency
Professor Dave mentions zircons, but doesn’t want to tell his listeners of a huge, gigantic elephant in the room which is the fact that those zircons have helium in them. Helium is slippery and should have escaped zircons long ago. Dr Russ Humphries set up an experiment with an independent lab that confirmed their slip rate through the material, and found that the zircons were roughly 6000 years old. This is one of many indicators that point to an earth much younger than "4.54 billion years plus or minus 50 million years".
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/list-of-not-so-old-things
Fallacy: Inconsistency
RSR champions Dr. Walt Brown's compelling and evidence-based theory on the origin of radioactivity (link below). Moreover, even evolutionists know that decay rates may have been different in the past: "There has been in recent years the horrible realization that radio decay rates are not as constant as previously thought, nor are they immune to environmental influences. And this could mean that the atomic clocks are reset during some global disaster, and events which brought the Mesozoic to a close may not be 65 million years ago but, rather, within the age and memory of man." – Evolutionist Frederic B. Jueneman, FAIC, Industrial Research & Development, p.21, June 1982
RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/origin-of-earths-radioactivity
Fallacy: Unwarranted assumption
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: Coming Soon
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
Coming Soon
Fallacy: TBD
TELETHON MONTH: We've got an exciting new announcement! With October being our telethon month, we're looking for 50 new sign ups for Bob Enyart Subscriptions. These are the best of the best available only at ENYART.SHOP! Please do whatever you can to help us reach our telethon goal of 50 new sign ups to keep the ministry alive and well!
Denver Bible Church pastor Bob Enyart defends Colorado's abolitionist personhood Amendment 48 vs. Planned Parenthood associate Crystal Clinkenbeard. For more, please see kgov.com/abortion.
TELETHON MONTH: We've got an exciting new announcement! With October being our telethon month, we're looking for 50 new sign ups for Bob Enyart Subscriptions. These are the best of the best available only at ENYART.SHOP! Please do whatever you can to help us reach our telethon goal of 50 new sign ups to keep the ministry alive and well!
Denver Bible Church pastor Bob Enyart defends Colorado's abolitionist personhood Amendment 48 vs. Planned Parenthood associate Crystal Clinkenbeard. For more, please see kgov.com/abortion.
TELETHON MONTH: We've got an exciting new announcement! With October being our telethon month, we're looking for 50 new sign ups for Bob Enyart Subscriptions. These are the best of the best available only at ENYART.SHOP! Please do whatever you can to help us reach our telethon goal of 50 new sign ups to keep the ministry alive and well!
* Revelation: The Book of Revelation vents God's final warning toward those who will not follow Him. Often clouded in mystery, this book has eluded the understanding of millions, and has been used as a pretext for many false prophets. Bob Enyart presents this conclusion of Scripture in light of the Bible's overview. This clear method of study helps to cut through much of the confusion regarding Revelation.
For over a quarter century Bob Enyart has studied God's Word praying for the wisdom to share the truth of Scripture with a lost and dying world. Now you can benefit from this very exciting Bible study. The two Revelation albums address matters of eternal consequence head on. Before listening to these tapes, Bob strongly urges that you read The Plot book or listen to The Plot album that will introduce you to the overview of the Bible. Available on MP3-CD or download.
BEL SUBSCRIPTIONS: Please consider one of our monthly subscriptions that will not only help support BEL, but they also promote better understanding of the Bible and may equip you to more effectively reach those around you.
Monthly Audio & Video Downloads: Now you can subscribe to monthly sermons, Bible studies or topical videos in download form.
Monthly Sermons: Enjoy all of Bob's sermons from the month on Sermon Video DVD, great also to watch with the family. Or, get these on Sermon Audio CDs which are standard audio Compact Discs that will play on any CD player including the one in your car. Or get them on a single Sermon MP3-CD which will play on an MP3 player, in a DVD player, or in your computer.
Monthly Bible Studies: Enjoy the Scriptures with Bob's Monthly Bible Study DVDs, great too for a small group Bible study. Or get these teachings on a single Monthly Bible Study Audio MP3- CD which will play on an MP3 player, in a DVD player, or in your computer.
Monthly Topical Videos: Coming to your mailbox, you'll get a Monthly Topical DVD to enjoy one of Bob's great videos specially selected to be entertaining and to teach about life from a biblical worldview.
Monthly BEL TV Classics: Enjoy Bob Enyart's timeless, popular TV show delivered to your home on the Monthly BEL TV Classics DVDs with great audio and video clarity thanks to our state-of-the-art mastering from the studio-quality Sony beta tapes to DVD!
Monthly Donation: For folks who just want to make sure that Bob Enyart Live stays on the air, please consider making a pledge in the form of a Monthly Donation.
Greetings to the brightest audience in the country, and welcome to Theology Thursday. I'm Nicole McBurney. Every weekday, we bring you the news of the day, the culture, and science from a Christian worldview.
But today, join me and Pastor Bob Enyart as we explore the source of our Christian worldview, the Bible.
So there's time, there's now and then, in heaven. If there was no time in heaven, there could never be anything new ever in heaven, if there was no time. And believe me, when you get to heaven, there will be something new there.
Something quite unlike anything that had ever been there before, when any of us get there. So of course, heaven is constantly changing, just with the never-ending stream of souls who arrive there, who have put their faith in God.
Verse 10, okay, there's a song being sung to God, and God is told, and you have made us kings and priests to our God, and we shall reign on the earth. Kings and priests. This shows the Jewish character of the book.
The people of God in the Book of Revelation are the 12 tribes of Israel, and their covenant is the new covenant based on circumcision, the covenant of circumcision and the law. That's the group to whom this book is written, the people of God. We'll see that in a bit when 12,000 are sealed from each of the 12 tribes of Israel.
Way back in Exodus chapter 19, you shall be to me a kingdom of priests. And that's what we have here. Christ has made us kings and priests to our God.
As one of the 12 apostles wrote to the believing Jews of the dispersion, 1 Peter 2.9, he wrote, You are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a royal, a kingly priesthood. Now, why are there 24 thrones and 24 elders when the number 12 signifies Israel? Well, King David divided the priesthood into 24 divisions.
Not the entire priesthood, not all of the Levites, but of the Levites, Aaron was a Levite. Remember Moses' brother, Miriam's brother, Aaron. And Aaron was the high priest.
And he had four kids. Two of them were killed because they were evil right off the bat. And the other two ended up with many thousands of descendants.
And at the time of David, which was centuries later, about five centuries later, David divided the descendants of Aaron into 24 divisions. The 24 courses, the 24 divisions of the priesthood. And each one, he went into the descendants of Aaron, and he found a strong man, a father of 24 different families that Aaron's sons had split into.
And he made each one a leader of a certain group of the descendants of the high priest. And they were as a group then responsible for serving the Lord at the temple. And they would take turns.
They'd go for one week from the Sabbath to the Sabbath, and then the next group and the next group. When they went through all 24, they'd start over, and they'd do that each year. And the eighth group, the group that would go in the eighth week of the year was of the division of Abijah.
And Abijah, that is whom Zacharias and Elizabeth were descendants of. He was in the order of Abijah, and that's who John the Baptist was of that order. So David, he took the priest, specifically the high priest descendants, and divided them into 24 divisions.
And so it's possible that these 24 thrones with 24 elders, of course, Israel's 12, double that as 24, in heaven and on earth, it could be that they are emblematic symbols of the priestly kingdom of Israel. And in that way, in that respect, symbols of the whole group of redeemed Israel. Perhaps these are not always 24 particular individuals.
It could be that from time to time, those saved among Israel get to go to the throne room of God and sit on that throne and from Sabbath to Sabbath worship the Lord. We don't know. But if so, then that would work following the model of the priesthood that was implemented by David through the Old Testament.
And we shall reign on the earth. And that is what they are looking forward to. God promised Israel an earthly kingdom.
And Jesus Christ came in encouraging them that the meek shall inherit heaven. Is that what he said? No, he said the meek shall inherit the earth.
Christians, rightly today, have a focus that we are citizens of heaven and we plan to live forever in heaven. But God creates a new heaven and a new earth. And the new Jerusalem comes down out of heaven onto the new earth and becomes the center, the capital, if you will, of the kingdom on earth, of God's kingdom on earth.
And that's for Israel. And that's where the twelve tribes will live. And that's where the twelve gates to the new Jerusalem, the city, and the names of the twelve apostles, and the twelve thrones that Jesus spoke of, that the twelve apostles will sit on those thrones, judging the tribes of Israel.
So that is all going to happen. And that's what these elders are looking forward to, reigning on the earth, not in heaven. Which is another of so many indications that this is a Jewish book for believing Israel in the circumcision, not for the body of Christ.
Verse 11, Then I looked, and I heard the voice of many angels around the throne, the living creatures and the elders, and the number of them was ten thousand times ten thousand and thousands of thousands. There are many angels up in heaven that are willing to worship God and serve him and at his command could fly down to the earth. And one angel back in the Old Testament destroyed the Assyrian army.
How many soldiers did he kill in one night? I think it was a hundred and eighty five thousand Assyrians. You know, it's interesting looking in the history of the world.
I didn't put this in my notes. I'm trying to recall who wrote this brief history of the world. It's in two massive volumes that I have at the office.
Maybe I'll recall who wrote it, but he's not a believer. He's not a Christian. He doesn't like the Bible, but he mentions in there when you go back and read about the Assyrian empire, he says, and the Syrian army at one point, at the right point in the Bible's history, was on its way to Egypt in a plague destroyed the Assyrian army.
And I think that was pretty coincidental. HG. Wells.
Thank you very much. That's right. So God has a lot of angels, and those angels represent a tremendous amount of power.
How many angels are there? And if a third of the angels fell, how many angels would that mean? How many demons are there?
Well, we don't know how many angels there are. If this estimation here is anywhere near literal, within any kind of ballpark, that would mean there were 153 million angels originally created. Now, I don't think this is really a literal statement.
I think it's a figure of speech, but it might put us in a ballpark. There might be many more, but 10,000 times 10,000 would be 100 million, and thousands of thousands would be at least a couple million. So that would be 102 million, and if there were originally a third that fell, that would be 153 million, with 51 million demons.
Now we have no idea, of course, if that's the case. Maybe there's twice as many fallen angels, 100 million, or three times as many, 150 million, or four times, or five times, maybe a quarter of a billion. You know, if there were a quarter of a billion fallen angels, that would be one for every 24 people in the world.
So you couldn't have your own demon, but you might have your block demon, who would try to tempt everyone on the block, depending on who's home at any given moment. But it's interesting, if the number is closer to 50 million, then we'd have one demon for every 120 people in the world today. But of those, say whatever the number is, 50 million demons, many of them have been locked up in Tartarus, some undoubtedly for going after strange flesh when they produced the Nephilim, the giants of old, by going into the daughters of men.
Remember when Jesus in Matthew chapter 8 confronted these demons and they cried out and said, What have we to do with you, Jesus, you son of God? Have you come here to torment us before the time? And they didn't want anything to do with Jesus.
And they didn't want to be like their fellow demons who had been locked in chains and bound up. They wanted to stay free and clear. So of the original number, how many were locked up?
We don't know. We are speaking of the same angels that jude wrote of in verse 6 of his book, the angels who did not keep their proper domain but left their own abode, that God has reserved in everlasting chains under darkness for the judgment of the great day. In Noah's day, there could have been a billion people on the earth, and it seems that the problem of angels going after women was widespread, being a major reason why God destroyed all of mankind.
So if half of the demons were locked up, we may not have as many demons as Christians generally think. And the only reason I've spent this few minutes on this topic is because there are some groups of Christians that are almost obsessed with demonology and demons and deliverance from demons. And whenever there's a problem, well, you have to get delivered from a demon.
If you have a problem with eating or with finances or with pornography, it's a demon. And they will go through an exorcism of sorts and you're delivered and you no longer have that problem. That's wonderful, except that it doesn't work.
And nowhere in the Bible does it say, well, if you're struggling with some lust of the flesh, get a demon kicked out of you and then you'll be okay. It just doesn't say that. And in the whole Bible, if we looked at the passages that refer to demons, it's just the tiny sliver of the whole book.
A very minimal focus. Now, our battle is in the spiritual realm. And that's true if any one particular person is up against Satan himself or any of his hierarchy or even some of his flunky demons.
If you find yourself in a battle with a demon and there's a demon putting thoughts in your mind and tempting you and you have this real concrete temptation and you're getting these thoughts obsessively to give into it, you might be in a battle with a demon. On the other hand, you might just be in a battle with your heart and your flesh, which is deceitful above all else. And you might be in a battle with your boss or your friend or your relative.
The point is, whoever you're in the battle with, it's a spiritual battle and it's fought in the spiritual realm because our Christian life is a spiritual entity. We live our lives in our heart, in our mind. That's where the battles are all fought.
So let's go on to verse 12. These angels were saying with a loud voice, worthy is the lamb who was slain, to receive power and riches and wisdom and strength and honor and glory and blessing. How could God possibly receive power?
I think we talked about this when we were in chapter four. How could God receive power or honor or strength? Isn't he the source of all power and all strength and all honor?
Yes, but he has delegated power and authority to us, to all the angelic realm. So if an angel honors God, if the four living creatures, all the hosts of the angels that worship God, when we worship God and we give him power, we're giving him power over our own wills. Because we couldn't give him something unless we had it.
And the determinist Christians, the Calvinists who think God is in control of every atom, every molecule, every thought, everything, then he could never receive power or authority because he has it all. And you can't receive it if you already have it. But if you've delegated power over wills so that we have a free will, and we give power and glory and honor to God, we're giving back to him the power he gave us over our wills because we submit our will to him.
We say, Lord, we want to obey you.
Verse 13, And every creature which is in heaven and on the earth and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, I heard saying, blessing and honor and glory and power be to him who sits on the throne and to the lamb forever and ever. And it's a strange reference to the creatures that are in the sea saying this. We've done a study when we were in the Book of Jonah, we went through quite a few verses in the Bible about the sea and the strange things that are said about the sea in the Bible and how it seems to be a place where demons get together.
It seems to be a place that receives the dead and the sea will give up the dead that is within it. So that down in the deep where hades is, somewhere down beneath the sea perhaps. And we know that in the new heaven and the new earth, when God creates the new earth, he says there will be no more sea.
So the sea is gone and surfing too. Forget that except for the internet. But hopefully that will be gone too.
So could it be that God's angels have freedom to travel through his created order and they could be on the planets, in the stars, on the earth, in the sea, on the land, in the air? I think so. And they don't have to breathe oxygen like we do.
And so wherever they are, as if on cue, they shout out their blessings to God.
And when we bless God, we honor him. God commands us to honor our parents because we should. And it teaches us to honor God.
When we honor our parents. So parents should be honorable. It's hard for kids to honor their parents when they're not honorable.
My kids, to the extent that they have suffered because of sin in my life, that makes me, in their eyes, less honorable. And they have suffered because of things I've done wrong to hurt our family and others. And so, in their life, if they come to a time when they decide to fully give themselves over to honor God as they grow and mature, if they do that, they've done that in part because I've taught and encouraged them to, and in part, in spite of what they've seen from me.
So because many of us in this room still have kids, and if not kids, grandkids, we have an opportunity to live honorably from this moment forward, and that our children and those around us would learn about God, not in spite of what we are doing, but because of what we are doing. Verse 14, Then the four living creatures said, Amen. And the twenty-four elders fell down and worshiped him who lives forever and ever.
And now we enter chapter six.
During this chapter, I'm going to take a diversion and look at the overview of the plagues and the torments that God will unleash on the world, just so we can get a bit of a view of what's coming, and try to figure out the order of the Book of Revelation. Is it all chronological? Is it all mixed up?
So we'll talk about that in the next few verses. Now I saw when the lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard one of the four living creatures saying with a voice like thunder, Come and see. And that word come in the Greek is ercomai.
We'll talk about that later. And I looked and behold a white horse. He who sat on it had a bow, and a crown was given to him.
And he went out conquering and to conquer. Now we begin to see God's wrath unfold from this point. This is where the first seal is opened.
The first seal is opened and a white horse as a result of this goes out to conquer. And from here to the end of the tripulation, we see the intensifying wrath and vengeance of God. Now let's consider briefly for a moment, an outline of the 21 judgments in the Book of Revelation.
There's 21 when you add up the seven seals, the seven trumpets, and the seven bowls. Now there's something, the four horsemen of the Apocalypse, but they are the first four seals. So there's really 21.
There are the seven thunders, but we won't mention them because John begins to write what they said and God said, don't write it down. So we won't even mention those guys. But the Apocalypse reveals these three consecutive series, each containing seven events.
Seals, trumpets, and bowls. Now many commentators on this book end up with a convoluted view of the book. And they say it's not in chronological order.
And you take whatever part you think comes next and you put it however you want to put it. And I think that's a mess. I think you take things in the Bible as chronological unless the Bible says it's not.
So in the scheme of his book, John presents these events, at least he intimates that he's doing that, in order. First you get the seals and you get the first scroll before the second, before the third, and so on before the seventh. Then the trumpets, then the bowls.
As we've seen in the first two verses of Revelation 6, Christ opens the first seal and in the next verse, verse three, he opens the second seal and so on through the first six. And then he gets to the seventh seal. And when he opens that, I'll read, I'll skip ahead just for the sake of the overview, Revelation 8.1, when he opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven for about half an hour.
And I saw the seven angels who stand before God and to them were given seven trumpets. And so the seven angels who had the seven trumpets prepared themselves to sound and the first angel sounded. That's all in Revelation chapter eight.
So the seventh seal is actually marking the first trumpet blast. So the seven seals lead right into the seven trumpets seamlessly. The seventh seal is the seventh trumpet blast.
As Christ is unraveling the scroll and opening the seals, and he opens the seventh seal, and it says, And there were seven trumpets. That was what was inside the seventh seal. It reminds me of when we went with Tim Gaylord, my friend, his kids, and my two boys, Josiah and Nathaniel, we went whitewater rafting on the Colorado River, and we were coming up to the seven steps, and they named the rapids.
And the rapids are pretty horrendous. They can be in the right time of the year. And you're in these huge boats with paddles, and you're semi-strapped in, in case of capsizes, you could get out.
And we go through this rapid, and the guide was flung from, she was on the opposite end of the raft that I was on, maybe 10 feet long, and she was flung through the air, and she hit into me and a guy next to me. That was pretty severe. One guy almost went over the raft, and we pulled him in.
She was on the other side, and it was finally to get to calm water, and we said, man, we're glad those, did I tell you what they were called? The seven steps. And I said, I'm glad we're through the seven steps, and she said, that was step one.
Like, oh no, where can we get out?
Well, that's what this was like. There were the seven seals, and the seven seal opens the seven trumpets. Therefore, all seven seals precede the trumpets.
It's chronological. And after the sixth trumpet sounds, after the sixth trumpet sounds, then we have, with the seventh trumpet, we're in the midpoint of the tribulation. We're in the middle of the week.
And we'll talk about that for a little bit right now. The middle of the week is four chapters, ten through thirteen. And in those chapters, how do we know they're the middle of the week?
Well, Daniel and Jesus, they both said things that look forward to the middle of the week of the tribulation, the middle of the seven years. But those chapters repeatedly warn about what's to come. And they basically say, brace yourself, because the next forty-two months are going to be tough.
And the upcoming three-and-a-half years, or the one thousand two hundred and sixty days that are coming, are going to be really bad. So in those four chapters, we read of warnings like that repeatedly. So we could tell we're in the middle of the week.
Recall that Daniel, in chapter 9, verse 27, specifically called attention to the middle of the week, period when the Antichrist would do something just abominable. And Jesus, too, referenced this midweek period in Matthew 24 and indicated it as the time that Israel would flee to the mountains. So that fleeing to the mountains that Jesus referred to is not coincidentally the same time that Revelation indicates Israel will flee into the wilderness in Revelation 12, verse 6.
It all comes together as a reasonably cohesive story of the outline of the last seven years of man's rebellion against God just before Christ returns. So the Bible, especially in Revelation, emphasizes this middle of the week as a terrible time of great consequence. These middle of the week chapters, these four, 10, 11, 12, and 13, they might be where some commentators get confused and think the whole book is not in chronological order because the stories in that middle section have one place there's a bit of a flashback, another place there's a flash forward, but it's a natural way of telling a story.
For example, in Revelation chapter 11, it's in the middle of the week that we find out that there are two prophets. God sends down two prophets to judge and condemn the earth for 42 months. They're here for 42 months and they have the power to kill those who attack them.
But it says, but at the end of their ministry, they are killed and they lie in the streets of Jerusalem for three days, their bodies unburied, and then they are resurrected. So there you are, oh no, oh my, what are we to do?
We're at the end of the Tribulation.
But big deal. It's just a little flash forward. It's the normal way historians always write.
You're telling the history of the world and you introduce a minor character, and you, in a paragraph, say, what's going to happen to him in the rest of his life, and where he's going to die? And then the very next story, you're back at the same year, the same moment in time, you introduce that person. So it doesn't mean that the Book of Revelation is not in chronological order.
And as an example of a flashback, we find the woman in Revelation 12 who is Israel. We can tell she's Israel because of comparison with Jacob and his 12 sons back in Genesis chapter 37. And there, there's depicted this brief flashback when the nation gives birth to the Messiah.
And so that's a little bit of a flashback. And then a flash forward to the middle of the Tribulation where Satan is going to attack that woman Israel, but she will flee into the wilderness and be protected by God. And that's about it.
Other than that, the Book of Revelation is chronological. And there's no reason to take all the judgments and rearrange them.Greetings to the brightest audience in the country, and welcome to Theology Thursday. I'm Nicole McBurney. Every weekday, we bring you the news of the day, the culture, and science from a Christian worldview.
But today, join me and Pastor Bob Enyart as we explore the source of our Christian worldview, the Bible.
So there's time, there's now and then, in heaven. If there was no time in heaven, there could never be anything new ever in heaven, if there was no time. And believe me, when you get to heaven, there will be something new there.
Something quite unlike anything that had ever been there before, when any of us get there. So of course, heaven is constantly changing, just with the never-ending stream of souls who arrive there, who have put their faith in God.
Verse 10, okay, there's a song being sung to God, and God is told, and you have made us kings and priests to our God, and we shall reign on the earth. Kings and priests. This shows the Jewish character of the book.
The people of God in the Book of Revelation are the 12 tribes of Israel, and their covenant is the new covenant based on circumcision, the covenant of circumcision and the law. That's the group to whom this book is written, the people of God. We'll see that in a bit when 12,000 are sealed from each of the 12 tribes of Israel.
Way back in Exodus chapter 19, you shall be to me a kingdom of priests. And that's what we have here. Christ has made us kings and priests to our God.
As one of the 12 apostles wrote to the believing Jews of the dispersion, 1 Peter 2.9, he wrote, You are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a royal, a kingly priesthood. Now, why are there 24 thrones and 24 elders when the number 12 signifies Israel? Well, King David divided the priesthood into 24 divisions.
Not the entire priesthood, not all of the Levites, but of the Levites, Aaron was a Levite. Remember Moses' brother, Miriam's brother, Aaron. And Aaron was the high priest.
And he had four kids. Two of them were killed because they were evil right off the bat. And the other two ended up with many thousands of descendants.
And at the time of David, which was centuries later, about five centuries later, David divided the descendants of Aaron into 24 divisions. The 24 courses, the 24 divisions of the priesthood. And each one, he went into the descendants of Aaron, and he found a strong man, a father of 24 different families that Aaron's sons had split into.
And he made each one a leader of a certain group of the descendants of the high priest. And they were as a group then responsible for serving the Lord at the temple. And they would take turns.
They'd go for one week from the Sabbath to the Sabbath, and then the next group and the next group. When they went through all 24, they'd start over, and they'd do that each year. And the eighth group, the group that would go in the eighth week of the year was of the division of Abijah.
And Abijah, that is whom Zacharias and Elizabeth were descendants of. He was in the order of Abijah, and that's who John the Baptist was of that order. So David, he took the priest, specifically the high priest descendants, and divided them into 24 divisions.
And so it's possible that these 24 thrones with 24 elders, of course, Israel's 12, double that as 24, in heaven and on earth, it could be that they are emblematic symbols of the priestly kingdom of Israel. And in that way, in that respect, symbols of the whole group of redeemed Israel. Perhaps these are not always 24 particular individuals.
It could be that from time to time, those saved among Israel get to go to the throne room of God and sit on that throne and from Sabbath to Sabbath worship the Lord. We don't know. But if so, then that would work following the model of the priesthood that was implemented by David through the Old Testament.
And we shall reign on the earth. And that is what they are looking forward to. God promised Israel an earthly kingdom.
And Jesus Christ came in encouraging them that the meek shall inherit heaven. Is that what he said? No, he said the meek shall inherit the earth.
Christians, rightly today, have a focus that we are citizens of heaven and we plan to live forever in heaven. But God creates a new heaven and a new earth. And the new Jerusalem comes down out of heaven onto the new earth and becomes the center, the capital, if you will, of the kingdom on earth, of God's kingdom on earth.
And that's for Israel. And that's where the twelve tribes will live. And that's where the twelve gates to the new Jerusalem, the city, and the names of the twelve apostles, and the twelve thrones that Jesus spoke of, that the twelve apostles will sit on those thrones, judging the tribes of Israel.
So that is all going to happen. And that's what these elders are looking forward to, reigning on the earth, not in heaven. Which is another of so many indications that this is a Jewish book for believing Israel in the circumcision, not for the body of Christ.
Verse 11, Then I looked, and I heard the voice of many angels around the throne, the living creatures and the elders, and the number of them was ten thousand times ten thousand and thousands of thousands. There are many angels up in heaven that are willing to worship God and serve him and at his command could fly down to the earth. And one angel back in the Old Testament destroyed the Assyrian army.
How many soldiers did he kill in one night? I think it was a hundred and eighty five thousand Assyrians. You know, it's interesting looking in the history of the world.
I didn't put this in my notes. I'm trying to recall who wrote this brief history of the world. It's in two massive volumes that I have at the office.
Maybe I'll recall who wrote it, but he's not a believer. He's not a Christian. He doesn't like the Bible, but he mentions in there when you go back and read about the Assyrian empire, he says, and the Syrian army at one point, at the right point in the Bible's history, was on its way to Egypt in a plague destroyed the Assyrian army.
And I think that was pretty coincidental. HG. Wells.
Thank you very much. That's right. So God has a lot of angels, and those angels represent a tremendous amount of power.
How many angels are there? And if a third of the angels fell, how many angels would that mean? How many demons are there?
Well, we don't know how many angels there are. If this estimation here is anywhere near literal, within any kind of ballpark, that would mean there were 153 million angels originally created. Now, I don't think this is really a literal statement.
I think it's a figure of speech, but it might put us in a ballpark. There might be many more, but 10,000 times 10,000 would be 100 million, and thousands of thousands would be at least a couple million. So that would be 102 million, and if there were originally a third that fell, that would be 153 million, with 51 million demons.
Now we have no idea, of course, if that's the case. Maybe there's twice as many fallen angels, 100 million, or three times as many, 150 million, or four times, or five times, maybe a quarter of a billion. You know, if there were a quarter of a billion fallen angels, that would be one for every 24 people in the world.
So you couldn't have your own demon, but you might have your block demon, who would try to tempt everyone on the block, depending on who's home at any given moment. But it's interesting, if the number is closer to 50 million, then we'd have one demon for every 120 people in the world today. But of those, say whatever the number is, 50 million demons, many of them have been locked up in Tartarus, some undoubtedly for going after strange flesh when they produced the Nephilim, the giants of old, by going into the daughters of men.
Remember when Jesus in Matthew chapter 8 confronted these demons and they cried out and said, What have we to do with you, Jesus, you son of God? Have you come here to torment us before the time? And they didn't want anything to do with Jesus.
And they didn't want to be like their fellow demons who had been locked in chains and bound up. They wanted to stay free and clear. So of the original number, how many were locked up?
We don't know. We are speaking of the same angels that jude wrote of in verse 6 of his book, the angels who did not keep their proper domain but left their own abode, that God has reserved in everlasting chains under darkness for the judgment of the great day. In Noah's day, there could have been a billion people on the earth, and it seems that the problem of angels going after women was widespread, being a major reason why God destroyed all of mankind.
So if half of the demons were locked up, we may not have as many demons as Christians generally think. And the only reason I've spent this few minutes on this topic is because there are some groups of Christians that are almost obsessed with demonology and demons and deliverance from demons. And whenever there's a problem, well, you have to get delivered from a demon.
If you have a problem with eating or with finances or with pornography, it's a demon. And they will go through an exorcism of sorts and you're delivered and you no longer have that problem. That's wonderful, except that it doesn't work.
And nowhere in the Bible does it say, well, if you're struggling with some lust of the flesh, get a demon kicked out of you and then you'll be okay. It just doesn't say that. And in the whole Bible, if we looked at the passages that refer to demons, it's just the tiny sliver of the whole book.
A very minimal focus. Now, our battle is in the spiritual realm. And that's true if any one particular person is up against Satan himself or any of his hierarchy or even some of his flunky demons.
If you find yourself in a battle with a demon and there's a demon putting thoughts in your mind and tempting you and you have this real concrete temptation and you're getting these thoughts obsessively to give into it, you might be in a battle with a demon. On the other hand, you might just be in a battle with your heart and your flesh, which is deceitful above all else. And you might be in a battle with your boss or your friend or your relative.
The point is, whoever you're in the battle with, it's a spiritual battle and it's fought in the spiritual realm because our Christian life is a spiritual entity. We live our lives in our heart, in our mind. That's where the battles are all fought.
So let's go on to verse 12. These angels were saying with a loud voice, worthy is the lamb who was slain, to receive power and riches and wisdom and strength and honor and glory and blessing. How could God possibly receive power?
I think we talked about this when we were in chapter four. How could God receive power or honor or strength? Isn't he the source of all power and all strength and all honor?
Yes, but he has delegated power and authority to us, to all the angelic realm. So if an angel honors God, if the four living creatures, all the hosts of the angels that worship God, when we worship God and we give him power, we're giving him power over our own wills. Because we couldn't give him something unless we had it.
And the determinist Christians, the Calvinists who think God is in control of every atom, every molecule, every thought, everything, then he could never receive power or authority because he has it all. And you can't receive it if you already have it. But if you've delegated power over wills so that we have a free will, and we give power and glory and honor to God, we're giving back to him the power he gave us over our wills because we submit our will to him.
We say, Lord, we want to obey you.
Verse 13, And every creature which is in heaven and on the earth and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, I heard saying, blessing and honor and glory and power be to him who sits on the throne and to the lamb forever and ever. And it's a strange reference to the creatures that are in the sea saying this. We've done a study when we were in the Book of Jonah, we went through quite a few verses in the Bible about the sea and the strange things that are said about the sea in the Bible and how it seems to be a place where demons get together.
It seems to be a place that receives the dead and the sea will give up the dead that is within it. So that down in the deep where hades is, somewhere down beneath the sea perhaps. And we know that in the new heaven and the new earth, when God creates the new earth, he says there will be no more sea.
So the sea is gone and surfing too. Forget that except for the internet. But hopefully that will be gone too.
So could it be that God's angels have freedom to travel through his created order and they could be on the planets, in the stars, on the earth, in the sea, on the land, in the air? I think so. And they don't have to breathe oxygen like we do.
And so wherever they are, as if on cue, they shout out their blessings to God.
And when we bless God, we honor him. God commands us to honor our parents because we should. And it teaches us to honor God.
When we honor our parents. So parents should be honorable. It's hard for kids to honor their parents when they're not honorable.
My kids, to the extent that they have suffered because of sin in my life, that makes me, in their eyes, less honorable. And they have suffered because of things I've done wrong to hurt our family and others. And so, in their life, if they come to a time when they decide to fully give themselves over to honor God as they grow and mature, if they do that, they've done that in part because I've taught and encouraged them to, and in part, in spite of what they've seen from me.
So because many of us in this room still have kids, and if not kids, grandkids, we have an opportunity to live honorably from this moment forward, and that our children and those around us would learn about God, not in spite of what we are doing, but because of what we are doing. Verse 14, Then the four living creatures said, Amen. And the twenty-four elders fell down and worshiped him who lives forever and ever.
And now we enter chapter six.
During this chapter, I'm going to take a diversion and look at the overview of the plagues and the torments that God will unleash on the world, just so we can get a bit of a view of what's coming, and try to figure out the order of the Book of Revelation. Is it all chronological? Is it all mixed up?
So we'll talk about that in the next few verses. Now I saw when the lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard one of the four living creatures saying with a voice like thunder, Come and see. And that word come in the Greek is ercomai.
We'll talk about that later. And I looked and behold a white horse. He who sat on it had a bow, and a crown was given to him.
And he went out conquering and to conquer. Now we begin to see God's wrath unfold from this point. This is where the first seal is opened.
The first seal is opened and a white horse as a result of this goes out to conquer. And from here to the end of the tripulation, we see the intensifying wrath and vengeance of God. Now let's consider briefly for a moment, an outline of the 21 judgments in the Book of Revelation.
There's 21 when you add up the seven seals, the seven trumpets, and the seven bowls. Now there's something, the four horsemen of the Apocalypse, but they are the first four seals. So there's really 21.
There are the seven thunders, but we won't mention them because John begins to write what they said and God said, don't write it down. So we won't even mention those guys. But the Apocalypse reveals these three consecutive series, each containing seven events.
Seals, trumpets, and bowls. Now many commentators on this book end up with a convoluted view of the book. And they say it's not in chronological order.
And you take whatever part you think comes next and you put it however you want to put it. And I think that's a mess. I think you take things in the Bible as chronological unless the Bible says it's not.
So in the scheme of his book, John presents these events, at least he intimates that he's doing that, in order. First you get the seals and you get the first scroll before the second, before the third, and so on before the seventh. Then the trumpets, then the bowls.
As we've seen in the first two verses of Revelation 6, Christ opens the first seal and in the next verse, verse three, he opens the second seal and so on through the first six. And then he gets to the seventh seal. And when he opens that, I'll read, I'll skip ahead just for the sake of the overview, Revelation 8.1, when he opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven for about half an hour.
And I saw the seven angels who stand before God and to them were given seven trumpets. And so the seven angels who had the seven trumpets prepared themselves to sound and the first angel sounded. That's all in Revelation chapter eight.
So the seventh seal is actually marking the first trumpet blast. So the seven seals lead right into the seven trumpets seamlessly. The seventh seal is the seventh trumpet blast.
As Christ is unraveling the scroll and opening the seals, and he opens the seventh seal, and it says, And there were seven trumpets. That was what was inside the seventh seal. It reminds me of when we went with Tim Gaylord, my friend, his kids, and my two boys, Josiah and Nathaniel, we went whitewater rafting on the Colorado River, and we were coming up to the seven steps, and they named the rapids.
And the rapids are pretty horrendous. They can be in the right time of the year. And you're in these huge boats with paddles, and you're semi-strapped in, in case of capsizes, you could get out.
And we go through this rapid, and the guide was flung from, she was on the opposite end of the raft that I was on, maybe 10 feet long, and she was flung through the air, and she hit into me and a guy next to me. That was pretty severe. One guy almost went over the raft, and we pulled him in.
She was on the other side, and it was finally to get to calm water, and we said, man, we're glad those, did I tell you what they were called? The seven steps. And I said, I'm glad we're through the seven steps, and she said, that was step one.
Like, oh no, where can we get out?
Well, that's what this was like. There were the seven seals, and the seven seal opens the seven trumpets. Therefore, all seven seals precede the trumpets.
It's chronological. And after the sixth trumpet sounds, after the sixth trumpet sounds, then we have, with the seventh trumpet, we're in the midpoint of the tribulation. We're in the middle of the week.
And we'll talk about that for a little bit right now. The middle of the week is four chapters, ten through thirteen. And in those chapters, how do we know they're the middle of the week?
Well, Daniel and Jesus, they both said things that look forward to the middle of the week of the tribulation, the middle of the seven years. But those chapters repeatedly warn about what's to come. And they basically say, brace yourself, because the next forty-two months are going to be tough.
And the upcoming three-and-a-half years, or the one thousand two hundred and sixty days that are coming, are going to be really bad. So in those four chapters, we read of warnings like that repeatedly. So we could tell we're in the middle of the week.
Recall that Daniel, in chapter 9, verse 27, specifically called attention to the middle of the week, period when the Antichrist would do something just abominable. And Jesus, too, referenced this midweek period in Matthew 24 and indicated it as the time that Israel would flee to the mountains. So that fleeing to the mountains that Jesus referred to is not coincidentally the same time that Revelation indicates Israel will flee into the wilderness in Revelation 12, verse 6.
It all comes together as a reasonably cohesive story of the outline of the last seven years of man's rebellion against God just before Christ returns. So the Bible, especially in Revelation, emphasizes this middle of the week as a terrible time of great consequence. These middle of the week chapters, these four, 10, 11, 12, and 13, they might be where some commentators get confused and think the whole book is not in chronological order because the stories in that middle section have one place there's a bit of a flashback, another place there's a flash forward, but it's a natural way of telling a story.
For example, in Revelation chapter 11, it's in the middle of the week that we find out that there are two prophets. God sends down two prophets to judge and condemn the earth for 42 months. They're here for 42 months and they have the power to kill those who attack them.
But it says, but at the end of their ministry, they are killed and they lie in the streets of Jerusalem for three days, their bodies unburied, and then they are resurrected. So there you are, oh no, oh my, what are we to do?
We're at the end of the Tribulation.
But big deal. It's just a little flash forward. It's the normal way historians always write.
You're telling the history of the world and you introduce a minor character, and you, in a paragraph, say, what's going to happen to him in the rest of his life, and where he's going to die? And then the very next story, you're back at the same year, the same moment in time, you introduce that person. So it doesn't mean that the Book of Revelation is not in chronological order.
And as an example of a flashback, we find the woman in Revelation 12 who is Israel. We can tell she's Israel because of comparison with Jacob and his 12 sons back in Genesis chapter 37. And there, there's depicted this brief flashback when the nation gives birth to the Messiah.
And so that's a little bit of a flashback. And then a flash forward to the middle of the Tribulation where Satan is going to attack that woman Israel, but she will flee into the wilderness and be protected by God. And that's about it.
Other than that, the Book of Revelation is chronological. And there's no reason to take all the judgments and rearrange them.Greetings to the brightest audience in the country, and welcome to Theology Thursday. I'm Nicole McBurney. Every weekday, we bring you the news of the day, the culture, and science from a Christian worldview.
But today, join me and Pastor Bob Enyart as we explore the source of our Christian worldview, the Bible.
So there's time, there's now and then, in heaven. If there was no time in heaven, there could never be anything new ever in heaven, if there was no time. And believe me, when you get to heaven, there will be something new there.
Something quite unlike anything that had ever been there before, when any of us get there. So of course, heaven is constantly changing, just with the never-ending stream of souls who arrive there, who have put their faith in God.
Verse 10, okay, there's a song being sung to God, and God is told, and you have made us kings and priests to our God, and we shall reign on the earth. Kings and priests. This shows the Jewish character of the book.
The people of God in the Book of Revelation are the 12 tribes of Israel, and their covenant is the new covenant based on circumcision, the covenant of circumcision and the law. That's the group to whom this book is written, the people of God. We'll see that in a bit when 12,000 are sealed from each of the 12 tribes of Israel.
Way back in Exodus chapter 19, you shall be to me a kingdom of priests. And that's what we have here. Christ has made us kings and priests to our God.
As one of the 12 apostles wrote to the believing Jews of the dispersion, 1 Peter 2.9, he wrote, You are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a royal, a kingly priesthood. Now, why are there 24 thrones and 24 elders when the number 12 signifies Israel? Well, King David divided the priesthood into 24 divisions.
Not the entire priesthood, not all of the Levites, but of the Levites, Aaron was a Levite. Remember Moses' brother, Miriam's brother, Aaron. And Aaron was the high priest.
And he had four kids. Two of them were killed because they were evil right off the bat. And the other two ended up with many thousands of descendants.
And at the time of David, which was centuries later, about five centuries later, David divided the descendants of Aaron into 24 divisions. The 24 courses, the 24 divisions of the priesthood. And each one, he went into the descendants of Aaron, and he found a strong man, a father of 24 different families that Aaron's sons had split into.
And he made each one a leader of a certain group of the descendants of the high priest. And they were as a group then responsible for serving the Lord at the temple. And they would take turns.
They'd go for one week from the Sabbath to the Sabbath, and then the next group and the next group. When they went through all 24, they'd start over, and they'd do that each year. And the eighth group, the group that would go in the eighth week of the year was of the division of Abijah.
And Abijah, that is whom Zacharias and Elizabeth were descendants of. He was in the order of Abijah, and that's who John the Baptist was of that order. So David, he took the priest, specifically the high priest descendants, and divided them into 24 divisions.
And so it's possible that these 24 thrones with 24 elders, of course, Israel's 12, double that as 24, in heaven and on earth, it could be that they are emblematic symbols of the priestly kingdom of Israel. And in that way, in that respect, symbols of the whole group of redeemed Israel. Perhaps these are not always 24 particular individuals.
It could be that from time to time, those saved among Israel get to go to the throne room of God and sit on that throne and from Sabbath to Sabbath worship the Lord. We don't know. But if so, then that would work following the model of the priesthood that was implemented by David through the Old Testament.
And we shall reign on the earth. And that is what they are looking forward to. God promised Israel an earthly kingdom.
And Jesus Christ came in encouraging them that the meek shall inherit heaven. Is that what he said? No, he said the meek shall inherit the earth.
Christians, rightly today, have a focus that we are citizens of heaven and we plan to live forever in heaven. But God creates a new heaven and a new earth. And the new Jerusalem comes down out of heaven onto the new earth and becomes the center, the capital, if you will, of the kingdom on earth, of God's kingdom on earth.
And that's for Israel. And that's where the twelve tribes will live. And that's where the twelve gates to the new Jerusalem, the city, and the names of the twelve apostles, and the twelve thrones that Jesus spoke of, that the twelve apostles will sit on those thrones, judging the tribes of Israel.
So that is all going to happen. And that's what these elders are looking forward to, reigning on the earth, not in heaven. Which is another of so many indications that this is a Jewish book for believing Israel in the circumcision, not for the body of Christ.
Verse 11, Then I looked, and I heard the voice of many angels around the throne, the living creatures and the elders, and the number of them was ten thousand times ten thousand and thousands of thousands. There are many angels up in heaven that are willing to worship God and serve him and at his command could fly down to the earth. And one angel back in the Old Testament destroyed the Assyrian army.
How many soldiers did he kill in one night? I think it was a hundred and eighty five thousand Assyrians. You know, it's interesting looking in the history of the world.
I didn't put this in my notes. I'm trying to recall who wrote this brief history of the world. It's in two massive volumes that I have at the office.
Maybe I'll recall who wrote it, but he's not a believer. He's not a Christian. He doesn't like the Bible, but he mentions in there when you go back and read about the Assyrian empire, he says, and the Syrian army at one point, at the right point in the Bible's history, was on its way to Egypt in a plague destroyed the Assyrian army.
And I think that was pretty coincidental. HG. Wells.
Thank you very much. That's right. So God has a lot of angels, and those angels represent a tremendous amount of power.
How many angels are there? And if a third of the angels fell, how many angels would that mean? How many demons are there?
Well, we don't know how many angels there are. If this estimation here is anywhere near literal, within any kind of ballpark, that would mean there were 153 million angels originally created. Now, I don't think this is really a literal statement.
I think it's a figure of speech, but it might put us in a ballpark. There might be many more, but 10,000 times 10,000 would be 100 million, and thousands of thousands would be at least a couple million. So that would be 102 million, and if there were originally a third that fell, that would be 153 million, with 51 million demons.
Now we have no idea, of course, if that's the case. Maybe there's twice as many fallen angels, 100 million, or three times as many, 150 million, or four times, or five times, maybe a quarter of a billion. You know, if there were a quarter of a billion fallen angels, that would be one for every 24 people in the world.
So you couldn't have your own demon, but you might have your block demon, who would try to tempt everyone on the block, depending on who's home at any given moment. But it's interesting, if the number is closer to 50 million, then we'd have one demon for every 120 people in the world today. But of those, say whatever the number is, 50 million demons, many of them have been locked up in Tartarus, some undoubtedly for going after strange flesh when they produced the Nephilim, the giants of old, by going into the daughters of men.
Remember when Jesus in Matthew chapter 8 confronted these demons and they cried out and said, What have we to do with you, Jesus, you son of God? Have you come here to torment us before the time? And they didn't want anything to do with Jesus.
And they didn't want to be like their fellow demons who had been locked in chains and bound up. They wanted to stay free and clear. So of the original number, how many were locked up?
We don't know. We are speaking of the same angels that jude wrote of in verse 6 of his book, the angels who did not keep their proper domain but left their own abode, that God has reserved in everlasting chains under darkness for the judgment of the great day. In Noah's day, there could have been a billion people on the earth, and it seems that the problem of angels going after women was widespread, being a major reason why God destroyed all of mankind.
So if half of the demons were locked up, we may not have as many demons as Christians generally think. And the only reason I've spent this few minutes on this topic is because there are some groups of Christians that are almost obsessed with demonology and demons and deliverance from demons. And whenever there's a problem, well, you have to get delivered from a demon.
If you have a problem with eating or with finances or with pornography, it's a demon. And they will go through an exorcism of sorts and you're delivered and you no longer have that problem. That's wonderful, except that it doesn't work.
And nowhere in the Bible does it say, well, if you're struggling with some lust of the flesh, get a demon kicked out of you and then you'll be okay. It just doesn't say that. And in the whole Bible, if we looked at the passages that refer to demons, it's just the tiny sliver of the whole book.
A very minimal focus. Now, our battle is in the spiritual realm. And that's true if any one particular person is up against Satan himself or any of his hierarchy or even some of his flunky demons.
If you find yourself in a battle with a demon and there's a demon putting thoughts in your mind and tempting you and you have this real concrete temptation and you're getting these thoughts obsessively to give into it, you might be in a battle with a demon. On the other hand, you might just be in a battle with your heart and your flesh, which is deceitful above all else. And you might be in a battle with your boss or your friend or your relative.
The point is, whoever you're in the battle with, it's a spiritual battle and it's fought in the spiritual realm because our Christian life is a spiritual entity. We live our lives in our heart, in our mind. That's where the battles are all fought.
So let's go on to verse 12. These angels were saying with a loud voice, worthy is the lamb who was slain, to receive power and riches and wisdom and strength and honor and glory and blessing. How could God possibly receive power?
I think we talked about this when we were in chapter four. How could God receive power or honor or strength? Isn't he the source of all power and all strength and all honor?
Yes, but he has delegated power and authority to us, to all the angelic realm. So if an angel honors God, if the four living creatures, all the hosts of the angels that worship God, when we worship God and we give him power, we're giving him power over our own wills. Because we couldn't give him something unless we had it.
And the determinist Christians, the Calvinists who think God is in control of every atom, every molecule, every thought, everything, then he could never receive power or authority because he has it all. And you can't receive it if you already have it. But if you've delegated power over wills so that we have a free will, and we give power and glory and honor to God, we're giving back to him the power he gave us over our wills because we submit our will to him.
We say, Lord, we want to obey you.
Verse 13, And every creature which is in heaven and on the earth and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, I heard saying, blessing and honor and glory and power be to him who sits on the throne and to the lamb forever and ever. And it's a strange reference to the creatures that are in the sea saying this. We've done a study when we were in the Book of Jonah, we went through quite a few verses in the Bible about the sea and the strange things that are said about the sea in the Bible and how it seems to be a place where demons get together.
It seems to be a place that receives the dead and the sea will give up the dead that is within it. So that down in the deep where hades is, somewhere down beneath the sea perhaps. And we know that in the new heaven and the new earth, when God creates the new earth, he says there will be no more sea.
So the sea is gone and surfing too. Forget that except for the internet. But hopefully that will be gone too.
So could it be that God's angels have freedom to travel through his created order and they could be on the planets, in the stars, on the earth, in the sea, on the land, in the air? I think so. And they don't have to breathe oxygen like we do.
And so wherever they are, as if on cue, they shout out their blessings to God.
And when we bless God, we honor him. God commands us to honor our parents because we should. And it teaches us to honor God.
When we honor our parents. So parents should be honorable. It's hard for kids to honor their parents when they're not honorable.
My kids, to the extent that they have suffered because of sin in my life, that makes me, in their eyes, less honorable. And they have suffered because of things I've done wrong to hurt our family and others. And so, in their life, if they come to a time when they decide to fully give themselves over to honor God as they grow and mature, if they do that, they've done that in part because I've taught and encouraged them to, and in part, in spite of what they've seen from me.
So because many of us in this room still have kids, and if not kids, grandkids, we have an opportunity to live honorably from this moment forward, and that our children and those around us would learn about God, not in spite of what we are doing, but because of what we are doing. Verse 14, Then the four living creatures said, Amen. And the twenty-four elders fell down and worshiped him who lives forever and ever.
And now we enter chapter six.
During this chapter, I'm going to take a diversion and look at the overview of the plagues and the torments that God will unleash on the world, just so we can get a bit of a view of what's coming, and try to figure out the order of the Book of Revelation. Is it all chronological? Is it all mixed up?
So we'll talk about that in the next few verses. Now I saw when the lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard one of the four living creatures saying with a voice like thunder, Come and see. And that word come in the Greek is ercomai.
We'll talk about that later. And I looked and behold a white horse. He who sat on it had a bow, and a crown was given to him.
And he went out conquering and to conquer. Now we begin to see God's wrath unfold from this point. This is where the first seal is opened.
The first seal is opened and a white horse as a result of this goes out to conquer. And from here to the end of the tripulation, we see the intensifying wrath and vengeance of God. Now let's consider briefly for a moment, an outline of the 21 judgments in the Book of Revelation.
There's 21 when you add up the seven seals, the seven trumpets, and the seven bowls. Now there's something, the four horsemen of the Apocalypse, but they are the first four seals. So there's really 21.
There are the seven thunders, but we won't mention them because John begins to write what they said and God said, don't write it down. So we won't even mention those guys. But the Apocalypse reveals these three consecutive series, each containing seven events.
Seals, trumpets, and bowls. Now many commentators on this book end up with a convoluted view of the book. And they say it's not in chronological order.
And you take whatever part you think comes next and you put it however you want to put it. And I think that's a mess. I think you take things in the Bible as chronological unless the Bible says it's not.
So in the scheme of his book, John presents these events, at least he intimates that he's doing that, in order. First you get the seals and you get the first scroll before the second, before the third, and so on before the seventh. Then the trumpets, then the bowls.
As we've seen in the first two verses of Revelation 6, Christ opens the first seal and in the next verse, verse three, he opens the second seal and so on through the first six. And then he gets to the seventh seal. And when he opens that, I'll read, I'll skip ahead just for the sake of the overview, Revelation 8.1, when he opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven for about half an hour.
And I saw the seven angels who stand before God and to them were given seven trumpets. And so the seven angels who had the seven trumpets prepared themselves to sound and the first angel sounded. That's all in Revelation chapter eight.
So the seventh seal is actually marking the first trumpet blast. So the seven seals lead right into the seven trumpets seamlessly. The seventh seal is the seventh trumpet blast.
As Christ is unraveling the scroll and opening the seals, and he opens the seventh seal, and it says, And there were seven trumpets. That was what was inside the seventh seal. It reminds me of when we went with Tim Gaylord, my friend, his kids, and my two boys, Josiah and Nathaniel, we went whitewater rafting on the Colorado River, and we were coming up to the seven steps, and they named the rapids.
And the rapids are pretty horrendous. They can be in the right time of the year. And you're in these huge boats with paddles, and you're semi-strapped in, in case of capsizes, you could get out.
And we go through this rapid, and the guide was flung from, she was on the opposite end of the raft that I was on, maybe 10 feet long, and she was flung through the air, and she hit into me and a guy next to me. That was pretty severe. One guy almost went over the raft, and we pulled him in.
She was on the other side, and it was finally to get to calm water, and we said, man, we're glad those, did I tell you what they were called? The seven steps. And I said, I'm glad we're through the seven steps, and she said, that was step one.
Like, oh no, where can we get out?
Well, that's what this was like. There were the seven seals, and the seven seal opens the seven trumpets. Therefore, all seven seals precede the trumpets.
It's chronological. And after the sixth trumpet sounds, after the sixth trumpet sounds, then we have, with the seventh trumpet, we're in the midpoint of the tribulation. We're in the middle of the week.
And we'll talk about that for a little bit right now. The middle of the week is four chapters, ten through thirteen. And in those chapters, how do we know they're the middle of the week?
Well, Daniel and Jesus, they both said things that look forward to the middle of the week of the tribulation, the middle of the seven years. But those chapters repeatedly warn about what's to come. And they basically say, brace yourself, because the next forty-two months are going to be tough.
And the upcoming three-and-a-half years, or the one thousand two hundred and sixty days that are coming, are going to be really bad. So in those four chapters, we read of warnings like that repeatedly. So we could tell we're in the middle of the week.
Recall that Daniel, in chapter 9, verse 27, specifically called attention to the middle of the week, period when the Antichrist would do something just abominable. And Jesus, too, referenced this midweek period in Matthew 24 and indicated it as the time that Israel would flee to the mountains. So that fleeing to the mountains that Jesus referred to is not coincidentally the same time that Revelation indicates Israel will flee into the wilderness in Revelation 12, verse 6.
It all comes together as a reasonably cohesive story of the outline of the last seven years of man's rebellion against God just before Christ returns. So the Bible, especially in Revelation, emphasizes this middle of the week as a terrible time of great consequence. These middle of the week chapters, these four, 10, 11, 12, and 13, they might be where some commentators get confused and think the whole book is not in chronological order because the stories in that middle section have one place there's a bit of a flashback, another place there's a flash forward, but it's a natural way of telling a story.
For example, in Revelation chapter 11, it's in the middle of the week that we find out that there are two prophets. God sends down two prophets to judge and condemn the earth for 42 months. They're here for 42 months and they have the power to kill those who attack them.
But it says, but at the end of their ministry, they are killed and they lie in the streets of Jerusalem for three days, their bodies unburied, and then they are resurrected. So there you are, oh no, oh my, what are we to do?
We're at the end of the Tribulation.
But big deal. It's just a little flash forward. It's the normal way historians always write.
You're telling the history of the world and you introduce a minor character, and you, in a paragraph, say, what's going to happen to him in the rest of his life, and where he's going to die? And then the very next story, you're back at the same year, the same moment in time, you introduce that person. So it doesn't mean that the Book of Revelation is not in chronological order.
And as an example of a flashback, we find the woman in Revelation 12 who is Israel. We can tell she's Israel because of comparison with Jacob and his 12 sons back in Genesis chapter 37. And there, there's depicted this brief flashback when the nation gives birth to the Messiah.
And so that's a little bit of a flashback. And then a flash forward to the middle of the Tribulation where Satan is going to attack that woman Israel, but she will flee into the wilderness and be protected by God. And that's about it.
Other than that, the Book of Revelation is chronological. And there's no reason to take all the judgments and rearrange them.
And so, Professor Dave is going to take you along the thin areas of the cheese, and while doing so, he's going to do the following. He's going to erect strawman arguments against creationists. We'll see that a lot in his videos.
You'll soon see many of examples of claims that I've never once heard any creationists ever.
In the country. This is Real Science Radio. I'm Fred Williams.
And I'm Doug McBurney, Bible student, science geek, amateur comedian Fred. It is great to be back with you talking about real science on Friday.
So today we're going to dive into some recent videos that allegedly debunk creation, and they were put out by a popular YouTuber who goes by the moniker Professor Dave. He currently has a video series that will culminate in five parts, and they're titled The Definitive Guide to Debunking Creationists. Now Doug, because of the popularity of his YouTube channel, he has like over 3 million subscribers.
He has elicited responses from prominent creation and intelligent design scientists including several at the Discovery Institute and also Dr. James Tour, who we interviewed early this year. So please be sure to leave any comments or questions you have in the comment section of our videos that we're going to do to challenge him on his alleged debunking. And if you haven't already, please be sure to hit the subscribe button and the like button.
It helps us out with the YouTube algorithms, of course. So, Doug, before we get started, can you tell us a little bit about this Professor Dave?
Well, I can only tell you what I've read. I must confess I've only imbibed very little of his video material. But it is only fair that our audience know his actual background.
His real name is David James Farina. And even though he is named after both an Apostle of jesus Christ and the King of Israel, he calls himself an atheist. According to the Discovery Institute, David James is neither a Professor nor a PhD, but just a failed ex-teacher who tried unsuccessfully to get a master's degree in chemistry.
And Fred, while his academic failures don't, I mean, that doesn't necessarily disqualify him from speaking on science. He did have to settle for a master of arts in science education, which I would think would preclude a decent person from using the moniker Professor. But his arts degree has helped him in delivering what I'm told are decent quality videos, especially in areas outside of chemistry and evolution.
I hear some of them are pretty good, but after suffering through his debate with James Tour, all the way through from James Tour's gentlemanly like introduction and his gentlemanly like postscript, right on through to David James' profanity at the end. After suffering through that, and then I did hear him embarrass himself discussing plasma astronomy. And I've just not watched any of his other stuff.
And I'm only condescending to it now, Fred, at the behest of our listeners. They reminded us that even a pretender like Dave should hear the truth in hopes that even a guy like him might eventually believe the gospel and avoid an eternity of conscious torment. An eternity of conscious torment, which is where he's headed, Fred.
And he likely knows that he's going straight to hell, Fred, because he's generally vulgar and profane and just a really nasty person, especially to people with opposing views. I mentioned the profanity with Dr. Tour, but I mean, this guy is big on personal attacks, hyperbolic rhetoric, he's also a communist, an anti-Semite, and I'm not calling him names, Fred. Check out his listing at Rational Wiki and just follow the links and you'll see.
But one thing that did surprise me, Fred, he's not gay.
Yeah, good point. So you know, Doug, for me, it was really, it's real hard to take the guy seriously. But you know, again, because he's got so many, he's built up such a big YouTube following, he's got over 3 million subscribers, and he actually disseminates, based on the videos I watched that he's put out, he does disseminate much of what secular evolutionists, scientists believe.
So based on, you know, feedback we got from our listeners and requests from our listening audience and viewing audience on YouTube, we thought, okay, this is worth dealing with some of these videos that he claims are definitive guides to debunking creationists. So we're going to go through each of his videos as we have time, and we're going to start with his first one, which is on cosmology and planetary science. So, you know, Doug, while this guy isn't a nice guy we're dealing with, he doesn't have a lot of class.
He's just, he's not a guy of high character. You hate having to say that about someone, but again, all you have to do is watch his debates with people who oppose him. So anyways, I'm going to start with a graphic that he shows on the different types of creation science, and I'm going to read this for our listening audience.
And so he's got a list from one to eight, and he starts with what he calls the most unscientific, and then it goes down to the least unscientific. So he starts with flat earth geocentrism. So right there, he's putting in something that, you know, Doug, we fight against the flat earth idea, and unfortunately, there's plenty of Christians who have fallen for that.
There's both Christians and evolutionists, in fact. I know for many years, the president of the flat earth society is an evolutionist. So you get these fringe groups on both the right and the left, and some of these fringe on the right are our friends.
But we just, you know, out of love, we kind of, we have to tell them what we believe is true, and, you know, we believe the, it's overwhelming that there's zero probability that the earth is flat. So then right after that, he lists young earth creationism. So he puts it right next to flat earth as the most unscientific.
And then he goes number three, gap creationism, and then day age creationism, and then progressive creationism, which is the Hugh Ross crowd. And then after that, he puts intelligent design, and he's going up in order of more scientific. He calls it least unscientific, and then theistic evolution, and then finally deistic evolution.
So, Fred, he lists deistic evolution and theistic evolution as more scientific than intelligent design?
Yeah, he does.
Huh, I wonder what that's all about, because theistic evolution and deistic evolution, by definition, they would involve a supernatural creator.
Yeah, so it's one step close to being an atheist, but they appeal to the secular science. They buy in with almost all of the secular science.
Well, that just strikes me as incongruous that he would not list intelligent design, which does not... Well, I guess this intelligent design does require a creator, although it could be aliens. So anyway, I think maybe seven and eight, theistic and deistic evolution, maybe that's some kind of backhanded appeal to religious people.
Anyway, it's just that was kind of weird.
Yeah. And I would say we should change this chart to most secular, unscientific and least secular, unscientific. Get the word secular in there, because that's his worldview.
Yeah. So we're now showing a chart of what we believe is the types of creation science, and we believe this is the accurate representation of what he should show. And so the most scientific we've got listed is one A, Young Earth Creation, and then one B, I put Intelligent Design.
You know, and that's provided that they don't delve into geology and go too far with any lip service towards common descent. You know, once they do that, we're good, because, you know, a lot of these guys in the ID movement are dear friends of real science radio. And we've interviewed some of their scientists.
They do great work. So those are the most scientific. And then after that is Gap Creationism.
Now we're heading down towards least scientific. After that is Progressive Creationism, and that's the Hugh Ross thing. The days are millions of years.
And the day age creation where each day is millions of years, and then they believe in some form of evolution. And then of course, theistic evolution is a complete capitulation to the secular world, secular evolutionists. And they basically just say, there is a God, but everything else is true about evolution, big bang, and all that stuff.
Tim Bates Right, which is refuted by a number of Scriptures. I know we don't have time to list the Bible verses, but it's not only unscientific, more offensive to me is it's unbiblical.
Yeah, exactly. So Doug, before we play clips from Professor Dave's videos, I wanted our audience to be on the lookout for a pattern that will become very obvious with Professor Dave. I've already watched his videos that we're going to cover, you know, completely through.
And what the audience will find is that he skirts around the evidence that outright falsifies his claims. He just kind of steers around it. He presents evolution as if the evidence is beyond overwhelming using hyperbole such as highly successful model, undeniable evidence, profound understanding, mountains of empirical evidence, high degrees of precision.
And so like every evolutionist I've ever debated through the years, they'll always admit to some problems, Doug, like, well, you know, science advances and, you know, we have, we correct things as we go because we're so honorable this and that. So while that's partly true, that's all fine and good. The problem here, Doug, is science actually falsifies their position.
So Professor Dave, he'll present evolution like this piece of Swiss cheese I'm showing right now in the video. It's this clump of Swiss cheese. It has a couple of divots in it, but no holes in it.
It's like a really healthy looking piece of Swiss cheese.
Yeah.
But in reality, Doug, this is what evolution really looks like. And now I'm showing, you know, Swiss cheese with a lot of holes that you can see, right, Doug?
It's a holy cheese right there. Yeah.
Yep.
So for our radio audience, it's holy cheese.
Yeah. So now I want to show a little animation. I'm going to kick that off right now.
And so Professor Dave is going to take you along the thin areas of the cheese. And while doing so, he's going to do the following. He's going to erect straw man arguments against creationists.
We'll see that a lot in his videos. You'll soon see many of examples of claims that I've never once heard any creationists ever make Doug ever. Now maybe there's the guy who isn't familiar with creation, but he's a Bible believer and he's just never looked at the science.
And you know, yeah, you get some comments like that. But in the creation community, you're talking answers in Genesis, ICR, Creation Research Society, and just people who have a general understanding of creation. I've never heard them make any of these arguments that he levels against us.
Second, many of the creationist talking points he mentions are comments made by secular scientists, not necessarily us. He'll also use the hyperbole that we mentioned earlier as a marketing ploy, saying, again, things like highly successful model, undeniable evidence, profound understanding, mountains of empirical evidence, high degrees of precision. He'll also use elaborate storytelling on his journey through journeying around this cheese with holes in it.
And he'll try to sell pseudo-scientific ideas around things like the Big Bang, population genetics, gradual change in the fossil record, etc. So Doug, here's the biggest one of all, and he'll largely avoid this, and that's those adjacent elephants in the room. It's those big holes in the Swiss cheese.
And it's evidence that outright falsifies the theory, so he doesn't want his audience to know about him. So I'm hoping that his audience that tunes in to watch this show will have at least somewhat of an open mind and ask themselves, are they being brainwashed by the pseudoscience that Professor Dave is pushing? So let's let the audience decide, Doug.
And so I want to start our first clip from Professor Dave's part one of his video that he claims debunks creationist talking points.
Okay, Fred, let it roll.
Many creationists deny Big Bang cosmology because they do not understand it and deliberately misrepresent it. Young Earth creationists in particular tend to picture a Kablui graphic with fully formed planets and comets tumbling out, which indeed would be preposterous.
preposterous, he says. preposterous. That's obvious straw man, Fred.
I've never met a creationist who claims that's what the secular Big Bang teaches. It's a caricature of creationism. Now, we do believe that God created everything in six days, but he's conflating that into us somehow misrepresenting what they believe about the Big Bang.
It's just completely disingenuous.
Yep, that's right, Doug. He then goes into storytelling about how elements condensed into clouds to form stars and all that fantasy land stuff, and it eventually leads to all the heavy elements. I'm going to skip that part and just let you, if the audience wants to go watch that, they'll see what I mean.
So I want to get to the next straw man that he erects against creationists, so let's roll the tape on that one.
Their arguments against Big Bang cosmology are typically ridiculous. They will say that if everything emerged from a big explosion, everything should be moving in the same direction outwards from the explosion, so how are certain things moving towards each other, like specific stars and galaxies? How is it that venus exhibits retrograde rotation, spinning the opposite direction of all the other planets?
One need only specify that, apart from the Big Bang not being an explosion, our system formed 10 billion years after the Big Bang due to totally unrelated processes, and that in general, stars didn't form for about 200 million years.
Doug, I'm not aware of any creationist saying that venus' retrograde orbit, you know, where it rotates the opposite direction of the other planets, is a problem because of an explosion, a Big Bang. That's not what we claim. No, it instead comes from their very own nebular hypothesis for the origin of our solar system that Jonathan Sarfati for Creation Ministries International, tongue-in-cheek, calls it the nebulous hypothesis.
Yeah.
So, you know, this low-grade hypothesis posits a nebula spiraling inwards, which due to the conservation of angular momentum should result in all the planets that are formed out of this fantasy to rotate in the same direction. It's called prograde. But venus rotates in the opposite direction.
And evolutionists even admit that this is a problem. And so they think venus originally was prograde. And then something knocked it off course.
So they concoct stories to try to get it to spin backwards. So he erected a total straw man argument. It's claims that they make, not us.
And we just happen to point out, yeah, why is venus spinning backwards? God's got a sense of humor. And then they have to try to explain it.
And then they come up with just those stories to try to get around it.
And then next, Fred, David James makes a rhetorical claim that I found amazing. And it speaks to your quip that the left exists in a seemingly constant state of hypocrisy.
Astronomy is perhaps the most observational branch of science, as we can simply look through telescopes and see what's going on in the universe. We can see protoplanetary disks. We can observe star formation in various stages within nebulae.
We have a profound understanding of stellar dynamics and where the elements come from. We use spectroscopy to analyze the composition of stars, and to see which molecules are capable of forming in the vacuum of space. Encourage them to visit their local observatory and make their own observations, and to ask questions that the employees will be thrilled to answer.
Most will refuse, which says a lot about the willful nature of their ignorance, which you may point out to them.
So Doug, I'm pretty sure that it's the secular astronomers. They're the ones who are not going to want us to ask the tough questions, because the first thing we point out is that huge elephant in the room, that big hole in the Swiss cheese he doesn't want his audience to know about, and that's the fact that the James Webb Telescope is finding these fully formed galaxies where they aren't supposed to be, way back early towards the Big Bang. And here's a quote from a secular astronomer.
Now this comes from an article the headline reads, Web spots super old massive galaxies that shouldn't exist. So this is what Erica Nelson said. She's an assistant professor of astrophysics at the University of Colorado Boulder.
She says, it's bananas. Doug, it's bananas. You just don't expect the early universe to be able to organize itself that quickly.
These galaxies should not have had time to form. Now, why isn't Professor Dave talking about all the discoveries of the James Webb and the Hubble Telescope? We already knew some of this before.
The James Webb just went on to confirm a lot of this stuff.
And you don't need a telescope to see those elephants because they're right there. And David James must have never heard Bob Enyart's interview with Christian creationist Jim Burr, right? Recognized throughout the world for his achievements in actually designing and manufacturing telescopes.
Christians aren't afraid of telescopes. We like telescopes just fine. That's a pretty big hole in their theory.
The James Webb Telescope and all the discoveries, yeah, you hear crickets on that. And we've added that to our list, by the way, of shocked evolutionists. Everyone who looks through that James Webb Telescope, if they're an evolutionist, they're shocked.
And, all right, so let's roll the next clip where if I'm not mistaken, David James is going to elucidate the fine-tuning of the universe.
More intelligent creationists will bring up what is called the fine-tuning argument. It applies to the physical parameters of the universe as understood by science, so it does not support Young Earth creationism, but could be seen as supporting deistic evolution, at least at face value. The universe has a number of physical constants, or quantitative values pertaining to fundamental characteristics that one might propose could potentially have had totally different values.
These would include the fundamental unit of electric charge found on the electron, the ratio of the mass of the proton to the mass of the electron, the magnitude of the strong nuclear force, the gravitational constant we refer to as big G, the cosmological constant that determines the rate of the universe's expansion, and several others. It is often said by creationists that if any of these parameters differed from their current values by even a few percent, that life would be impossible, and in some cases, star formation or even atom formation would be impossible.
Well, I have news for Professor Dave. See this book I'm holding right here, Doug? It's called Rare Earth, and it's co-authored by Dr. Donald Brownlee.
He's a professor of astronomy at Washington University. He's the same Brownlee, Dr. Brownlee, that our very own Kevin Lee has interacted with regarding the overwhelming evidence that asteroids are floating rock piles that originated from Earth, from the global flood. The evidence continues to pile in.
So the arguments of fine tuning are being made from these two secular evolutionists. So these aren't creationist talking points, Professor Dave. These two guys conclude that because of the fine tuning, they quote, even simple animal life is most likely extremely rare in the entire universe.
And again, it's because of all the fine tuning things that we see in the universe that they document in this book. So, so much for a creationist talking point.
Uh-huh. And then David James goes on to propose explanations, including the wacky, unprovable multiverse fantasy. But to his credit, he does at least admit that that's a fairly weak argument.
He then muses that it could be intelligent life putting us in a simulation and emphasizes, of course, that it's not a god or a deity or anything like that. And wasn't David James accusing creationists of incredulity earlier? Didn't I hear that?
Incredulity? What? So anyway, so far his debunking, the cupboard is bare, as far as I can tell, so far, Fred.
Yeah, good point, Doug. So let's continue to roll the tape, and now this next thing is on the Hubble constant.
So we can continue with creationist talking points that specifically contradict science. Going back to specific aspects of Big Bang cosmology, some creationists will learn basic astrophysics terminology in an effort to pretend they can refute scientific methods for determining the age of the universe. It should be made clear that the accepted value of 13.787 billion years plus or minus 200 million years is supported by a mountain of empirical evidence from multiple lines of inquiry.
First, this can be derived from measuring the expansion of the universe through the red shifting of galaxies as a function of distance. Sources of visible light that are moving towards an observer are blue shifted, meaning the waves get bunched up, while those moving away from an observer are red shifted, meaning the waves get stretched out. just like how an ambulance will have the sound waves from its siren pitched up while approaching you and then pitched down once they pass you.
The farther away the galaxy is, the greater the red shift, which tells us how much the universe has expanded since that light was emitted, and this data can be plotted to get something called the Hubble Constant. The reciprocal of the Hubble Constant will give us an estimation for the age of the universe.
Fred, all of that scientific nomenclature, I just don't know what to do as a creationist. I wish I would have learned more of it so I could pretend I understand more of it.
Yeah. So, what's the hole in the cheese, Doug, he's leaving out in this latest clip?
Well, he's about five years behind the times. And by the way, when did it become 13.787? Did that just happen in the last 0.787 minutes?
I thought it was 13.452. Now it's 13.787. Well, that's news to me.
But anyway, Professor Dave is about 5.725 years behind because NASA reported back in 2019 that the Hubble constant has been contradicted by findings, ironically, by the Hubble Telescope.
Which is pretty cool.
I mean, you can't write that, right? You couldn't write that in a screenplay. Fred, we'll link to this article titled Mystery of the Universe's Expansion Rate Widenes with New Hubble Data.
The author bemuses that new theories may be needed to explain the forces that have shaped the cosmos there. David James.
Well, Doug, not only that, you mentioned the age of the universe and they always try to give it this exact number, 13.5689235, because we're so smart, we got it really narrowed down. Well, you know, there's this noble winning astrophysicist, he now claims that the age of the universe is off by about a billion.
A billion?
Yeah, a billion. I wonder if he really means 989.5672593.
You're off by that much.
plus or minus 200 million. plus or minus 200 million. I heard David James stick that one in.
It's 13.787 billion, plus or minus 200 billion, which means you really don't need to say the 787. But he's just, you know, Fred, he talks about creationist trying to learn the vernacular so we can pretend, but he's just regurgitating vernacular that he's imbibed and he's really pretending.
Yeah, yeah. So Doug, we've got an extensive list of evidence against the Big Bang, and you can go to rsr.org/bigbang. You know, the late great Bob Enyart did a great job of putting all these lists together.
We're trying to add to them as we can. And you can buy our fantastic video on evidences against the Big Bang. It's in my top two of all the videos that we provide through our store.
And that's at rsr.org/store. So please consider getting that if you haven't, it supports our radio and YouTube ministry. And as we try to reach as many people as we can.
And that video has evidence. It's just undeniable. It's crystal clear.
The Big Bang is just not true. There's way too many things that... It's not just evidence against the Big Bang, Doug.
There's things that just outright falsify it. So please get that video. And by the way, again, we'll remind you, like this video that you're watching on YouTube, if you're one of our YouTube video watchers.
And also leave comments in the section. We'll try to respond to them. If you have questions, if you feel like there's things we should have talked about, if you think we made a mistake on anything, please let us know.
And we will be monitoring the comments and we'll respond to them as we can.
Absolutely. And only like the show if you actually like it. If you don't like it, and don't like it.
Do they have a don't like button?
Go for it.
Do they have a I don't like this button? They do.
They have an unlike.
You can click that one too. And then be sure to leave a comment though. because we want to know.
So Fred, I'm still waiting for David James to come out with an actual creationist talking point that he's claiming to refute. I mean, he's basically listed a tired and already refuted bunch of Big Bang arguments. And so let's roll and here is the next one.
Then there is the ratio of hydrogen to helium in the universe, which is about 3 to 1. That there is so much helium indicates that the universe was once hot enough to fuse protons and neutrons, which is explained by the nucleosynthesis aspect of the Big Bang model. No other model can account for this observation in general, and they certainly cannot account for this precise ratio that is specifically predicted by the duration of the nucleosynthesis epoch as demanded by the model.
So this is a classic case of cherry-picking data and molding it to fit the alleged prediction. So we'll find out that later in the video this professor, David James...
David James is what his mom calls him when she's mad at him. That's a state of mind that he needs to be in right now. It's like he's been busted by his mom.
I like it. So we'll find later in the video that David James claims that we cherry-picked the data. That's a classic case of the pot calling the kettle black.
You know, but once again, we don't need creationist talking points to refute this. We can use evolutionists' own words. And you can get this at our rsr.org/bigbang or evidence against the big bang.
So a paper in Nature magazine describes the particulars of this prediction as, quote, assumed ad hoc to obtain the required or predicted abundances. And then there's a thing in physics essays that, quote, the study of historical data shows that over the years, predictions of the ratio of helium to hydrogen in a big bang universe have been repeatedly adjusted to agree with the latest available estimates of that ratio as observed in the real universe. So again, David James, these are not creationist talking points.
Are you debunking your own people on your own side? I don't think so. So are you gonna say that they're wrong?
What's your position here?
Yeah. Wait, Fred, we can't roll the next video. Everyone's on the edge of their seat waiting for the interesting fact of the week.
We can't forget that.
Good point, Doug. Okay, so we're gonna do the interesting fact of the week. And after we do that, we're gonna talk about the next clip in this guy's video, which is Cosmic Background Radiation.
Okay. So Doug, here is the interesting fact of the week. What is the most abundant element in the universe?
Cockroaches. No, no, wait.
That could be, yeah, the universe of Florida.
No, I think it's, I think it's hydrogen.
See, there I go again, Doug. I hit the wrong button.
That's because you always assume that I'm wrong.
All right, Doug, congratulations.
Anyway, Fred, going with your gut, going with your gut is generally correct with me, so.
Good one. Okay, so hydrogen, you are correct.
Awesome. Okay. Hey, and weren't we just talking about the ratio of helium to hydrogen, right?
And David James says, no other model can explain da da da da da. How can you say that? How can you say that no other model can explain as if you've reviewed every model and every possible model that could, that's just that that's the kind of hyperbole that you warn people about in the beginning.
Exactly. Okay. So let's roll the tape now on what he says about cosmic background radiation.
Finally, there is the cosmic microwave background radiation, something which was specifically predicted by Big Bang cosmology, and then subsequently observed. This is a perfect blackbody spectrum permeating the cosmos, which is a remnant of the recombination epoch, when electrons first coupled with atomic nuclei and relaxed to the ground state, emitting photons and causing the universe to become transparent for the first time. This occurred 380,000 years after the initial singularity, and since has been stretched out by the expansion of the universe to measure 2.7 kelvin with extreme isotropy, meaning the same in every direction.
Okay, first of all, the CMB prediction is an example of historical revisionism. But you know what, Fred, we could give that one to him, right? We could give that one to the Big Bang evolutionist side that David James represents, and we can talk about the scores of predictions the Big Bang has failed on.
Okay, just to name a few, Fred. An entire universe of missing anti-matter. Where is that, David James?
And then, homogeneity and isotropy. The contradictions to the Big Bang's foundational predictions of homogeneity and isotropy, including the enormous cold spot, quantized red shifts, the axis of evil. You can learn more about this.
just go to rsr.org/bigbangprediction.
Yes. And Doug, this gets to another huge elephant in the room. A big hole in the cheese that he's steering around, and he's not telling his listeners about it.
It's one of, I've always really enjoyed this argument. At the end of the clip, he said that the CMB shows extreme isotropy. Yeah.
So, extreme, Doug. So, he's wrong yet again. David James, you're wrong again.
And that's because of what secular astronomers have coined, and you mentioned it here recently, Doug. You said the axis of evil. They call it evil because it totally uphins their entire Big Bang cosmology model.
So, and why call anything evil if it's science? I mean, obviously, that's not a scientific statement. We've said many times they like to use words that aren't scientific because they're just, you know, they're just so disappointed that their atheistic worldview doesn't work.
It's bananas.
It's bananas, it's horrendous, all these different things. So this whole axis of evil, it outright falsifies their claim. And this is where the Planck satellite, it showed a universe with a slightly warmer hemisphere below Earth's orbit.
So that is the cosmic background radiation should be randomly distributed. It should be extreme isotropy, as he claims. But Planck revealed that one half of the universe has bigger CMV variations than the other.
And that variation, Doug, extends right through the Earth's axis. So imagine a globe cut in two of the universe, and right through the center happens to sit Earth's axis, where these differences in temperature occur.
Yeah, that's right. And by the way, that reminds me, Fred, at the very beginning when you showed David James chart, he listed flat Earth with geocentrism. He mushed those together as if, but those don't necessarily have to be mushed together.
So the idea that the Earth could be either at the center of the universe or very close to the center of the universe has nothing to do with flat Earth, okay? I almost missed that. I wanted to point that out.
And then to this issue of the axis of evil, what's funny is a report that happened before Planck, because they were, remember, they were hoping that it would rescue them and show that it was just noise in the data. They said the European Space Agencies recently launched the Planck Telescope and that might settle the issue when it makes the most sensitive maps yet of the CMB. Until then, the axis of evil continues to terrorize us.
I'll link to the article, Fred, in the summary. Now, after Planck confirmed the axis of evil, that's right, the axis of evil was confirmed by Planck, we have then this quote, the fact that Planck has made such a significant detection of these anomalies erases any doubts about their reality. It can no longer be said they are artifacts of the measurements, they are real, and we have to look for a credible explanation.
Who's the we? It's not Young Earth Creationists, it's Paolo Natoli of the European Space Agency back in 2013.
So Doug, we're halfway through his part one, and now we're finally going to get to a Creationist talking point, where something we actually say, but Doug, I think we have to save that for our next show. I think we're running out of time.
Wow, we can't even get to one actual Christian Creationist talking point.
Well we're going to get to it, but it will have to be next week. So people will have to watch next week's show or listen to us on the radio. And David James finally gets to something that, yes, we actually said, and we'll see if he debunked it.
Okay, well I think that's a classic tease, Fred. So you got a future in the radio business. That's perfect.
You got a future as a YouTuber, Fred. Hey, I'll love getting back together with you next Friday, Fred. I look forward to it.
Okay, let's do it. So for Doug McBurney, I'm Fred Williams of Real Science Radio. May God bless you.
* Revelation: The Book of Revelation vents God's final warning toward those who will not follow Him. Often clouded in mystery, this book has eluded the understanding of millions, and has been used as a pretext for many false prophets. Bob Enyart presents this conclusion of Scripture in light of the Bible's overview. This clear method of study helps to cut through much of the confusion regarding Revelation.
For over a quarter century Bob Enyart has studied God's Word praying for the wisdom to share the truth of Scripture with a lost and dying world. Now you can benefit from this very exciting Bible study. The two Revelation albums address matters of eternal consequence head on. Before listening to these tapes, Bob strongly urges that you read The Plot book or listen to The Plot album that will introduce you to the overview of the Bible. Available on MP3-CD or download.
BEL SUBSCRIPTIONS: Please consider one of our monthly subscriptions that will not only help support BEL, but they also promote better understanding of the Bible and may equip you to more effectively reach those around you.
Monthly Audio & Video Downloads: Now you can subscribe to monthly sermons, Bible studies or topical videos in download form.
Monthly Sermons: Enjoy all of Bob's sermons from the month on Sermon Video DVD, great also to watch with the family. Or, get these on Sermon Audio CDs which are standard audio Compact Discs that will play on any CD player including the one in your car. Or get them on a single Sermon MP3-CD which will play on an MP3 player, in a DVD player, or in your computer.
Monthly Bible Studies: Enjoy the Scriptures with Bob's Monthly Bible Study DVDs, great too for a small group Bible study. Or get these teachings on a single Monthly Bible Study Audio MP3- CD which will play on an MP3 player, in a DVD player, or in your computer.
Monthly Topical Videos: Coming to your mailbox, you'll get a Monthly Topical DVD to enjoy one of Bob's great videos specially selected to be entertaining and to teach about life from a biblical worldview.
Monthly BEL TV Classics: Enjoy Bob Enyart's timeless, popular TV show delivered to your home on the Monthly BEL TV Classics DVDs with great audio and video clarity thanks to our state-of-the-art mastering from the studio-quality Sony beta tapes to DVD!
Monthly Donation: For folks who just want to make sure that Bob Enyart Live stays on the air, please consider making a pledge in the form of a Monthly Donation.
Greetings to the brightest audience in the country, and welcome to Theology Thursday. I'm Nicole McBurney. Every weekday, we bring you the news of the day, the culture, and science from a Christian worldview.
But today, join me and Pastor Bob Enyart as we explore the source of our Christian worldview, the Bible.
Revelation chapter 5, verse 1. And I saw in the right hand of him who sat on the throne, a scroll written inside and on the back, sealed with seven seals. Now, this is what everybody's been looking forward to, at least most people studying the Book of Revelation.
We want to know when it all comes down, what's going to happen. When God finally, when his anger overcomes his mercy and his patience, and he says, that's it, this is where we come to. Now, who is it that's on the throne holding the scroll?
It's God the Father, as we'll see tonight, God the Son, Jesus Christ, as a lamb, the Lamb of God, he comes and takes the scroll from the Father and begins to implement its instructions. It says that it's a scroll written inside and on the back. So it's double-sided.
Now a scroll is typically written on papyrus, which is a reed, and they take the reed and dry it. It's in long strips, and then they glue them together horizontally on, let's say, the front surface of it and on the back vertically. So it makes a nice durable material to write on, and you write horizontally.
You wouldn't want to write on the back because you have to go against the strips. So even though materials were rather rare thousands of years ago, they still typically only had single-sided scrolls. They broke that rule if they're desperate enough, but this scroll here, we're told, is double-sided.
Verse 2, Then I saw a strong angel proclaiming with a loud voice, Who is worthy to open the scroll and to loose its seals? And no one in heaven or on the earth or under the earth was able to open the scroll or to look at it. Wow.
This must must have been some heavy-duty seals on this scroll and one powerful scroll. So I wept much. Now we'll think about that in a moment.
Why is he weeping? I wept much because no one was found worthy to open and read the scroll, or to look at it. Now, why is John weeping?
This is an emotional comment in the Bible, unlike others that are in there, seems to come out of nowhere. You know, if somebody is going to weep, the story builds up and then they weep. And John sees the scroll.
And what's in the scroll? Well, we know that what's in it is the plan of judgment and vengeance and wrath that God will unleash on the wicked. And so, no one is there to open the scroll to begin the judgment.
And John is beside himself almost immediately with anguish. He wants the judgment to begin. Let it begin.
And he's upset that it's not happening.
Millions of people, as these scrolls will not only, there's about five pretty devastating things that happen with these scrolls. And the seventh scroll announces the first trumpet. And there are seven trumpets.
And then the trumpets lead into the seven thunders, which bring us to the seven bowls. And it's millions of people, hundreds of millions of people are destroyed. And that's what happens when you start to unravel the scroll.
So imagine John, Christians think of John, this loving and tender, the beloved disciple. And he is waiting for God's wrath to be unleashed. He's anxious for it.
And the way I understand Christian teaching that's common, that would be sinful to be looking forward to God's wrath. That would be wrong. We're taught not to look forward to that.
But the Bible obviously has a different perspective. John is weeping because countless millions of people are not going to be plagued, starved, killed with the sword, killed by earthquakes, or torn by beasts of the field. You know, nicer than God churches wouldn't approve of that emotional reaction from John.
But here it is. Verse 5. But one of the elders said to me, Do not weep.
Behold the lion of the tribe of Judah. The root of David has prevailed to open the scroll and to loose its seven seals. That's exciting.
Jesus Christ is the one described as the lion of the tribe of Judah. When Jacob blessed his twelve sons in Genesis chapter 49, some of the comments that he made to them turned into emblems or symbols of that tribe. And I'll give you one right now.
Judah, the lion of the tribe of Judah in Genesis 49.9, Jacob said, Judah is a lion's whelp from the prey, my son, you have gone up. He bows down, he lies down as a lion, and as a lion, who shall rouse him? And Jesus Christ came from the tribe of Judah, Jacob's fourth son, chronologically.
And so, and he is called the lion of the tribe of Judah. Judah has the symbol of a lion, and Christ is the lion. He is the king.
Okay, and who is this that's going to open the scrolls, open the scroll and loose the seals, if we didn't know it was Jesus? We'll get to this later in the study. But many commentators insist that the wrath of God does not appear in the in the tribulation.
They say it's not the wrath of God, it's the wrath of Satan. Now that's untenable. And many of the post-tribulationists believe that.
They believe that the tribulation is the wrath of Satan, and afterward when Christ comes back, that's the day of the Lord, but the tribulation is all Satan's wrath. We'll see that that's not tenable. Also, those who believe in a mid-tribulation rapture, and a pre-wrath rapture, they teach that all this part of the tribulation is the wrath of Satan, and the wrath of man, not the wrath of God.
So we look at this and we say, well, who is it that's going to open the scroll and unleash its judgments? It's Christ. It's the lion of the tribe of Judah, the root of David.
Verse 6, And I looked and behold, in the midst of the throne, and of the four living creatures, in the midst of the of the elders. And that's the 24 elders on the thrones, stood a lamb as though it had been slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven spirits of God, sent out into all the earth. Now these seven spirits are the seven angels that were mentioned in Revelation 1, 2, 3, and 4.
So here they are again. And mystery could be built into, well, what are these seven spirits? Is it the Holy Spirit?
Are there eight Holy Spirits? Holy Spirit in seven compartments? But the Bible makes pretty clear that these spirits are angels, as we've seen in our past week's studies.
The seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven spirits of God, sent out into all the earth. Remember we looked at Zechariah chapter four, and we saw, Now the angel said to me, What do you see? So I said, Seven lamps.
These seven are the eyes of the Lord, which scan to and fro throughout the whole earth. So God has angels who are at his right hand. And if he chooses to, he could send out the angels to see what's going on in Sodom and Gomorrah.
I'm too disgusted. I don't want to look. Go look and tell me.
Or he could go and look. God is mighty, and he's able to look or to not look, or to send an intermediary to look. Well, the lamb will open the scroll because the witnesses against the earth confirm and corroborate one another, that the people of the earth deserve great and terrible judgment to be poured out on them.
So therefore, the lamb stood. The lamb had been slain, and he was about ready to unleash judgment for a couple of reasons. One, because he had created the world as a paradise, and Adam and Eve and their descendants to love and honor God and one another.
And instead, they have done nothing, as a figure of speech, nothing but continuously hurt one another with violence and suffering that they have imposed on one another. And God is fed up with it. So God is going to cap the rebellion.
Verse 7, Then he came, that's Jesus, the lamb, and took the scroll out of the right hand of him who sat on the throne from his father. Now, when he had taken the scroll, the four living creatures and the 24 elders fell down before the lamb, each having a harp and golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints. And the mediating of these prayers reminds one of priestly duties.
It makes you think of that. We'll talk about that more in a couple of minutes. The lamb will open this scroll of damnation and death, partly in answer to the prayers of the saints.
Those saints who are praying, Lord, don't delay. Bring your judgment, bring your wrath. Their prayers, here before the Lord in heaven, will be answered.
And that is part of what is going on when Christ decides, now I'm going to open the scroll.
They are golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints. We could spend a lot of time looking at verses about incense in the Bible, but I think we'll just look at one. The English word incense appears in the New King James 144 times.
And in Psalm 141 verse 2, let my prayer be set before you as incense, the lifting up of my hands as the evening sacrifice. So let my prayer be set before you as incense. God is in the heavens, in heaven, in heaven above, and when you light incense, the smoke drifts upward.
And so it's symbolic. So there was an altar in the temple, and we know that Zacharias, twice a year, would go into the temple at the time of Christ's birth, and he would offer incense. The people outside would smell the incense, and that would be part of their worship.
And it was when Zacharias was in there, getting ready to burn the incense to offer to God, that the angel told him that he and Elizabeth would have a child in their old age, who would be John the Baptist. And that angel appeared on the right side of the table of incense. And meanwhile, outside the temple, right at that hour, the people were praying.
And that's the picture God uses symbolically of incense. Verse 9, And they sang a new song, saying, You are worthy to take the scroll and to open its seals, for you were slain and have redeemed us to God by your blood out of every tribe and tongue and people and nation. You are worthy because you were slain.
Therefore, you're worthy to bring judgment and wrath. Christ, there are two reasons that he was prepared to do this. The first was because he created us and we rebelled.
And the second, because he came to save us and the world turned against him, even him, and wrongly judged him and punished him in the crucifixion. And for those two reasons, one, we could say rather personal, he was ready to come an exact judgment. Notice that these 24 elders, they sang to Christ that he has redeemed them to God by your blood of every tribe and nation.
This is why I believe that they are men, these 24 elders. It seems strange that the four living creatures would join in on this song. But perhaps that is understandable.
They could sing along as a sign of unity, even though the words did not directly apply to them. Remember the four living creatures with the face of a lion, an eagle, a man, and an ox. Like a love song sung to a woman on the radio, and women are driving in rush hour traffic, and they are singing along, and they are not singing the song to the woman.
They are just singing along. Here is a guy singing something from his heart, and I like it, and I am going to sing with him. And that could be exactly what the four living creatures are doing, singing this song, without any legalistic worry interfering.
Since they sang a new song, that means, what does that mean? They sang a new song. It had not previously been sung in heaven, which is one of many confirmations that yes, there is time in heaven.
There is time for one song, then there is time for another song, and when you get there, you could write yet another song. There would be an even newer song in heaven. So there is time, there is now and then, in heaven.
If there was no time in heaven, there could never be anything new ever in heaven. If there was no time. And believe me, when you get to heaven, there will be something new there.
Something quite unlike anything that had ever been there before. When any of us get there. So, of course, heaven is constantly changing, just with the never-ending stream of souls who arrive there, who have put their faith in God.
Verse 10, okay, there's a song being sung to God, and God is told, and you have made us kings and priests to our God, and we shall reign on the earth. Kings and priests. This shows the Jewish character of the book.
The people of God in the Book of Revelation are the 12 tribes of Israel, and their covenant is the new covenant based on circumcision, the covenant of circumcision and the law. That's the group to whom this book is written, the people of God. We'll see that in a bit when 12,000 are sealed from each of the 12 tribes of Israel.
Way back in Exodus chapter 19, you shall be to me a kingdom of priests. And that's what we have here. Christ has made us kings and priests to our God.
As one of the 12 apostles wrote to the believing Jews of the dispersion, 1 Peter 2.9, he wrote, You are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a royal, a kingly priesthood. Now, why are there 24 thrones and 24 elders when the number 12 signifies Israel? Well, King David divided the priesthood into 24 divisions.
Not the entire priesthood, not all of the Levites, but of the Levites, Aaron was a Levite. Remember Moses' brother, Miriam's brother, Aaron. And Aaron was the high priest.
And he had four kids, two of them were killed because they were evil, right off the bat. And the other two ended up with many thousands of descendants. And at the time of David, which was centuries later, about five centuries later, David divided the descendants of Aaron into 24 divisions, the 24 courses, the 24 divisions of the priesthood.
And each one, he went into the descendants of Aaron, and he found a strong man, a father, of 24 different families that Aaron's sons had split into. And he made each one a leader of a certain group of the descendants of the high priest. And they were as a group then responsible for serving the Lord at the temple.
And they would take turns. They'd go for one week from the Sabbath to the Sabbath, and then the next group and the next group. When they went through all 24, they'd start over.
And they'd do that each year. And the eighth group, the group that would go in the eighth week of the year, was of the division of Abijah. And Abijah, that is whom Zacharias and Elizabeth were descendants of.
He was in the order of Abijah, and that's who John the Baptist was of that order. So David, he took the priest, specifically the high priest's descendants, and divided them into 24 divisions. And so it's possible that these 24 thrones with 24 elders, of course, Israel's 12, double that as 24, in heaven and on earth, it could be that they are emblematic symbols of the priestly kingdom of Israel.
And in that way, in that respect, symbols of the whole group of redeemed Israel. Perhaps these are not always 24 particular individuals. It could be that from time to time, those saved among Israel get to go to the throne room of God and sit on that throne and from Sabbath to Sabbath worship the Lord.
We don't know. But if so, then that would work following the model of the priesthood that was implemented by David through the Old Testament. And we shall reign on the earth.
And that is what they are looking forward to. God promised Israel an earthly kingdom. And Jesus Christ came in encouraging them that the meek shall inherit heaven.
Is that what he said? No, he said the meek shall inherit the earth. Christians, rightly today, have a focus that we are citizens of heaven and we plan to live forever in heaven.
But God creates a new heaven and a new earth. And the new Jerusalem comes down out of heaven onto the new earth and becomes the center, the capital, if you will, of the kingdom on earth, of God's kingdom on earth. And that's for Israel.
And that's where the twelve tribes will live. And that's where the twelve gates to the new Jerusalem, the city, and the names of the twelve apostles, and the twelve thrones that Jesus spoke of, that the twelve apostles will sit on those thrones, judging the tribes of Israel. So that is all going to happen.
And that's what these elders are looking forward to, reigning on the earth, not in heaven, which is another of so many indications that this is a Jewish book for believing Israel in the circumcision, not for the body of Christ. Verse 11, Then I looked and I heard the voice of many angels around the throne, the living creatures and the elders, and the number of them was ten thousand times ten thousand and thousands of thousands. There are many angels up in heaven that are willing to worship God and serve him, and at his command could fly down to the earth and one angel back in the Old Testament destroyed the Assyrian army.
How many soldiers did he kill in one night? I think it was a hundred and eighty-five thousand Assyrians. You know, it's interesting looking in the history of the world.
Well, I didn't put this in my notes. I'm trying to recall who wrote this brief history of the world. It's in two massive volumes that I have at the office.
Maybe I'll recall who wrote it, but he's not a believer. He's not a Christian. He doesn't like the Bible, but he mentions in there, when you go back and read about the Assyrian Empire, he says, in the Assyrian Army, at one point, at the right point in the Bible's history, was on its way to Egypt in a plague destroyed the Assyrian Army.
And I think that was pretty coincidental. HG. Wells.
Thank you very much. That's right. So God has a lot of angels, and those angels represent a tremendous amount of power.
How many angels are there? And if a third of the angels fell, how many angels would that mean? How many demons are there?
Well, we don't know how many angels there are. If this estimation here is anywhere near literal within any kind of ballpark, that would mean there were 153 million angels originally created. Now, I don't think this is really a literal statement.
I think it's a figure of speech, but it might put us in a ballpark. There might be many more. But 10,000 times 10,000 would be 100 million, and thousands of thousands would be at least a couple million.
So that would be 102 million, and if there were originally a third that fell, that would be 153 million, with 51 million demons. Now, we have no idea, of course, if that's the case. Maybe there's twice as many fallen angels, 100 million, or three times as many, 150 million, or four times, or five times, maybe a quarter of a billion.
You know, if there were a quarter of a billion fallen angels, that would be one for every 24 people in the world. So, you couldn't have your own demon, but you might have your block demon, who would try to tempt everyone on the block, depending on who's home at any given moment. But it's interesting, if the number is closer to 50 million, then we'd have one demon for every 120 people in the world today.
But, of those, say whatever the number is, 50 million demons, many of them have been locked up in Tartarus. Some undoubtedly for going after strange flesh, when they produced the Nephilim, the giants of old, by going into the daughters of men. Remember when Jesus in Matthew chapter 8 confronted these demons and they cried out and said, what have we to do with you, Jesus, you son of God?
Have you come here to torment us before the time? And they didn't want anything to do with Jesus. And they didn't want to be like their fellow demons who had been locked in chains and bound up.
They wanted to stay free and clear. So, of the original number, how many were locked up? We don't know.
We are speaking of the same angels that Jude wrote of in verse 6 of his book, the angels who did not keep their proper domain but left their own abode, that God has reserved in everlasting chains under darkness for the judgment of the great day. In Noah's day, there could have been a billion people on the earth, and it seems that the problem of angels going after women was widespread, being a major reason why God destroyed all of mankind. So if half of the demons were locked up, we may not have as many demons as Christians generally think.
The only reason I've spent this few minutes on this topic is because there are some groups of Christians that are almost obsessed with demonology and demons and deliverance from demons. And whenever there's a problem, well, you have to get delivered from a demon. If you have a problem with eating or with finances or with pornography, it's a demon.
And they will go through an exorcism of sorts and you're delivered and you know no longer have that problem. That's wonderful, except that it doesn't work. And nowhere in the Bible does it say, well, if you're struggling with some lust of the flesh, get a demon kicked out of you and then you'll be okay.
It just doesn't say that. And in the whole Bible, if we looked at the passages that refer to demons, it's just a tiny sliver of the whole book, a very minimal focus. Now, our battle is in the spiritual realm.
And that's true if any one particular person is up against Satan himself or any of his hierarchy or even some of his flunky demons. If you find yourself in a battle with a demon and there's a demon putting thoughts in your mind and tempting you and you have this real concrete temptation and you're getting these thoughts obsessively to give into it, you might be in a battle with a demon. On the other hand, you might just be in a battle with your heart and your flesh, which is deceitful above all else.
And you might be in a battle with your boss or your friend or your relative. The point is, whoever you're in the battle with, it's a spiritual battle. And it's fought in the spiritual realm.
Because our Christian life is a spiritual entity. We live our lives in our heart, in our mind. That's where the battles are all fought.
So let's go on to verse 12. These angels were saying with a loud voice, Worthy is the lamb who was slain, to receive power and riches and wisdom and strength and honor and glory and blessing.
Hey, this is Nicole McBurney jumping in to the broadcast. We are out of time for today, so be sure to come back next Thursday to hear the rest of this study. To find other resources and Bible studies, be sure to go to kgov.com/store.
That's kgov.com/store.
LEGACY BROADCAST
Bob Enyart, co-founder of opentheism.org, continues his interview of Dr. Richard Rice, a leading advocate of Open Theism, just retired Loma Linda theology professor, and co-author of the famed 1994 book The Openness of God with Pinnock, Hasker, Basinger, and Sanders. The guys continue their relaxed yet compelling discussion.
* KGOV & Richard Rice:
- kgov.com/richard-rice (6/9/20)
- kgov.com/richard-rice-2 (10/20/20)
- kgov.com/richard-rice-3 (10/21/20 this program)
- And see Richard features on the homepage of opentheism.org.
Today's Resource: Open Theism Seminar
Open theism seminar with Bob Enyart on three DVDs!
BEL January 2007 Seminar Indianapolis, IN
Another fantastic BEL seminar, this time, on the topic of Open Theism, answering the question, is the future settled or open? The Open View teaches that God can change the future. He interacts with the flow of history and changes the outcome of the future as it unfolds by His decisions and actions.
Greetings to the brightest audience in the country, and welcome to Bob Enyart Live. Today, we're going back to a 2020 interview. This is Bob Enyart with Dr. Richard Rice.
Dr. Richard Rice, he's the person who coined the term open theism, right? Open theism is an idea that goes really far back, but open theism, those two words being added together, that only happened relatively recently, and that was coined by Dr. Richard Rice. So this is Bob's interview with Dr. Rice.
You do not want to miss such a fun interview. Now let's jump right in to the broadcast.
Greetings to the brightest audience in the country. Welcome to Bob Enyart Live. I'm the pastor of Denver Bible Church.
Today, we will broadcast the conclusion of our interview with the man who put two words together, Open Theism, Dr. Richard Rice, with his first book on the topic 40 years ago. His latest book is called The Future of Open Theism. If you'd like to listen to yesterday's broadcast, just go to our website, kgov.com/openhyphentheism.
You'll find the link there. Now, let's join the discussion in progress. Whenever there's an analogy, the Bible uses many analogies.
They're analogies. They're not direct. They're, as analogs, therefore, not literally, but to then argue that most of what the Bible says about God is metaphor, I think stretches beyond the breaking point, the Bible's claim itself, because the Bible presents God as good and holy and merciful and awesome, and he's the judge, he's the savior.
So overwhelmingly, it seems that what the Bible tells us about God is literal, even though it's often using metaphors or analogies to make the literal truth about God more clear from certain perspectives.
yes, we need to be careful about, in our description, our portrayal of biblical language, because as I've indicated, I think there's quite a range here. And I think if we were to say, okay, take the contrasting symbolic descriptions of God as shepherd and king. Now, how many characteristics does God have in common with shepherds that we see on hillsides?
And how many characteristics would God have in common with earthly monarchs? Well, we might say king gives us a little more about God than a shepherd does. A shepherd may communicate some perspectives on God.
Perhaps a king gives us a bit more. But then when it comes to the kingship of God, it's interesting how that symbol, when you look at the way that God exercises sovereignty in a sense, I would say turns that symbol inside out and says God is not just a sovereign, but God is a sovereign unlike any human sovereign. So to see what the sovereignty of God does not mean that God is an uncaring person totally committed to his own power over.
But God is a sovereign that is unlike the sovereigns that we see on earth. So there's a certain irony and a certain, you might call it deconstructive quality to the symbols when they're applied to God. And we see it's the difference between God, when we think of God in this way, to others.
For me, that is a way of saying, attributing fatherhood to God in view of some of the critiques of that as being sexist language and saying, okay, thinking of God as father, and we've got the Lord's Prayer, the address of God. When we think about the fatherhood of God, it's in some way similar to human fatherhood at its best, but different from human fatherhood. Because I think God is, and this is what I think happens with the story of the Prodigal Son, perhaps better described as Helmut Tiliki did, the story of the waiting father.
When you see that parable in light of the ones that preceded it in Luke 15, the lost sheep, the lost coin. Anyone losing a sheep and recovering it, losing a coin of great value and recovering it would rejoice. But here you've got this third point, a father whose son has gone away, disgracing the family perhaps, and wasting his portion of the family's inheritance and comes back.
You look at the father's response to that and you say, now wait a minute, that's not the way fathers typically respond.
It's more like a mother's response.
Well, I'm not sure mothers either would welcome him back, but you may be onto something. I mean, I can imagine the people hearing these stories instead of saying, well, of course, just like the shepherd, no, there's no rejoicing. This guy has disgraced your family's name.
He's abused the trust you placed in him. Get rid of him. In fact, the son himself thought it would be an example of grace and tolerance if he could just be a servant.
The father welcomes him and restores him. And you got to say, no, no, that's not like fathers ordinarily behave. It just lives by its irony in a way.
And you might say, well, wait a minute, them, if that's the kind of father God is, it's in a sense, it's the contrast between the fatherhood of God and human fatherhood that this parable so vividly illustrates to say, God is a father unlike anyone you've ever known, or been.
Wow. And I hate to refer back to this discussion with Dr. Lamerson, but he was saying that the New testament writers, specifically Hebrews, that it was heavily influenced by Greek philosophy because of shadows and types. And I responded back that shadows and types, that all predated Greek philosophy by a thousand years in the scriptures where God went to great lengths to provide types and shadows of what would come in the future.
And the Greeks, if anything, they're just borrowing the things that the creator who said, let there be light, they're borrowing these concepts from God. He's actually the originator. So even if we think of God as our father, if we think of them as Lord, the Lord's on earth and the father's on earth, they're actually the metaphors.
It's God who is the substance of these things, it seems.
That's a nice way to, I think, sort of flip the ultimate meaning of these words. It's God who perfectly exemplifies fatherhood, and not what we find here. God is the true king who cares and is dedicated to the welfare of God's subjects, and not the sort of tyrant and unquestioning, unquestionable source of power that we find in earthly monarchs.
Right. Writing about the early formulations of open theism in your book, The Future of Open Theism, you say this, God is unchanging, immutable in his essence, but not in his experience, knowledge and action. Could you expound on that?
There's something immutable about God, but not everything about him. So that God is unchanging, immutable in his essence, but not in his experience, knowledge and action.
That's right. I think what open theism gives us is a picture of God that affirms in some important ways, the classical concern for an ultimate source of reality that is unchanging, reliable, shall we say, that makes sense out of the temporal world. In other words, the world we experience is dynamic and changing.
And the more we come to understand it, the more we realize how radically temporal than reality is, down to the behavior of electrons and so on. And so what leads some people to believe in God is the fact there must be something holding this whole thing up, something that sustains it, something that's constant. And that ultimately from, certainly from a believer's standpoint, would be divine reality, an absolute, unchanging source of existence that sort of sustains this whole process.
However, the Bible gives us a view that, and others take the position too, but particularly in the Bible, that God is deeply involved and affected by and responsive to what goes on in the world. You cannot read the Bible without coming up with that view. And I think we just referred to the story of the waiting father or the prodigal son, deeply, you know, intensely responsive to his son's return, deeply committed to the welfare of his children and so on.
And the fact that he has a conversation with the older brother after the son has returned and the older brother is upset, I think we see the sensitivity of the father to others. So I think we do have a view of God as one who is absolutely changeless in certain respects, ultimately powerful, but brings into existence a world in which he is dynamically involved in the experience of the creatures that he loves and seeking by many different manifestations of his providence and resourcefulness to guide them to the fulfillment of his purposes. And this is a God who never gives up, but a God who along the way is deeply disappointed with some of the things that happen.
Yeah, our sin grieves him.
yes, that's right. And I think one of the interesting incidents in the book of Samuel is where the people are unhappy with the way things are about to go. Samuel's sons are not worthy successors to him.
And they say, give us a king. We need some, you know, we need some, what would you call it? Political stability in our system.
And Samuel says, oh no, you don't want to be like that. Look at what kings do. And God instructs Samuel to say, you know, let's go ahead and give the people what they want.
Let them establish a monarch. I agree, it's not going to go well. They won't be happy with the things that a monarch does.
But if that's the direction they insist on going, I'm willing to go ahead. And so you almost have God expressing a willingness to do things that he'd rather not do because he's trying to meet the people halfway.
Dr. Rice, we teach the same here on Bob Enyart Live, Denver Bible Church, with maybe one clarification, that it seems that it was the timing that God intended to introduce a monarch one generation later at the time of David, which when his throne was moved to Jerusalem, it was exactly 1,000 years before Christ's first coming. And you go back in the time of moses, and God predicted that there would be a king. And here are the rules that I want your king to follow.
It's right in the Book of Deuteronomy. But then the people were demanding a king out of due time, not when God wanted to introduce a king. And so then God does agree, although it wasn't his original plan.
A couple of moments ago, Dr. Rice, you mentioned electrons. I just want to make sure I caught what you said. Could you repeat that?
It was just in passing.
Well, what I intended was the more science tells us about the nature of reality, the more we see that time or temporal succession is involved and characterized even in the ultimate or the most infinitesimal parts of reality, atoms, electrons. There's temporal succession there. Electrons move at indescribable speeds and so on.
So you have temporal experience at what we would say the heart of physical reality. So some people have come to the conclusion, there must be something holding this whole process up. And that goes clear back to the cosmological argument as developed by Thomas Aquinas in a world of ongoing change, there must be something that supports this and keeps it going.
So that caught my attention because on Fridays, we air a science show for many years, Real Science Radio, and we've just concluded our series on quantum mechanics of all things.
Well, then you're more up to date on this than I am.
Well, as a Bible thumping pastor. But interestingly, of all the popular interpretations of quantum mechanics, four of them are deterministic, like the many worlds, multiverse. Eight are consistent with indeterminism, and then five others could go either way.
So it's interesting that for some centuries, theologians looked at Newtonian physics, and it all looked very deterministic, and they thought, hey, this supports our reformed theology. But now, in the last century of the era of quantum mechanics, and today even quantum computers, there is a lot of evidence from the physical world that indeterminism is in fact at the heart of God's physical creation.
Right. That's very interesting, and I would defer to your judgment on that. The contrast that I've sometimes made is that of the world being God's adventure and not just God's invention.
Now, if we say, did God invent the world? yes. But is it a machine or is it more like a dynamic relationship?
And I think God created a world that would, in a sense, enable God to have an adventure in relating to the contents of the world and not just lay it out. Now, I like things that do exactly what they're supposed to do. Computers, automobiles, things like that.
But at the same time, if everything were exactly determined, I think we'd have a less rewarding experience and a less rewarding world in which to live. And the idea that God is open is a way of affirming the fact that the world is open. And God is committed to it, pursuing God's objectives, but through a process of interaction.
And I think that takes a remarkable creativity on God's part.
In fact, perhaps the very favorite character in the science fiction Star Trek TV series and movies is Data and Data is not a person, he's a creation. And people have this natural love and wonder toward his character because here is a creation that he is conscious, self-aware, and he's autonomous. He could do things on his own.
And it seems that God, the omnipotent God being able to call things into existence and for God to bring into existence creatures that like him are self-aware, but also like him are autonomous, and they could do things of their own will, actually be truly creative, and actually think thoughts on their own. That would have to be the greatest achievement of anything that God could create. And indeed, that is what the Bible shows that God did create.
Thank you. I think that's a very nice way of putting what it means to be in the image of God. God could have created a world that in every respect did exactly what it was pre-designed to do.
There are certain satisfactions that such a relationship brings, but there are others that involve openness, delight, surprise, and even an element of risk and suspense. And that's the picture of God that the open view of God affirms. So there are things about God that never change, and there are things about God that change more than anything else that we can imagine.
It's a view of God that I think is rich and attractive, faithful to the Bible, philosophically defensible, and personally meaningful.
If we have the time, I have three last questions. One about omniscience, and the other two on the very foundations of open theism as a theology or an argument. You're writing about William Hasker and omniscience, and let me quote, God knows everything that is logically possible to know.
So this is common in open theism circles, that God knows everything that is logically possible to know. Like, he knows how many hairs are on our heads, but not how many hairs are on the boogeyman's head, because the boogeyman doesn't exist. But...
Well, yes, I think what we're trying to say there is that if in fact there is a difference between past and future, or present and future, and the future is in fact open, and it might go in different directions, well, God knows the possible is possible, and the actual is actual. So God knows reality as reality is, and that constitutes perfect knowledge. So the future from the standpoint of open theism is not settled and completely definite.
Their openness, their indefinite aspects to it, their possibilities there that may or may not be realized. God knows it as such. God knows the past is completely settled.
So God knows the past is past, the future is future. So his knowledge of reality is perfect. We could say God is omniscient.
The real difference between the open theist view is not the relative, the adequacy of God's knowledge, but the nature of what God knows. So that would be the difference there.
Those who their theology is founded almost completely on the omnis and ems and omniscience that God has all knowledge, they tend to deny him an entire category of knowledge, which is experiential knowledge. Surely God lacks the first hand knowledge to know what it's like to sin. jesus Christ on the cross, he took our sin upon himself, but he himself did not sin.
He paid the price for us. So I love how you distinguish that future knowledge versus present knowledge. God knows everything that is logically possible to know.
If the future does not exist, therefore, even if God knows everything knowable, that doesn't mean he knows the future decisions of free will agents, nor even his own future decisions. But could I challenge that a bit, Dr. Rice, just a bit, that God knows everything that is logically possible to know, talking about just present knowledge. Like that claim, when theologians make that claim, do they really mean it to be all inclusive and exhaustive?
For example, it seems to me to be a concession to God as though he were a computer database that had no will or no say in the matter, or he's a mathematical equation, or a divine bureaucrat who has no choice but to collect all conceivable knowledge. Like, as the Bible presents God as a person, if God is a person, he might decide what knowledge to retain, what to collect, what to discard. It seems more biblical remembering him as a person to say that God knows everything knowable that he wants to know.
And I could give one example, we could multiply it a thousand times. But let me give one example and then see if you have thoughts on this. If God doesn't care to keep track of which atoms on the earth have gone through the intestines of rodents from the creation until today, what would compel God to keep track of what seems to be meaningless data of all the atoms in the world?
You know, which ones were drank by which insects at which moment in time, and which ones were expelled from which insects. I mean, when theologians talk about God knowing everything, it seems to me, and we've been arguing this on the air since 1991, it seems that they actually don't take the time to ponder what would it mean to really know everything. And what they seem to be saying is that God knows everything that he wants to know.
That's what it seems.
Well, personally, I don't have a problem with the idea of God knowing absolutely everything, including the position of every atom in the universe, let's say a hundred years ago or something like that. If we're saying, though, what clearly is the focus of God's attention and primary concern, then I think we as Christians would say it has to do with God's relationship to human beings, sentient creatures and so on. So it's like you can have all this data in your mind and not necessarily have it detract from the focus of attention on other things.
And one of the things that is a challenge when we make a distinction between actuality and possibility is what sort of distinctions do those represent if we attribute to God's knowledge a full knowledge of each one. If a knowledge of a possibility is somehow exactly the same as God's knowledge of it as an actuality, well, then I think we've created some real problems.
Yeah, we've blurred reality if that were the case.
I think open theists, if you look at the way in which they try to deal with this, don't agree among themselves. They want to maintain a distinction and yet somehow attribute to God perfect knowledge. I like the expression perfect anticipation when it comes to God's knowledge of the future.
Now to anticipate that something perfectly would be to know what is definitely going to happen because of factors that are already here and what might happen. And an example that I use if you're going on a vacation and it's quite a distance away, you may say we will have to stop for gasoline or recharging our electric vehicle every so often and so on. You can anticipate that rather definitely.
But if you're going hiking in the mountains, you may take a first aid kit because you realize some things could happen. We hope they don't, but it is a possibility and we want to be prepared for it. So I know these are analogies, but I think there are differences between things that are definitely going to happen.
You can get prepared for those things that might or might not happen. And I think of God's relation to the future in terms of perfect anticipation. God knows what is definitely going to happen.
A lot of what's going to happen is already in the cards, shall we say, because of present factors. But given the nature of the world God created, there is openness. But God is not taken totally unawares of what's going to happen, even though God is disappointed by what might happen.
Sure.
We know that, you know, in genesis 6, it says, given the way that human beings were going, God was sorry he had created them.
Yeah. He repented that he made man, and he destroyed them.
He was sorry with what had happened because it had such an effect on him and such a disappointing influence. So did God have no idea this was going to happen? I don't think so.
I think giving human beings freedom means that God knew this was a possibility. But I think God did everything God could to minimize the possibility that that would take place. A little like, well, we're both parents, or you've got younger children than I do.
But raising children, we know that there are some risks. We can't prevent the possibility of some mistakes being made, but we do everything we can to influence them, to avoid making these mistakes. But if they do, and sooner or later, sometimes they do, we will meet them and try to do what we can to overcome the consequences and get back on the right path.
I won't give you personal examples, but I'm sure we both had those experiences.
Oh, yeah. As to present knowledge, when we look at the Bible, there are only a couple of locations, but they surely are saying significant things, like with jesus in the Gospels, and God talking to Abraham in the Old testament, where God the Son became flesh through the Incarnation, became the man. The man, jesus Christ, is God the Son.
We have some whom we have debated, like Dr. james White, a reformed theologian, who insists that God the Son did not take on a human nature, which we think is just flat out heresy. It's denying the Incarnation, but he's concerned that if he admits that God the Son took on a human nature, then God changes and he has a greater commitment to this Greek immutability than he does to the Incarnation. So he refuses to admit that God the Son became flesh.
In fact, another theologian, the son of a theologian, RC. Sproul Jr. agreed with james White, and it was on the occasion of my debate with Dr. White, downtown at the Brown Palace in Denver, when this happened and it truly was stunning. But aside from those kinds of aberrations, Christianity has held firmly with amazing tenacity that jesus Christ is fully God.
Fully God, he became man, he's fully God and fully man. And that's true, right? Dr. Rice, I'm not exaggerating that, the position of the church.
No, I think that's where the early church came to that conclusion. And of course, there were, what should we say? Those who maintain he only appeared to be human, he was really a divine being.
Sure. Only participated in human activities, not because he ever got hungry, for example, but just to sort of continue the demonstration. And others maintain that he was essentially human and, you know, only was sort of elevated to the idea or to the status of divinity later on, adoptionism.
So there were extremes. And what the early church came to, Council of Nicaea, was fully God, fully human, fully man, and yet one personality. So they had to deal with this.
So I would say one center of consciousness. Now, this does require us to look carefully at what goes on in jesus' experience. My own view is that jesus' sort of conscious experience was that of a human being.
And that is he had moral struggles, shall we say. We think of the temptations and so on. I think he had consciousness of his divine power that he had access to.
If we think of the very first temptation of the devil in the wilderness, if you're the son of God, turn these stones into bread. Well, jesus had just heard the words, You are the son of God, my beloved son. Well, the devil is saying, You've got power then, just use it to satisfy your hunger now as a human being.
And jesus said, No, I'm going to live by the word of God, and not by some access to supernatural power I might have. That would have violated the conditions, shall we say, of his earthly life and earthly ministry. And so we can see that jesus had this, shall we say, awareness of the power he had access to, but his experience as a human being was that of trusting God, following God, taking God's love and care for him.
As I would say, we could even say a matter of faith. He trusted God.
As the pastor of Denver Bible Church, I would really like to clarify something. When you said jesus had moral struggles, the Bible goes out of its way to tell us that right before that temptation, jesus had fasted for 40 days in the wilderness. And so when Lucifer tempted him with food, that was a real temptation.
That was actually his body longing for nourishment. And here you could have it in a way that causes you to submit to me. So God the Son became flesh, and as a man, his body would have longings that are real.
And as Hebrews says, he therefore is better able to help us when we are tempted because he was tempted. But I would like to clarify that I don't think there's any sense in which we could see that jesus was actually tempted. Not that sinful ideas were not presented to him.
I'm sure they were every day of his life. But the Lord was never wrestling with whether or not to be sexually immoral, whether or not to betray the innocent, whether or not his struggles had to do with the physical aspect of the body that he took on. But I don't think there's any indication, and I would argue strongly, that the Lord never wrestled, for example, with sexual immorality, or with stealing, or betraying his father.
Well, we have to... I think we have to look carefully at what the issues were that jesus was dealing with. My own sense would be, and I might give a somewhat different reading of that first temptation.
I have heard, I've never been, I've never fasted for 40 days, but people have said that if you get in deep into a fast, you don't, you're not hungry anymore. You know, it's not, you know, missing lunch today makes me more hungry for supper. But you got to wonder that if the issue here was doubting what he had heard God say, in other words, this is my beloved son, he's in the wilderness now, it looks like he may be on the verge of perishing.
What does it mean to be God's son? If I can't somehow have demonstrative proof that I have divine power, wouldn't that settle the issue if I were really God's son? And so the issue there is, will I use the power that I may have, or rely on the word of God to give me the assurance I need?
So that's another way of looking at that first temptation, not appetite, but identity.
Well, certainly that's the deeper issue, but I think it's not for no reason that the Bible sets this up in the context of the Lord fasting. And I'm sure it's true. I've read it too.
I've not done it, that you could get to the point where you're not hungry. But once you start thinking about eating, then it's amazing how quickly people could realize, hey, I'm really hungry. It seems that the temptation had to do with the incarnation itself, that God, the Son, was making himself vulnerable by becoming flesh.
And so that was the first of the three avenues of attack that Lucifer brought on jesus. But that's, I think, a relatively minor issue. When I brought that up, it was to get to the Lord saying that speaking of his second coming of that day and hour, no one knows, not even the angels in heaven nor the Son.
So he has a hierarchy. No man, no angel, not even the Son, but only the Father. And that's present knowledge.
The day that the Father plans to have his Son return. And so lacking that knowledge does not in any way diminish the Lord's divinity. He was fully God.
God was fully revealed in the person of jesus Christ. So when and there's other examples too, in the Bible of that. So when we theologians say that God knows everything that is logically possible to know, which is almost when you look, when you even look at the way God created the physical world.
I mean, inside of an atom, right, there's what, two septillion water molecules in a single drop of rain. And inside of every atom, inside the proton, there are three quarks, which are moving at like approaching the speed of light and quadrillions of interactions per second. And can God keep track of all that?
Absolutely, He can. But it seems that our theologians are imposing on God something that he's never claimed for himself. And they seem to be doing it to satisfy some kind of a mathematical equation of their theology about God, and not based on God as a person.
It seems.
I think you're on to something there. One of the, what should I say? One of the apparent inconsistencies of more traditional ways is the fact that people are willing to clarify the meaning of omnipotence, perfect power, when it comes to God, and say, well, that doesn't mean that God can do the logically impossible.
Right.
Can God add two and two and get five? Can God create married bachelors? And the response is, well, of course not.
But that doesn't, that's not a limitation of God's power. It's simply clarifying that what you're, what you verbally put together is not logically doable. And so, you know, that that's not something that makes any sense to do.
And so the parallel would be, when it comes to perfect knowledge, God knows everything logically knowable. does that include all future decisions and so on? Not if they don't exist at this time, not if they're possible objects of knowledge.
And so we're simply clarifying the nature of knowledge and along the lines of the nature of divine power. There's a parallel there.
yes, Dr. Rice, the author of The Future of Open Theism, I think that's a brilliant insight. And there's one that's very close to it. And that's how theologians treat God's knowledge inconsistently with how they treat his power in this way.
God being omniscient isn't claimed to mean that therefore God does everything. God doesn't have to do everything. God being omnipotent isn't claimed to mean that therefore God does everything.
Rather, he has the power to do anything doable that he wants to do. And likewise, if they were to be consistent, God's knowledge shouldn't mean that he knows everything, but rather he has the ability to know anything knowable that he wants to know. It seems like the two are very similar, but they're treated inconsistently.
I think you're right, and that's a problem. I guess the question we would ask is, can God create a world with creatures who have the ability to make decisions on their own and do things that would bring joy and delight to God because he looks forward to them and hopes they will do these things, or disappoint God? Is that the kind of world that's possible for God to create?
And if the answer is, well, no, God cannot create a world that is capable of surprising him. Well, then it sounds like there's something God can't do, or God decided not to create that kind of world. Well, then we've got the contrast between the world in which we live, which seems to be a kind of world where people do things on the basis of free choice and so on.
And that's not the kind of world that it looks like, according to classical theism, that God created. Well, wait a minute here. Can God create that kind of world if God wanted it?
And if God wants a world that has openness to it, a future where people in God's image make their own decisions, and those decisions enter God's knowledge as they're made, well, why couldn't God? Isn't that the kind of world that God created? So it looks like just looking at the kind of world in which we live, a drawing on personal experience, the fact that we make decisions, the fact that some things happen that are a source of delight, other things happen that are a source of disappointment and concern, that seems to be the kind of world that we live in.
And it seems to be the kind of world that the Bible describes God is creating. So it makes sense, I think, to say, yes, this is a logical possibility. In fact, it looks like the actual world that God made.
Dr. Rice, I have kept you way beyond our initial request for your time. You've been so generous. these two questions I have, I'm not going to ask them because we've gone too long, but if we end up doing another program, in addition to continuing to excerpt your book, I have two questions for you about the foundations of the argument or the position of open theism.
So perhaps we'll do another show if that works into your plans. But thank you so very much for taking this time with me and our audience. It truly is an honor.
Well, nice to be with you. Thank you for your interesting questions. Very provocative and for your interest in open theism.
I appreciate it a lot.
Well, you're very welcome. That is Dr. Richard Rice, one of the leading authors of the open theism movement. And of course, we will link to his latest book, The Future of Open Theism.
And if you go to opentheism.org and click on the timeline, you will see that it defaults to an entry for Dr. Rice. So it's a lot of fun. He's the man who put two words together and coined open theism.
This is Bob Enyart. May God bless you.
Hey, this is Dominic Enyart in studio. Thank you for joining us for that broadcast. A lot of fun, really insightful show.
Dr. Richard Rice and Bob Enyart, a power duo here on KGOV. Hope you really enjoyed that. If you want to support KGOV, the KGOV ministries, head to the store, kgov.com, click on the store, get any of Bob's vast library of products.
You do not want to miss any of those. His Bible study resources, his topical resources, God and the death penalty, verse by verse through the entire Bible. Such good stuff.
It helps you and it helps us. So it's a win-win. Again, kgov.com, click on the store.